Cargando…

Comparison Between Cultivation and Sequencing Based Approaches for Microbiota Analysis in Swabs and Biopsies of Chronic Wounds

Chronic wounds are a prominent health concern affecting 0.2% of individuals in the Western population. Microbial colonization and the consequent infection contribute significantly to the healing process. We have compared two methods, cultivation and 16S amplicon sequencing (16S-AS), for the characte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahnic, Aleksander, Breznik, Vesna, Bombek Ihan, Maja, Rupnik, Maja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8211761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34150786
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.607255
_version_ 1783709535928582144
author Mahnic, Aleksander
Breznik, Vesna
Bombek Ihan, Maja
Rupnik, Maja
author_facet Mahnic, Aleksander
Breznik, Vesna
Bombek Ihan, Maja
Rupnik, Maja
author_sort Mahnic, Aleksander
collection PubMed
description Chronic wounds are a prominent health concern affecting 0.2% of individuals in the Western population. Microbial colonization and the consequent infection contribute significantly to the healing process. We have compared two methods, cultivation and 16S amplicon sequencing (16S-AS), for the characterization of bacterial populations in both swabs and biopsy tissues obtained from 45 chronic wounds. Using cultivation approach, we detected a total of 39 bacterial species, on average 2.89 per sample (SD = 1.93), compared to 5.9 (SD = 7.1) operational taxonomic units per sample obtained with 16S-AS. The concordance in detected bacteria between swab and biopsy specimens obtained from the same CWs was greater when using cultivation (58.4%) as compared to 16S-AS (25%). In the entire group of 45 biopsy samples concordance in detected bacterial genera between 16S-AS and cultivation-based approach was 36.4% and in swab samples 28.7%. Sequencing proved advantageous in comparison to the cultivation mainly in case of highly diverse microbial communities, where we could additionally detect numerous obligate and facultative anaerobic bacteria from genera Anaerococcus, Finegoldia, Porphyromonas, Morganella, and Providencia. Comparing swabs and biopsy tissues we concluded, that neither sampling method shows significant advantage over the other regardless of the method used (16S-AS or cultivation). In this study, chronic wound microbiota could be distributed into three groups based on the bacterial community diversity. The chronic wound surface area was positively correlated with bacterial diversity in swab specimens but not in biopsy tissues. Larger chronic wound surface area was also associated with the presence of Pseudomonas in both biopsy and swab specimens. The presence of Corynebacterium species at the initial visit was the microbial marker most predictive of the unfavorable clinical outcome after one-year follow-up visit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8211761
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82117612021-06-19 Comparison Between Cultivation and Sequencing Based Approaches for Microbiota Analysis in Swabs and Biopsies of Chronic Wounds Mahnic, Aleksander Breznik, Vesna Bombek Ihan, Maja Rupnik, Maja Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Chronic wounds are a prominent health concern affecting 0.2% of individuals in the Western population. Microbial colonization and the consequent infection contribute significantly to the healing process. We have compared two methods, cultivation and 16S amplicon sequencing (16S-AS), for the characterization of bacterial populations in both swabs and biopsy tissues obtained from 45 chronic wounds. Using cultivation approach, we detected a total of 39 bacterial species, on average 2.89 per sample (SD = 1.93), compared to 5.9 (SD = 7.1) operational taxonomic units per sample obtained with 16S-AS. The concordance in detected bacteria between swab and biopsy specimens obtained from the same CWs was greater when using cultivation (58.4%) as compared to 16S-AS (25%). In the entire group of 45 biopsy samples concordance in detected bacterial genera between 16S-AS and cultivation-based approach was 36.4% and in swab samples 28.7%. Sequencing proved advantageous in comparison to the cultivation mainly in case of highly diverse microbial communities, where we could additionally detect numerous obligate and facultative anaerobic bacteria from genera Anaerococcus, Finegoldia, Porphyromonas, Morganella, and Providencia. Comparing swabs and biopsy tissues we concluded, that neither sampling method shows significant advantage over the other regardless of the method used (16S-AS or cultivation). In this study, chronic wound microbiota could be distributed into three groups based on the bacterial community diversity. The chronic wound surface area was positively correlated with bacterial diversity in swab specimens but not in biopsy tissues. Larger chronic wound surface area was also associated with the presence of Pseudomonas in both biopsy and swab specimens. The presence of Corynebacterium species at the initial visit was the microbial marker most predictive of the unfavorable clinical outcome after one-year follow-up visit. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8211761/ /pubmed/34150786 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.607255 Text en Copyright © 2021 Mahnic, Breznik, Bombek Ihan and Rupnik. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Mahnic, Aleksander
Breznik, Vesna
Bombek Ihan, Maja
Rupnik, Maja
Comparison Between Cultivation and Sequencing Based Approaches for Microbiota Analysis in Swabs and Biopsies of Chronic Wounds
title Comparison Between Cultivation and Sequencing Based Approaches for Microbiota Analysis in Swabs and Biopsies of Chronic Wounds
title_full Comparison Between Cultivation and Sequencing Based Approaches for Microbiota Analysis in Swabs and Biopsies of Chronic Wounds
title_fullStr Comparison Between Cultivation and Sequencing Based Approaches for Microbiota Analysis in Swabs and Biopsies of Chronic Wounds
title_full_unstemmed Comparison Between Cultivation and Sequencing Based Approaches for Microbiota Analysis in Swabs and Biopsies of Chronic Wounds
title_short Comparison Between Cultivation and Sequencing Based Approaches for Microbiota Analysis in Swabs and Biopsies of Chronic Wounds
title_sort comparison between cultivation and sequencing based approaches for microbiota analysis in swabs and biopsies of chronic wounds
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8211761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34150786
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.607255
work_keys_str_mv AT mahnicaleksander comparisonbetweencultivationandsequencingbasedapproachesformicrobiotaanalysisinswabsandbiopsiesofchronicwounds
AT breznikvesna comparisonbetweencultivationandsequencingbasedapproachesformicrobiotaanalysisinswabsandbiopsiesofchronicwounds
AT bombekihanmaja comparisonbetweencultivationandsequencingbasedapproachesformicrobiotaanalysisinswabsandbiopsiesofchronicwounds
AT rupnikmaja comparisonbetweencultivationandsequencingbasedapproachesformicrobiotaanalysisinswabsandbiopsiesofchronicwounds