Cargando…

A systematic review of prediction models to diagnose COVID-19 in adults admitted to healthcare centers

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic is putting significant pressure on the hospital system. To help clinicians in the rapid triage of patients at high risk of COVID-19 while waiting for RT-PCR results, different diagnostic prediction models have been developed. Our objective is to identify, compare, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Locquet, Médéa, Diep, Anh Nguyet, Beaudart, Charlotte, Dardenne, Nadia, Brabant, Christian, Bruyère, Olivier, Donneau, Anne-Françoise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8211973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34144711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13690-021-00630-3
_version_ 1783709582926807040
author Locquet, Médéa
Diep, Anh Nguyet
Beaudart, Charlotte
Dardenne, Nadia
Brabant, Christian
Bruyère, Olivier
Donneau, Anne-Françoise
author_facet Locquet, Médéa
Diep, Anh Nguyet
Beaudart, Charlotte
Dardenne, Nadia
Brabant, Christian
Bruyère, Olivier
Donneau, Anne-Françoise
author_sort Locquet, Médéa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic is putting significant pressure on the hospital system. To help clinicians in the rapid triage of patients at high risk of COVID-19 while waiting for RT-PCR results, different diagnostic prediction models have been developed. Our objective is to identify, compare, and evaluate performances of prediction models for the diagnosis of COVID-19 in adult patients in a health care setting. METHODS: A search for relevant references has been conducted on the MEDLINE and Scopus databases. Rigorous eligibility criteria have been established (e.g., adult participants, suspicion of COVID-19, medical setting) and applied by two independent investigators to identify suitable studies at 2 different stages: (1) titles and abstracts screening and (2) full-texts screening. Risk of bias (RoB) has been assessed using the Prediction model study Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). Data synthesis has been presented according to a narrative report of findings. RESULTS: Out of the 2334 references identified by the literature search, 13 articles have been included in our systematic review. The studies, carried out all over the world, were performed in 2020. The included articles proposed a model developed using different methods, namely, logistic regression, score, machine learning, XGBoost. All the included models performed well to discriminate adults at high risks of presenting COVID-19 (all area under the ROC curve (AUROC) > 0.500). The best AUROC was observed for the model of Kurstjens et al (AUROC = 0.940 (0.910–0.960), which was also the model that achieved the highest sensitivity (98%). RoB was evaluated as low in general. CONCLUSION: Thirteen models have been developed since the start of the pandemic in order to diagnose COVID-19 in suspected patients from health care centers. All these models are effective, to varying degrees, in identifying whether patients were at high risk of having COVID-19. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13690-021-00630-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8211973
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82119732021-06-21 A systematic review of prediction models to diagnose COVID-19 in adults admitted to healthcare centers Locquet, Médéa Diep, Anh Nguyet Beaudart, Charlotte Dardenne, Nadia Brabant, Christian Bruyère, Olivier Donneau, Anne-Françoise Arch Public Health Systematic Review BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic is putting significant pressure on the hospital system. To help clinicians in the rapid triage of patients at high risk of COVID-19 while waiting for RT-PCR results, different diagnostic prediction models have been developed. Our objective is to identify, compare, and evaluate performances of prediction models for the diagnosis of COVID-19 in adult patients in a health care setting. METHODS: A search for relevant references has been conducted on the MEDLINE and Scopus databases. Rigorous eligibility criteria have been established (e.g., adult participants, suspicion of COVID-19, medical setting) and applied by two independent investigators to identify suitable studies at 2 different stages: (1) titles and abstracts screening and (2) full-texts screening. Risk of bias (RoB) has been assessed using the Prediction model study Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). Data synthesis has been presented according to a narrative report of findings. RESULTS: Out of the 2334 references identified by the literature search, 13 articles have been included in our systematic review. The studies, carried out all over the world, were performed in 2020. The included articles proposed a model developed using different methods, namely, logistic regression, score, machine learning, XGBoost. All the included models performed well to discriminate adults at high risks of presenting COVID-19 (all area under the ROC curve (AUROC) > 0.500). The best AUROC was observed for the model of Kurstjens et al (AUROC = 0.940 (0.910–0.960), which was also the model that achieved the highest sensitivity (98%). RoB was evaluated as low in general. CONCLUSION: Thirteen models have been developed since the start of the pandemic in order to diagnose COVID-19 in suspected patients from health care centers. All these models are effective, to varying degrees, in identifying whether patients were at high risk of having COVID-19. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13690-021-00630-3. BioMed Central 2021-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8211973/ /pubmed/34144711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13690-021-00630-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Locquet, Médéa
Diep, Anh Nguyet
Beaudart, Charlotte
Dardenne, Nadia
Brabant, Christian
Bruyère, Olivier
Donneau, Anne-Françoise
A systematic review of prediction models to diagnose COVID-19 in adults admitted to healthcare centers
title A systematic review of prediction models to diagnose COVID-19 in adults admitted to healthcare centers
title_full A systematic review of prediction models to diagnose COVID-19 in adults admitted to healthcare centers
title_fullStr A systematic review of prediction models to diagnose COVID-19 in adults admitted to healthcare centers
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of prediction models to diagnose COVID-19 in adults admitted to healthcare centers
title_short A systematic review of prediction models to diagnose COVID-19 in adults admitted to healthcare centers
title_sort systematic review of prediction models to diagnose covid-19 in adults admitted to healthcare centers
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8211973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34144711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13690-021-00630-3
work_keys_str_mv AT locquetmedea asystematicreviewofpredictionmodelstodiagnosecovid19inadultsadmittedtohealthcarecenters
AT diepanhnguyet asystematicreviewofpredictionmodelstodiagnosecovid19inadultsadmittedtohealthcarecenters
AT beaudartcharlotte asystematicreviewofpredictionmodelstodiagnosecovid19inadultsadmittedtohealthcarecenters
AT dardennenadia asystematicreviewofpredictionmodelstodiagnosecovid19inadultsadmittedtohealthcarecenters
AT brabantchristian asystematicreviewofpredictionmodelstodiagnosecovid19inadultsadmittedtohealthcarecenters
AT bruyereolivier asystematicreviewofpredictionmodelstodiagnosecovid19inadultsadmittedtohealthcarecenters
AT donneauannefrancoise asystematicreviewofpredictionmodelstodiagnosecovid19inadultsadmittedtohealthcarecenters
AT locquetmedea systematicreviewofpredictionmodelstodiagnosecovid19inadultsadmittedtohealthcarecenters
AT diepanhnguyet systematicreviewofpredictionmodelstodiagnosecovid19inadultsadmittedtohealthcarecenters
AT beaudartcharlotte systematicreviewofpredictionmodelstodiagnosecovid19inadultsadmittedtohealthcarecenters
AT dardennenadia systematicreviewofpredictionmodelstodiagnosecovid19inadultsadmittedtohealthcarecenters
AT brabantchristian systematicreviewofpredictionmodelstodiagnosecovid19inadultsadmittedtohealthcarecenters
AT bruyereolivier systematicreviewofpredictionmodelstodiagnosecovid19inadultsadmittedtohealthcarecenters
AT donneauannefrancoise systematicreviewofpredictionmodelstodiagnosecovid19inadultsadmittedtohealthcarecenters