Cargando…
Automated Perfusion Calculations vs. Visual Scoring of Collaterals and CBV-ASPECTS: Has the Machine Surpassed the Eye?
PURPOSE: Use of automated perfusion software has gained importance for imaging of stroke patients for mechanical thrombectomy (MT). We aim to compare four perfusion software packages: 1) with respect to their association with 3‑month functional outcome after successful reperfusion with MT in compari...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8211603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33216157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-020-00974-3 |
_version_ | 1783709499352154112 |
---|---|
author | Psychogios, Marios-Nikos Sporns, Peter B. Ospel, Johanna Katsanos, Aristeidis H. Kabiri, Reza Flottmann, Fabian A. Menon, Bijoy K. Horn, Mackenzie Liebeskind, David S. Honda, Tristan Ribo, Marc Ruiz, Manuel Requena Kabbasch, Christoph Lichtenstein, Thorsten Maurer, Christoph J. Berlis, Ansgar Hellstern, Victoria Henkes, Hans Möhlenbruch, Markus A. Seker, Fatih Ernst, Marielle S. Liman, Jan Tsivgoulis, Georgios Brehm, Alex |
author_facet | Psychogios, Marios-Nikos Sporns, Peter B. Ospel, Johanna Katsanos, Aristeidis H. Kabiri, Reza Flottmann, Fabian A. Menon, Bijoy K. Horn, Mackenzie Liebeskind, David S. Honda, Tristan Ribo, Marc Ruiz, Manuel Requena Kabbasch, Christoph Lichtenstein, Thorsten Maurer, Christoph J. Berlis, Ansgar Hellstern, Victoria Henkes, Hans Möhlenbruch, Markus A. Seker, Fatih Ernst, Marielle S. Liman, Jan Tsivgoulis, Georgios Brehm, Alex |
author_sort | Psychogios, Marios-Nikos |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Use of automated perfusion software has gained importance for imaging of stroke patients for mechanical thrombectomy (MT). We aim to compare four perfusion software packages: 1) with respect to their association with 3‑month functional outcome after successful reperfusion with MT in comparison to visual Cerebral Blood Volume - Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (CBV-ASPECTS) and collateral scoring and 2) with respect to their agreement in estimation of core and penumbra volume. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter cohort study (2015–2019) analyzed data from 8 centers. We included patients who were functionally independent before and underwent successful MT of the middle cerebral artery. Primary outcome measurements were the relationship of core and penumbra volume calculated by each software, qualitative assessment of collaterals and CBV-APECTS with 3‑month functional outcome and disability (modified Rankin scale >2). Quantitative differences between perfusion software measurements were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 215 patients (57% women, median age 77 years) from 8 centers fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Multivariable analyses showed a significant association of RAPID core (common odds ratio, cOR 1.02; p = 0.015), CBV-ASPECTS (cOR 0.78; p = 0.007) and collaterals (cOR 0.78; p = 0.001) with 3‑month functional outcome (shift analysis), while RAPID core (OR 1.02; p = 0.018), CBV-ASPECTS (OR 0.77; p = 0.024), collaterals (OR 0.78; p = 0.007) and OLEA core (OR 1.02; p = 0.029) were significantly associated with 3‑month functional disability. Mean differences on core estimates between VEOcore and RAPID were 13.4 ml, between syngo.via and RAPID 30.0 ml and between OLEA and RAPID −3.2 ml. CONCLUSION: Collateral scoring, CBV-ASPECTS and RAPID were independently associated with functional outcome at 90 days. Core and Penumbra estimates using automated software packages varied significantly and should therefore be used with caution. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00062-020-00974-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8211603 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82116032021-07-01 Automated Perfusion Calculations vs. Visual Scoring of Collaterals and CBV-ASPECTS: Has the Machine Surpassed the Eye? Psychogios, Marios-Nikos Sporns, Peter B. Ospel, Johanna Katsanos, Aristeidis H. Kabiri, Reza Flottmann, Fabian A. Menon, Bijoy K. Horn, Mackenzie Liebeskind, David S. Honda, Tristan Ribo, Marc Ruiz, Manuel Requena Kabbasch, Christoph Lichtenstein, Thorsten Maurer, Christoph J. Berlis, Ansgar Hellstern, Victoria Henkes, Hans Möhlenbruch, Markus A. Seker, Fatih Ernst, Marielle S. Liman, Jan Tsivgoulis, Georgios Brehm, Alex Clin Neuroradiol Original Article PURPOSE: Use of automated perfusion software has gained importance for imaging of stroke patients for mechanical thrombectomy (MT). We aim to compare four perfusion software packages: 1) with respect to their association with 3‑month functional outcome after successful reperfusion with MT in comparison to visual Cerebral Blood Volume - Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (CBV-ASPECTS) and collateral scoring and 2) with respect to their agreement in estimation of core and penumbra volume. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter cohort study (2015–2019) analyzed data from 8 centers. We included patients who were functionally independent before and underwent successful MT of the middle cerebral artery. Primary outcome measurements were the relationship of core and penumbra volume calculated by each software, qualitative assessment of collaterals and CBV-APECTS with 3‑month functional outcome and disability (modified Rankin scale >2). Quantitative differences between perfusion software measurements were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 215 patients (57% women, median age 77 years) from 8 centers fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Multivariable analyses showed a significant association of RAPID core (common odds ratio, cOR 1.02; p = 0.015), CBV-ASPECTS (cOR 0.78; p = 0.007) and collaterals (cOR 0.78; p = 0.001) with 3‑month functional outcome (shift analysis), while RAPID core (OR 1.02; p = 0.018), CBV-ASPECTS (OR 0.77; p = 0.024), collaterals (OR 0.78; p = 0.007) and OLEA core (OR 1.02; p = 0.029) were significantly associated with 3‑month functional disability. Mean differences on core estimates between VEOcore and RAPID were 13.4 ml, between syngo.via and RAPID 30.0 ml and between OLEA and RAPID −3.2 ml. CONCLUSION: Collateral scoring, CBV-ASPECTS and RAPID were independently associated with functional outcome at 90 days. Core and Penumbra estimates using automated software packages varied significantly and should therefore be used with caution. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00062-020-00974-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-11-20 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8211603/ /pubmed/33216157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-020-00974-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Psychogios, Marios-Nikos Sporns, Peter B. Ospel, Johanna Katsanos, Aristeidis H. Kabiri, Reza Flottmann, Fabian A. Menon, Bijoy K. Horn, Mackenzie Liebeskind, David S. Honda, Tristan Ribo, Marc Ruiz, Manuel Requena Kabbasch, Christoph Lichtenstein, Thorsten Maurer, Christoph J. Berlis, Ansgar Hellstern, Victoria Henkes, Hans Möhlenbruch, Markus A. Seker, Fatih Ernst, Marielle S. Liman, Jan Tsivgoulis, Georgios Brehm, Alex Automated Perfusion Calculations vs. Visual Scoring of Collaterals and CBV-ASPECTS: Has the Machine Surpassed the Eye? |
title | Automated Perfusion Calculations vs. Visual Scoring of Collaterals and CBV-ASPECTS: Has the Machine Surpassed the Eye? |
title_full | Automated Perfusion Calculations vs. Visual Scoring of Collaterals and CBV-ASPECTS: Has the Machine Surpassed the Eye? |
title_fullStr | Automated Perfusion Calculations vs. Visual Scoring of Collaterals and CBV-ASPECTS: Has the Machine Surpassed the Eye? |
title_full_unstemmed | Automated Perfusion Calculations vs. Visual Scoring of Collaterals and CBV-ASPECTS: Has the Machine Surpassed the Eye? |
title_short | Automated Perfusion Calculations vs. Visual Scoring of Collaterals and CBV-ASPECTS: Has the Machine Surpassed the Eye? |
title_sort | automated perfusion calculations vs. visual scoring of collaterals and cbv-aspects: has the machine surpassed the eye? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8211603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33216157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-020-00974-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT psychogiosmariosnikos automatedperfusioncalculationsvsvisualscoringofcollateralsandcbvaspectshasthemachinesurpassedtheeye AT spornspeterb automatedperfusioncalculationsvsvisualscoringofcollateralsandcbvaspectshasthemachinesurpassedtheeye AT ospeljohanna automatedperfusioncalculationsvsvisualscoringofcollateralsandcbvaspectshasthemachinesurpassedtheeye AT katsanosaristeidish automatedperfusioncalculationsvsvisualscoringofcollateralsandcbvaspectshasthemachinesurpassedtheeye AT kabirireza automatedperfusioncalculationsvsvisualscoringofcollateralsandcbvaspectshasthemachinesurpassedtheeye AT flottmannfabiana automatedperfusioncalculationsvsvisualscoringofcollateralsandcbvaspectshasthemachinesurpassedtheeye AT menonbijoyk automatedperfusioncalculationsvsvisualscoringofcollateralsandcbvaspectshasthemachinesurpassedtheeye AT hornmackenzie automatedperfusioncalculationsvsvisualscoringofcollateralsandcbvaspectshasthemachinesurpassedtheeye AT liebeskinddavids automatedperfusioncalculationsvsvisualscoringofcollateralsandcbvaspectshasthemachinesurpassedtheeye AT hondatristan automatedperfusioncalculationsvsvisualscoringofcollateralsandcbvaspectshasthemachinesurpassedtheeye AT ribomarc automatedperfusioncalculationsvsvisualscoringofcollateralsandcbvaspectshasthemachinesurpassedtheeye AT ruizmanuelrequena automatedperfusioncalculationsvsvisualscoringofcollateralsandcbvaspectshasthemachinesurpassedtheeye AT kabbaschchristoph automatedperfusioncalculationsvsvisualscoringofcollateralsandcbvaspectshasthemachinesurpassedtheeye AT lichtensteinthorsten automatedperfusioncalculationsvsvisualscoringofcollateralsandcbvaspectshasthemachinesurpassedtheeye AT maurerchristophj automatedperfusioncalculationsvsvisualscoringofcollateralsandcbvaspectshasthemachinesurpassedtheeye AT berlisansgar automatedperfusioncalculationsvsvisualscoringofcollateralsandcbvaspectshasthemachinesurpassedtheeye AT hellsternvictoria automatedperfusioncalculationsvsvisualscoringofcollateralsandcbvaspectshasthemachinesurpassedtheeye AT henkeshans automatedperfusioncalculationsvsvisualscoringofcollateralsandcbvaspectshasthemachinesurpassedtheeye AT mohlenbruchmarkusa automatedperfusioncalculationsvsvisualscoringofcollateralsandcbvaspectshasthemachinesurpassedtheeye AT sekerfatih automatedperfusioncalculationsvsvisualscoringofcollateralsandcbvaspectshasthemachinesurpassedtheeye AT ernstmarielles automatedperfusioncalculationsvsvisualscoringofcollateralsandcbvaspectshasthemachinesurpassedtheeye AT limanjan automatedperfusioncalculationsvsvisualscoringofcollateralsandcbvaspectshasthemachinesurpassedtheeye AT tsivgoulisgeorgios automatedperfusioncalculationsvsvisualscoringofcollateralsandcbvaspectshasthemachinesurpassedtheeye AT brehmalex automatedperfusioncalculationsvsvisualscoringofcollateralsandcbvaspectshasthemachinesurpassedtheeye |