Letter to the Editor of the Journal of Artificial Organs: The flaws in the detail of describing methods, comparing patient cohorts and interpreting results

We read with great interest the article written by Murphy et al. (J Artif Organs 22:286–293, 2019). We acknowledge the authors contribution. However, the results presented may be difficult to interpret due to several missing information and therefore may not support the conclusions. Therefore, the r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maier, Sven, Klemm, Rolf, Beyersdorf, Friedhelm, Benk, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Japan 2020
Materias:
Letter to the Editor
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8211573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32671508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10047-020-01195-8
_version_ 1783709492559478784
author Maier, Sven
Klemm, Rolf
Beyersdorf, Friedhelm
Benk, Christoph
author_facet Maier, Sven
Klemm, Rolf
Beyersdorf, Friedhelm
Benk, Christoph
author_sort Maier, Sven
collection PubMed
description We read with great interest the article written by Murphy et al. (J Artif Organs 22:286–293, 2019). We acknowledge the authors contribution. However, the results presented may be difficult to interpret due to several missing information and therefore may not support the conclusions. Therefore, the results of this publication should be viewed very critically.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8211573
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Japan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82115732021-07-01 Letter to the Editor of the Journal of Artificial Organs: The flaws in the detail of describing methods, comparing patient cohorts and interpreting results Maier, Sven Klemm, Rolf Beyersdorf, Friedhelm Benk, Christoph J Artif Organs Letter to the Editor We read with great interest the article written by Murphy et al. (J Artif Organs 22:286–293, 2019). We acknowledge the authors contribution. However, the results presented may be difficult to interpret due to several missing information and therefore may not support the conclusions. Therefore, the results of this publication should be viewed very critically. Springer Japan 2020-07-15 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8211573/ /pubmed/32671508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10047-020-01195-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Letter to the Editor
Maier, Sven
Klemm, Rolf
Beyersdorf, Friedhelm
Benk, Christoph
Letter to the Editor of the Journal of Artificial Organs: The flaws in the detail of describing methods, comparing patient cohorts and interpreting results
title Letter to the Editor of the Journal of Artificial Organs: The flaws in the detail of describing methods, comparing patient cohorts and interpreting results
title_full Letter to the Editor of the Journal of Artificial Organs: The flaws in the detail of describing methods, comparing patient cohorts and interpreting results
title_fullStr Letter to the Editor of the Journal of Artificial Organs: The flaws in the detail of describing methods, comparing patient cohorts and interpreting results
title_full_unstemmed Letter to the Editor of the Journal of Artificial Organs: The flaws in the detail of describing methods, comparing patient cohorts and interpreting results
title_short Letter to the Editor of the Journal of Artificial Organs: The flaws in the detail of describing methods, comparing patient cohorts and interpreting results
title_sort letter to the editor of the journal of artificial organs: the flaws in the detail of describing methods, comparing patient cohorts and interpreting results
topic Letter to the Editor
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8211573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32671508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10047-020-01195-8
work_keys_str_mv AT maiersven lettertotheeditorofthejournalofartificialorganstheflawsinthedetailofdescribingmethodscomparingpatientcohortsandinterpretingresults
AT klemmrolf lettertotheeditorofthejournalofartificialorganstheflawsinthedetailofdescribingmethodscomparingpatientcohortsandinterpretingresults
AT beyersdorffriedhelm lettertotheeditorofthejournalofartificialorganstheflawsinthedetailofdescribingmethodscomparingpatientcohortsandinterpretingresults
AT benkchristoph lettertotheeditorofthejournalofartificialorganstheflawsinthedetailofdescribingmethodscomparingpatientcohortsandinterpretingresults

Ejemplares similares