Cargando…

Long‐term consequences in critically ill COVID‐19 patients: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: COVID‐19 can cause severe disease with need of treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU) for several weeks. Increased knowledge is needed about the long‐term consequences. METHODS: This is a single‐center prospective follow‐up study of COVID‐19 patients admitted to the ICU for respirato...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schandl, Anna, Hedman, Anders, Lyngå, Patrik, Fathi Tachinabad, Sozan, Svefors, Jessica, Roël, Mari, Geborek, Anne, Andersson Franko, Mikael, Söderberg, Mårten, Joelsson‐Alm, Eva, Darlington, Pernilla
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8212104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34097753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aas.13939
_version_ 1783709607427833856
author Schandl, Anna
Hedman, Anders
Lyngå, Patrik
Fathi Tachinabad, Sozan
Svefors, Jessica
Roël, Mari
Geborek, Anne
Andersson Franko, Mikael
Söderberg, Mårten
Joelsson‐Alm, Eva
Darlington, Pernilla
author_facet Schandl, Anna
Hedman, Anders
Lyngå, Patrik
Fathi Tachinabad, Sozan
Svefors, Jessica
Roël, Mari
Geborek, Anne
Andersson Franko, Mikael
Söderberg, Mårten
Joelsson‐Alm, Eva
Darlington, Pernilla
author_sort Schandl, Anna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: COVID‐19 can cause severe disease with need of treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU) for several weeks. Increased knowledge is needed about the long‐term consequences. METHODS: This is a single‐center prospective follow‐up study of COVID‐19 patients admitted to the ICU for respiratory organ support between March and July 2020. Patients with invasive ventilation were compared with those with high‐flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) or non‐invasive ventilation (NIV) regarding functional outcome and health‐related qualify of life. The mean follow‐up time was 5 months after ICU discharge and included clinical history, three well‐validated questionnaires about health‐related quality of life and psychological health, pulmonary function test, 6‐minute walk test (6MWT) and work ability. Data were analyzed with multivariable general linear and logistic regression models with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Among 248 ICU patients, 200 patients survived. Of these, 113 patients came for follow‐up. Seventy patients (62%) had received invasive ventilation. Most patients reported impaired health‐related quality of life. Approximately one‐third suffered from post‐traumatic stress, anxiety and depression. Twenty‐six percent had reduced total lung capacity, 34% had reduced 6MWT and 50% worked fulltime. The outcomes were similar regardless of ventilatory support, but invasive ventilation was associated with more bodily pain (MSD −19, 95% CI: −32 to −5) and <80% total lung capacity (OR 4.1, 95% CI: 1.3‐16.5). CONCLUSION: Among survivors of COVID‐19 who required respiratory organ support, outcomes 5 months after discharge from ICU were largely similar among those requiring invasive compared to non‐invasive ventilation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8212104
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82121042021-06-21 Long‐term consequences in critically ill COVID‐19 patients: A prospective cohort study Schandl, Anna Hedman, Anders Lyngå, Patrik Fathi Tachinabad, Sozan Svefors, Jessica Roël, Mari Geborek, Anne Andersson Franko, Mikael Söderberg, Mårten Joelsson‐Alm, Eva Darlington, Pernilla Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Intensive Care and Physiology BACKGROUND: COVID‐19 can cause severe disease with need of treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU) for several weeks. Increased knowledge is needed about the long‐term consequences. METHODS: This is a single‐center prospective follow‐up study of COVID‐19 patients admitted to the ICU for respiratory organ support between March and July 2020. Patients with invasive ventilation were compared with those with high‐flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) or non‐invasive ventilation (NIV) regarding functional outcome and health‐related qualify of life. The mean follow‐up time was 5 months after ICU discharge and included clinical history, three well‐validated questionnaires about health‐related quality of life and psychological health, pulmonary function test, 6‐minute walk test (6MWT) and work ability. Data were analyzed with multivariable general linear and logistic regression models with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Among 248 ICU patients, 200 patients survived. Of these, 113 patients came for follow‐up. Seventy patients (62%) had received invasive ventilation. Most patients reported impaired health‐related quality of life. Approximately one‐third suffered from post‐traumatic stress, anxiety and depression. Twenty‐six percent had reduced total lung capacity, 34% had reduced 6MWT and 50% worked fulltime. The outcomes were similar regardless of ventilatory support, but invasive ventilation was associated with more bodily pain (MSD −19, 95% CI: −32 to −5) and <80% total lung capacity (OR 4.1, 95% CI: 1.3‐16.5). CONCLUSION: Among survivors of COVID‐19 who required respiratory organ support, outcomes 5 months after discharge from ICU were largely similar among those requiring invasive compared to non‐invasive ventilation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-25 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8212104/ /pubmed/34097753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aas.13939 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Intensive Care and Physiology
Schandl, Anna
Hedman, Anders
Lyngå, Patrik
Fathi Tachinabad, Sozan
Svefors, Jessica
Roël, Mari
Geborek, Anne
Andersson Franko, Mikael
Söderberg, Mårten
Joelsson‐Alm, Eva
Darlington, Pernilla
Long‐term consequences in critically ill COVID‐19 patients: A prospective cohort study
title Long‐term consequences in critically ill COVID‐19 patients: A prospective cohort study
title_full Long‐term consequences in critically ill COVID‐19 patients: A prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Long‐term consequences in critically ill COVID‐19 patients: A prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Long‐term consequences in critically ill COVID‐19 patients: A prospective cohort study
title_short Long‐term consequences in critically ill COVID‐19 patients: A prospective cohort study
title_sort long‐term consequences in critically ill covid‐19 patients: a prospective cohort study
topic Intensive Care and Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8212104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34097753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aas.13939
work_keys_str_mv AT schandlanna longtermconsequencesincriticallyillcovid19patientsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT hedmananders longtermconsequencesincriticallyillcovid19patientsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT lyngapatrik longtermconsequencesincriticallyillcovid19patientsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT fathitachinabadsozan longtermconsequencesincriticallyillcovid19patientsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT sveforsjessica longtermconsequencesincriticallyillcovid19patientsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT roelmari longtermconsequencesincriticallyillcovid19patientsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT geborekanne longtermconsequencesincriticallyillcovid19patientsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT anderssonfrankomikael longtermconsequencesincriticallyillcovid19patientsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT soderbergmarten longtermconsequencesincriticallyillcovid19patientsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT joelssonalmeva longtermconsequencesincriticallyillcovid19patientsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT darlingtonpernilla longtermconsequencesincriticallyillcovid19patientsaprospectivecohortstudy