Cargando…
Solitaire Stentectomy Using a Stent-Retriever Technique in a Porcine Model
PURPOSE: Mechanical thrombectomy using the Solitaire device has become a standard treatment of ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusions. Inadvertent detachment is a feared complication, which is associated with poor clinical outcome. The aim of this experimental study was to assess in a porcin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8211602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32424667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-020-00906-1 |
_version_ | 1783709499022901248 |
---|---|
author | Simgen, Andreas Kettner, Michael Webelsiep, Frida Juliane Tomori, Toshiki Mühl-Benninghaus, Ruben Yilmaz, Umut Bhogal, Pervinder Laschke, Matthias W. Menger, Michael D. Reith, Wolfgang Dietrich, Philipp |
author_facet | Simgen, Andreas Kettner, Michael Webelsiep, Frida Juliane Tomori, Toshiki Mühl-Benninghaus, Ruben Yilmaz, Umut Bhogal, Pervinder Laschke, Matthias W. Menger, Michael D. Reith, Wolfgang Dietrich, Philipp |
author_sort | Simgen, Andreas |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Mechanical thrombectomy using the Solitaire device has become a standard treatment of ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusions. Inadvertent detachment is a feared complication, which is associated with poor clinical outcome. The aim of this experimental study was to assess in a porcine model the feasibility and effectiveness of rescuing detached Solitaire devices using different stent retrievers. METHODS: Solitaire FR devices (4 × 15/20 mm and 6 × 20/30 mm) were placed in the axillary artery of pigs. By means of 3 different stent retrievers (Trevo ProVue; EmboTrap II revascularization device; 3D revascularization device) a total of 24 rescue maneuvers (8 per retriever) were performed by deploying the retrievers within the deployed Solitaire devices and trapping parts of the Solitaire within the microcatheter. Rescue rates, rescue time and complications were assessed. RESULTS: Overall stentectomy of the Solitaire devices was successful in all cases (100%). Time of rescue was comparable using the applied stent retrievers (Trevo ProVue; EmboTrap II revascularization device; 3D revascularization device). Complications, such as entrapment of the Solitaire-retriever complex at the intermediate catheter, Solitaire migration, vasospasm, perforation, or dissection were not observed. CONCLUSION: Stentectomy of inadvertently detached Solitaire devices using different stent retrievers is a feasible and effective method. Rescue rates and times with the Trevo ProVue, EmboTrap II and 3D revascularization device were comparable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8211602 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82116022021-07-01 Solitaire Stentectomy Using a Stent-Retriever Technique in a Porcine Model Simgen, Andreas Kettner, Michael Webelsiep, Frida Juliane Tomori, Toshiki Mühl-Benninghaus, Ruben Yilmaz, Umut Bhogal, Pervinder Laschke, Matthias W. Menger, Michael D. Reith, Wolfgang Dietrich, Philipp Clin Neuroradiol Original Article PURPOSE: Mechanical thrombectomy using the Solitaire device has become a standard treatment of ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusions. Inadvertent detachment is a feared complication, which is associated with poor clinical outcome. The aim of this experimental study was to assess in a porcine model the feasibility and effectiveness of rescuing detached Solitaire devices using different stent retrievers. METHODS: Solitaire FR devices (4 × 15/20 mm and 6 × 20/30 mm) were placed in the axillary artery of pigs. By means of 3 different stent retrievers (Trevo ProVue; EmboTrap II revascularization device; 3D revascularization device) a total of 24 rescue maneuvers (8 per retriever) were performed by deploying the retrievers within the deployed Solitaire devices and trapping parts of the Solitaire within the microcatheter. Rescue rates, rescue time and complications were assessed. RESULTS: Overall stentectomy of the Solitaire devices was successful in all cases (100%). Time of rescue was comparable using the applied stent retrievers (Trevo ProVue; EmboTrap II revascularization device; 3D revascularization device). Complications, such as entrapment of the Solitaire-retriever complex at the intermediate catheter, Solitaire migration, vasospasm, perforation, or dissection were not observed. CONCLUSION: Stentectomy of inadvertently detached Solitaire devices using different stent retrievers is a feasible and effective method. Rescue rates and times with the Trevo ProVue, EmboTrap II and 3D revascularization device were comparable. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-05-18 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8211602/ /pubmed/32424667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-020-00906-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Simgen, Andreas Kettner, Michael Webelsiep, Frida Juliane Tomori, Toshiki Mühl-Benninghaus, Ruben Yilmaz, Umut Bhogal, Pervinder Laschke, Matthias W. Menger, Michael D. Reith, Wolfgang Dietrich, Philipp Solitaire Stentectomy Using a Stent-Retriever Technique in a Porcine Model |
title | Solitaire Stentectomy Using a Stent-Retriever Technique in a Porcine Model |
title_full | Solitaire Stentectomy Using a Stent-Retriever Technique in a Porcine Model |
title_fullStr | Solitaire Stentectomy Using a Stent-Retriever Technique in a Porcine Model |
title_full_unstemmed | Solitaire Stentectomy Using a Stent-Retriever Technique in a Porcine Model |
title_short | Solitaire Stentectomy Using a Stent-Retriever Technique in a Porcine Model |
title_sort | solitaire stentectomy using a stent-retriever technique in a porcine model |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8211602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32424667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-020-00906-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT simgenandreas solitairestentectomyusingastentretrievertechniqueinaporcinemodel AT kettnermichael solitairestentectomyusingastentretrievertechniqueinaporcinemodel AT webelsiepfridajuliane solitairestentectomyusingastentretrievertechniqueinaporcinemodel AT tomoritoshiki solitairestentectomyusingastentretrievertechniqueinaporcinemodel AT muhlbenninghausruben solitairestentectomyusingastentretrievertechniqueinaporcinemodel AT yilmazumut solitairestentectomyusingastentretrievertechniqueinaporcinemodel AT bhogalpervinder solitairestentectomyusingastentretrievertechniqueinaporcinemodel AT laschkematthiasw solitairestentectomyusingastentretrievertechniqueinaporcinemodel AT mengermichaeld solitairestentectomyusingastentretrievertechniqueinaporcinemodel AT reithwolfgang solitairestentectomyusingastentretrievertechniqueinaporcinemodel AT dietrichphilipp solitairestentectomyusingastentretrievertechniqueinaporcinemodel |