Cargando…
Comparison Between Cultivation and Sequencing Based Approaches for Microbiota Analysis in Swabs and Biopsies of Chronic Wounds
Chronic wounds are a prominent health concern affecting 0.2% of individuals in the Western population. Microbial colonization and the consequent infection contribute significantly to the healing process. We have compared two methods, cultivation and 16S amplicon sequencing (16S-AS), for the characte...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8211761/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34150786 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.607255 |
_version_ | 1783709535928582144 |
---|---|
author | Mahnic, Aleksander Breznik, Vesna Bombek Ihan, Maja Rupnik, Maja |
author_facet | Mahnic, Aleksander Breznik, Vesna Bombek Ihan, Maja Rupnik, Maja |
author_sort | Mahnic, Aleksander |
collection | PubMed |
description | Chronic wounds are a prominent health concern affecting 0.2% of individuals in the Western population. Microbial colonization and the consequent infection contribute significantly to the healing process. We have compared two methods, cultivation and 16S amplicon sequencing (16S-AS), for the characterization of bacterial populations in both swabs and biopsy tissues obtained from 45 chronic wounds. Using cultivation approach, we detected a total of 39 bacterial species, on average 2.89 per sample (SD = 1.93), compared to 5.9 (SD = 7.1) operational taxonomic units per sample obtained with 16S-AS. The concordance in detected bacteria between swab and biopsy specimens obtained from the same CWs was greater when using cultivation (58.4%) as compared to 16S-AS (25%). In the entire group of 45 biopsy samples concordance in detected bacterial genera between 16S-AS and cultivation-based approach was 36.4% and in swab samples 28.7%. Sequencing proved advantageous in comparison to the cultivation mainly in case of highly diverse microbial communities, where we could additionally detect numerous obligate and facultative anaerobic bacteria from genera Anaerococcus, Finegoldia, Porphyromonas, Morganella, and Providencia. Comparing swabs and biopsy tissues we concluded, that neither sampling method shows significant advantage over the other regardless of the method used (16S-AS or cultivation). In this study, chronic wound microbiota could be distributed into three groups based on the bacterial community diversity. The chronic wound surface area was positively correlated with bacterial diversity in swab specimens but not in biopsy tissues. Larger chronic wound surface area was also associated with the presence of Pseudomonas in both biopsy and swab specimens. The presence of Corynebacterium species at the initial visit was the microbial marker most predictive of the unfavorable clinical outcome after one-year follow-up visit. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8211761 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82117612021-06-19 Comparison Between Cultivation and Sequencing Based Approaches for Microbiota Analysis in Swabs and Biopsies of Chronic Wounds Mahnic, Aleksander Breznik, Vesna Bombek Ihan, Maja Rupnik, Maja Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Chronic wounds are a prominent health concern affecting 0.2% of individuals in the Western population. Microbial colonization and the consequent infection contribute significantly to the healing process. We have compared two methods, cultivation and 16S amplicon sequencing (16S-AS), for the characterization of bacterial populations in both swabs and biopsy tissues obtained from 45 chronic wounds. Using cultivation approach, we detected a total of 39 bacterial species, on average 2.89 per sample (SD = 1.93), compared to 5.9 (SD = 7.1) operational taxonomic units per sample obtained with 16S-AS. The concordance in detected bacteria between swab and biopsy specimens obtained from the same CWs was greater when using cultivation (58.4%) as compared to 16S-AS (25%). In the entire group of 45 biopsy samples concordance in detected bacterial genera between 16S-AS and cultivation-based approach was 36.4% and in swab samples 28.7%. Sequencing proved advantageous in comparison to the cultivation mainly in case of highly diverse microbial communities, where we could additionally detect numerous obligate and facultative anaerobic bacteria from genera Anaerococcus, Finegoldia, Porphyromonas, Morganella, and Providencia. Comparing swabs and biopsy tissues we concluded, that neither sampling method shows significant advantage over the other regardless of the method used (16S-AS or cultivation). In this study, chronic wound microbiota could be distributed into three groups based on the bacterial community diversity. The chronic wound surface area was positively correlated with bacterial diversity in swab specimens but not in biopsy tissues. Larger chronic wound surface area was also associated with the presence of Pseudomonas in both biopsy and swab specimens. The presence of Corynebacterium species at the initial visit was the microbial marker most predictive of the unfavorable clinical outcome after one-year follow-up visit. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8211761/ /pubmed/34150786 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.607255 Text en Copyright © 2021 Mahnic, Breznik, Bombek Ihan and Rupnik. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Mahnic, Aleksander Breznik, Vesna Bombek Ihan, Maja Rupnik, Maja Comparison Between Cultivation and Sequencing Based Approaches for Microbiota Analysis in Swabs and Biopsies of Chronic Wounds |
title | Comparison Between Cultivation and Sequencing Based Approaches for Microbiota Analysis in Swabs and Biopsies of Chronic Wounds |
title_full | Comparison Between Cultivation and Sequencing Based Approaches for Microbiota Analysis in Swabs and Biopsies of Chronic Wounds |
title_fullStr | Comparison Between Cultivation and Sequencing Based Approaches for Microbiota Analysis in Swabs and Biopsies of Chronic Wounds |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison Between Cultivation and Sequencing Based Approaches for Microbiota Analysis in Swabs and Biopsies of Chronic Wounds |
title_short | Comparison Between Cultivation and Sequencing Based Approaches for Microbiota Analysis in Swabs and Biopsies of Chronic Wounds |
title_sort | comparison between cultivation and sequencing based approaches for microbiota analysis in swabs and biopsies of chronic wounds |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8211761/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34150786 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.607255 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahnicaleksander comparisonbetweencultivationandsequencingbasedapproachesformicrobiotaanalysisinswabsandbiopsiesofchronicwounds AT breznikvesna comparisonbetweencultivationandsequencingbasedapproachesformicrobiotaanalysisinswabsandbiopsiesofchronicwounds AT bombekihanmaja comparisonbetweencultivationandsequencingbasedapproachesformicrobiotaanalysisinswabsandbiopsiesofchronicwounds AT rupnikmaja comparisonbetweencultivationandsequencingbasedapproachesformicrobiotaanalysisinswabsandbiopsiesofchronicwounds |