Cargando…

Solitaire Stentectomy Using a Stent-Retriever Technique in a Porcine Model

PURPOSE: Mechanical thrombectomy using the Solitaire device has become a standard treatment of ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusions. Inadvertent detachment is a feared complication, which is associated with poor clinical outcome. The aim of this experimental study was to assess in a porcin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simgen, Andreas, Kettner, Michael, Webelsiep, Frida Juliane, Tomori, Toshiki, Mühl-Benninghaus, Ruben, Yilmaz, Umut, Bhogal, Pervinder, Laschke, Matthias W., Menger, Michael D., Reith, Wolfgang, Dietrich, Philipp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8211602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32424667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-020-00906-1
_version_ 1783709499022901248
author Simgen, Andreas
Kettner, Michael
Webelsiep, Frida Juliane
Tomori, Toshiki
Mühl-Benninghaus, Ruben
Yilmaz, Umut
Bhogal, Pervinder
Laschke, Matthias W.
Menger, Michael D.
Reith, Wolfgang
Dietrich, Philipp
author_facet Simgen, Andreas
Kettner, Michael
Webelsiep, Frida Juliane
Tomori, Toshiki
Mühl-Benninghaus, Ruben
Yilmaz, Umut
Bhogal, Pervinder
Laschke, Matthias W.
Menger, Michael D.
Reith, Wolfgang
Dietrich, Philipp
author_sort Simgen, Andreas
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Mechanical thrombectomy using the Solitaire device has become a standard treatment of ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusions. Inadvertent detachment is a feared complication, which is associated with poor clinical outcome. The aim of this experimental study was to assess in a porcine model the feasibility and effectiveness of rescuing detached Solitaire devices using different stent retrievers. METHODS: Solitaire FR devices (4 × 15/20 mm and 6 × 20/30 mm) were placed in the axillary artery of pigs. By means of 3 different stent retrievers (Trevo ProVue; EmboTrap II revascularization device; 3D revascularization device) a total of 24 rescue maneuvers (8 per retriever) were performed by deploying the retrievers within the deployed Solitaire devices and trapping parts of the Solitaire within the microcatheter. Rescue rates, rescue time and complications were assessed. RESULTS: Overall stentectomy of the Solitaire devices was successful in all cases (100%). Time of rescue was comparable using the applied stent retrievers (Trevo ProVue; EmboTrap II revascularization device; 3D revascularization device). Complications, such as entrapment of the Solitaire-retriever complex at the intermediate catheter, Solitaire migration, vasospasm, perforation, or dissection were not observed. CONCLUSION: Stentectomy of inadvertently detached Solitaire devices using different stent retrievers is a feasible and effective method. Rescue rates and times with the Trevo ProVue, EmboTrap II and 3D revascularization device were comparable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8211602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82116022021-07-01 Solitaire Stentectomy Using a Stent-Retriever Technique in a Porcine Model Simgen, Andreas Kettner, Michael Webelsiep, Frida Juliane Tomori, Toshiki Mühl-Benninghaus, Ruben Yilmaz, Umut Bhogal, Pervinder Laschke, Matthias W. Menger, Michael D. Reith, Wolfgang Dietrich, Philipp Clin Neuroradiol Original Article PURPOSE: Mechanical thrombectomy using the Solitaire device has become a standard treatment of ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusions. Inadvertent detachment is a feared complication, which is associated with poor clinical outcome. The aim of this experimental study was to assess in a porcine model the feasibility and effectiveness of rescuing detached Solitaire devices using different stent retrievers. METHODS: Solitaire FR devices (4 × 15/20 mm and 6 × 20/30 mm) were placed in the axillary artery of pigs. By means of 3 different stent retrievers (Trevo ProVue; EmboTrap II revascularization device; 3D revascularization device) a total of 24 rescue maneuvers (8 per retriever) were performed by deploying the retrievers within the deployed Solitaire devices and trapping parts of the Solitaire within the microcatheter. Rescue rates, rescue time and complications were assessed. RESULTS: Overall stentectomy of the Solitaire devices was successful in all cases (100%). Time of rescue was comparable using the applied stent retrievers (Trevo ProVue; EmboTrap II revascularization device; 3D revascularization device). Complications, such as entrapment of the Solitaire-retriever complex at the intermediate catheter, Solitaire migration, vasospasm, perforation, or dissection were not observed. CONCLUSION: Stentectomy of inadvertently detached Solitaire devices using different stent retrievers is a feasible and effective method. Rescue rates and times with the Trevo ProVue, EmboTrap II and 3D revascularization device were comparable. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-05-18 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8211602/ /pubmed/32424667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-020-00906-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Simgen, Andreas
Kettner, Michael
Webelsiep, Frida Juliane
Tomori, Toshiki
Mühl-Benninghaus, Ruben
Yilmaz, Umut
Bhogal, Pervinder
Laschke, Matthias W.
Menger, Michael D.
Reith, Wolfgang
Dietrich, Philipp
Solitaire Stentectomy Using a Stent-Retriever Technique in a Porcine Model
title Solitaire Stentectomy Using a Stent-Retriever Technique in a Porcine Model
title_full Solitaire Stentectomy Using a Stent-Retriever Technique in a Porcine Model
title_fullStr Solitaire Stentectomy Using a Stent-Retriever Technique in a Porcine Model
title_full_unstemmed Solitaire Stentectomy Using a Stent-Retriever Technique in a Porcine Model
title_short Solitaire Stentectomy Using a Stent-Retriever Technique in a Porcine Model
title_sort solitaire stentectomy using a stent-retriever technique in a porcine model
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8211602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32424667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-020-00906-1
work_keys_str_mv AT simgenandreas solitairestentectomyusingastentretrievertechniqueinaporcinemodel
AT kettnermichael solitairestentectomyusingastentretrievertechniqueinaporcinemodel
AT webelsiepfridajuliane solitairestentectomyusingastentretrievertechniqueinaporcinemodel
AT tomoritoshiki solitairestentectomyusingastentretrievertechniqueinaporcinemodel
AT muhlbenninghausruben solitairestentectomyusingastentretrievertechniqueinaporcinemodel
AT yilmazumut solitairestentectomyusingastentretrievertechniqueinaporcinemodel
AT bhogalpervinder solitairestentectomyusingastentretrievertechniqueinaporcinemodel
AT laschkematthiasw solitairestentectomyusingastentretrievertechniqueinaporcinemodel
AT mengermichaeld solitairestentectomyusingastentretrievertechniqueinaporcinemodel
AT reithwolfgang solitairestentectomyusingastentretrievertechniqueinaporcinemodel
AT dietrichphilipp solitairestentectomyusingastentretrievertechniqueinaporcinemodel