Cargando…

A patient-centred web-based adverse drug reaction reporting system identifies not yet labelled potential safety issues

PURPOSE: Reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) by patients is essential for a comprehensive risk–benefit evaluation of drugs after marketing, but only few data are available regarding patient-centred web-based ADR reporting systems. Hence, we aimed to analyze ADRs reported by patients with a pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasford, J., Bruchmann, F., Lutz, M., Thürmann, P., Schmiedl, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8212270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34143228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-021-03134-9
_version_ 1783709619844022272
author Hasford, J.
Bruchmann, F.
Lutz, M.
Thürmann, P.
Schmiedl, S.
author_facet Hasford, J.
Bruchmann, F.
Lutz, M.
Thürmann, P.
Schmiedl, S.
author_sort Hasford, J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) by patients is essential for a comprehensive risk–benefit evaluation of drugs after marketing, but only few data are available regarding patient-centred web-based ADR reporting systems. Hence, we aimed to analyze ADRs reported by patients with a particular emphasis on novel drugs and serious ADRs not yet labelled in the respective summary of product characteristics (SPC). METHODS: All ADR reports received by a web-based, patient-centred platform (www.nebenwirkungen.de) between April 1, 2019, and September 1, 2020, were descriptively analyzed. ADRs and drugs were coded automatically according to MedDRA and ATC classification system. SPC labelling of reported ADRs for novel drugs marketed since 2015 was checked manually. RESULTS: In total, 13,515 patient reports including 29,529 ADRs were received during the study period (serious ADRs [SADRs] n = 1,318; 4.5%). Women were affected in more than two-thirds of ADR reports. The most common patient-reported ADRs were nausea, dizziness and headache, whereas arrhythmia, intestinal obstruction and erectile dysfunction were the most frequent SADRs. Ciprofloxacin, levothyroxine and venlafaxine were the compounds most frequently suspected for causing both ADRs and SADRs. Regarding novel compounds, 289 reports including 739 ADRs were received (mainly fatigue, headache and myalgia). Three hundred thirty-one (44.8%) out of those ADRs were not yet labelled in the respective SPC, whereof twelve were SADRs. CONCLUSION: The majority of patient-reported ADRs were non-serious. However, a relevant number of non-labelled even serious ADRs was reported for novel compounds by patients. Despite well-known limitations of patient-reported ADRs, this web-based ADR reporting system contributes to the identification of new ADRs and thus can help to improve patients’ safety complementing other pharmacovigilance instruments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00228-021-03134-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8212270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82122702021-06-21 A patient-centred web-based adverse drug reaction reporting system identifies not yet labelled potential safety issues Hasford, J. Bruchmann, F. Lutz, M. Thürmann, P. Schmiedl, S. Eur J Clin Pharmacol Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription PURPOSE: Reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) by patients is essential for a comprehensive risk–benefit evaluation of drugs after marketing, but only few data are available regarding patient-centred web-based ADR reporting systems. Hence, we aimed to analyze ADRs reported by patients with a particular emphasis on novel drugs and serious ADRs not yet labelled in the respective summary of product characteristics (SPC). METHODS: All ADR reports received by a web-based, patient-centred platform (www.nebenwirkungen.de) between April 1, 2019, and September 1, 2020, were descriptively analyzed. ADRs and drugs were coded automatically according to MedDRA and ATC classification system. SPC labelling of reported ADRs for novel drugs marketed since 2015 was checked manually. RESULTS: In total, 13,515 patient reports including 29,529 ADRs were received during the study period (serious ADRs [SADRs] n = 1,318; 4.5%). Women were affected in more than two-thirds of ADR reports. The most common patient-reported ADRs were nausea, dizziness and headache, whereas arrhythmia, intestinal obstruction and erectile dysfunction were the most frequent SADRs. Ciprofloxacin, levothyroxine and venlafaxine were the compounds most frequently suspected for causing both ADRs and SADRs. Regarding novel compounds, 289 reports including 739 ADRs were received (mainly fatigue, headache and myalgia). Three hundred thirty-one (44.8%) out of those ADRs were not yet labelled in the respective SPC, whereof twelve were SADRs. CONCLUSION: The majority of patient-reported ADRs were non-serious. However, a relevant number of non-labelled even serious ADRs was reported for novel compounds by patients. Despite well-known limitations of patient-reported ADRs, this web-based ADR reporting system contributes to the identification of new ADRs and thus can help to improve patients’ safety complementing other pharmacovigilance instruments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00228-021-03134-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-18 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8212270/ /pubmed/34143228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-021-03134-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription
Hasford, J.
Bruchmann, F.
Lutz, M.
Thürmann, P.
Schmiedl, S.
A patient-centred web-based adverse drug reaction reporting system identifies not yet labelled potential safety issues
title A patient-centred web-based adverse drug reaction reporting system identifies not yet labelled potential safety issues
title_full A patient-centred web-based adverse drug reaction reporting system identifies not yet labelled potential safety issues
title_fullStr A patient-centred web-based adverse drug reaction reporting system identifies not yet labelled potential safety issues
title_full_unstemmed A patient-centred web-based adverse drug reaction reporting system identifies not yet labelled potential safety issues
title_short A patient-centred web-based adverse drug reaction reporting system identifies not yet labelled potential safety issues
title_sort patient-centred web-based adverse drug reaction reporting system identifies not yet labelled potential safety issues
topic Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8212270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34143228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-021-03134-9
work_keys_str_mv AT hasfordj apatientcentredwebbasedadversedrugreactionreportingsystemidentifiesnotyetlabelledpotentialsafetyissues
AT bruchmannf apatientcentredwebbasedadversedrugreactionreportingsystemidentifiesnotyetlabelledpotentialsafetyissues
AT lutzm apatientcentredwebbasedadversedrugreactionreportingsystemidentifiesnotyetlabelledpotentialsafetyissues
AT thurmannp apatientcentredwebbasedadversedrugreactionreportingsystemidentifiesnotyetlabelledpotentialsafetyissues
AT schmiedls apatientcentredwebbasedadversedrugreactionreportingsystemidentifiesnotyetlabelledpotentialsafetyissues
AT hasfordj patientcentredwebbasedadversedrugreactionreportingsystemidentifiesnotyetlabelledpotentialsafetyissues
AT bruchmannf patientcentredwebbasedadversedrugreactionreportingsystemidentifiesnotyetlabelledpotentialsafetyissues
AT lutzm patientcentredwebbasedadversedrugreactionreportingsystemidentifiesnotyetlabelledpotentialsafetyissues
AT thurmannp patientcentredwebbasedadversedrugreactionreportingsystemidentifiesnotyetlabelledpotentialsafetyissues
AT schmiedls patientcentredwebbasedadversedrugreactionreportingsystemidentifiesnotyetlabelledpotentialsafetyissues