Cargando…

Diagnostic interval for non-screening patients undergoing mammography during the COVID-19 pandemic

OBJECTIVE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a temporary cessation of mammography screening. However, in some facilities, diagnostic breast imaging services continued for patients with a high clinical suspicion of breast cancer. The objective of this study was to evaluate changes in the diagno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crivellaro, Priscila, Tafur, Monica, George, Ralph, Muradali, Derek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8211559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34143286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08117-z
_version_ 1783709489248075776
author Crivellaro, Priscila
Tafur, Monica
George, Ralph
Muradali, Derek
author_facet Crivellaro, Priscila
Tafur, Monica
George, Ralph
Muradali, Derek
author_sort Crivellaro, Priscila
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a temporary cessation of mammography screening. However, in some facilities, diagnostic breast imaging services continued for patients with a high clinical suspicion of breast cancer. The objective of this study was to evaluate changes in the diagnostic interval (DI) of non-screening patients presenting for diagnostic mammography during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed on patients presenting for non-screening diagnostic mammography from April 1 to June 30, 2020 (pandemic group) and April 1 to June 30, 2019 (pre-pandemic group). Age, reason for referral, number and type of imaging studies/biopsies necessary for a final diagnosis were recorded. Diagnostic interval (DI) was defined as the number of days from the date of the diagnostic mammogram to the date of the final diagnosis. RESULTS: Compared to the pre-pandemic group (n = 64), the pandemic group (n = 77) showed a reduction in DI of the entire cohort (pandemic: 1 day; pre-pandemic: 15 days, p < 0.0001) for patients not requiring tissue sampling (pandemic: 1 day; pre-pandemic: 11 days, .p < 0.0001) and those requiring tissue sampling with benign pathology (pandemic 9 days; pre-pandemic, 33 days, p = 0.0002). A higher percentage of patients in the pandemic group had their assessment completed during the initial visit (pandemic: 50.6%; pre-pandemic: 23.4%, p = 0.0009). CONCLUSION: During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, the DI for patients with non-screening-related diagnostic mammography was significantly shorter, with a higher percentage of patients completing their assessments on the initial visit, compared to one year prior. KEY POINTS: • Despite reductions in manpower and clinical services, during pandemic times, it is possible to maintain a diagnostic breast imaging service for women at high clinical suspicion for breast cancer. • During pandemic times, breast imaging departments should consider restructuring to a Rapid Diagnostic Unit model with a navigation team that follows patients through the assessment process to a final diagnosis. • Departmental restructuring and patient navigation during pandemic times could either maintain or shorten the diagnostic interval for patients presenting for diagnostic mammography.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8211559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82115592021-06-21 Diagnostic interval for non-screening patients undergoing mammography during the COVID-19 pandemic Crivellaro, Priscila Tafur, Monica George, Ralph Muradali, Derek Eur Radiol Breast OBJECTIVE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a temporary cessation of mammography screening. However, in some facilities, diagnostic breast imaging services continued for patients with a high clinical suspicion of breast cancer. The objective of this study was to evaluate changes in the diagnostic interval (DI) of non-screening patients presenting for diagnostic mammography during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed on patients presenting for non-screening diagnostic mammography from April 1 to June 30, 2020 (pandemic group) and April 1 to June 30, 2019 (pre-pandemic group). Age, reason for referral, number and type of imaging studies/biopsies necessary for a final diagnosis were recorded. Diagnostic interval (DI) was defined as the number of days from the date of the diagnostic mammogram to the date of the final diagnosis. RESULTS: Compared to the pre-pandemic group (n = 64), the pandemic group (n = 77) showed a reduction in DI of the entire cohort (pandemic: 1 day; pre-pandemic: 15 days, p < 0.0001) for patients not requiring tissue sampling (pandemic: 1 day; pre-pandemic: 11 days, .p < 0.0001) and those requiring tissue sampling with benign pathology (pandemic 9 days; pre-pandemic, 33 days, p = 0.0002). A higher percentage of patients in the pandemic group had their assessment completed during the initial visit (pandemic: 50.6%; pre-pandemic: 23.4%, p = 0.0009). CONCLUSION: During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, the DI for patients with non-screening-related diagnostic mammography was significantly shorter, with a higher percentage of patients completing their assessments on the initial visit, compared to one year prior. KEY POINTS: • Despite reductions in manpower and clinical services, during pandemic times, it is possible to maintain a diagnostic breast imaging service for women at high clinical suspicion for breast cancer. • During pandemic times, breast imaging departments should consider restructuring to a Rapid Diagnostic Unit model with a navigation team that follows patients through the assessment process to a final diagnosis. • Departmental restructuring and patient navigation during pandemic times could either maintain or shorten the diagnostic interval for patients presenting for diagnostic mammography. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-18 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8211559/ /pubmed/34143286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08117-z Text en © European Society of Radiology 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Breast
Crivellaro, Priscila
Tafur, Monica
George, Ralph
Muradali, Derek
Diagnostic interval for non-screening patients undergoing mammography during the COVID-19 pandemic
title Diagnostic interval for non-screening patients undergoing mammography during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full Diagnostic interval for non-screening patients undergoing mammography during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_fullStr Diagnostic interval for non-screening patients undergoing mammography during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic interval for non-screening patients undergoing mammography during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_short Diagnostic interval for non-screening patients undergoing mammography during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_sort diagnostic interval for non-screening patients undergoing mammography during the covid-19 pandemic
topic Breast
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8211559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34143286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08117-z
work_keys_str_mv AT crivellaropriscila diagnosticintervalfornonscreeningpatientsundergoingmammographyduringthecovid19pandemic
AT tafurmonica diagnosticintervalfornonscreeningpatientsundergoingmammographyduringthecovid19pandemic
AT georgeralph diagnosticintervalfornonscreeningpatientsundergoingmammographyduringthecovid19pandemic
AT muradaliderek diagnosticintervalfornonscreeningpatientsundergoingmammographyduringthecovid19pandemic