Cargando…
A patient-centred web-based adverse drug reaction reporting system identifies not yet labelled potential safety issues
PURPOSE: Reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) by patients is essential for a comprehensive risk–benefit evaluation of drugs after marketing, but only few data are available regarding patient-centred web-based ADR reporting systems. Hence, we aimed to analyze ADRs reported by patients with a pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8212270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34143228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-021-03134-9 |
_version_ | 1783709619844022272 |
---|---|
author | Hasford, J. Bruchmann, F. Lutz, M. Thürmann, P. Schmiedl, S. |
author_facet | Hasford, J. Bruchmann, F. Lutz, M. Thürmann, P. Schmiedl, S. |
author_sort | Hasford, J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) by patients is essential for a comprehensive risk–benefit evaluation of drugs after marketing, but only few data are available regarding patient-centred web-based ADR reporting systems. Hence, we aimed to analyze ADRs reported by patients with a particular emphasis on novel drugs and serious ADRs not yet labelled in the respective summary of product characteristics (SPC). METHODS: All ADR reports received by a web-based, patient-centred platform (www.nebenwirkungen.de) between April 1, 2019, and September 1, 2020, were descriptively analyzed. ADRs and drugs were coded automatically according to MedDRA and ATC classification system. SPC labelling of reported ADRs for novel drugs marketed since 2015 was checked manually. RESULTS: In total, 13,515 patient reports including 29,529 ADRs were received during the study period (serious ADRs [SADRs] n = 1,318; 4.5%). Women were affected in more than two-thirds of ADR reports. The most common patient-reported ADRs were nausea, dizziness and headache, whereas arrhythmia, intestinal obstruction and erectile dysfunction were the most frequent SADRs. Ciprofloxacin, levothyroxine and venlafaxine were the compounds most frequently suspected for causing both ADRs and SADRs. Regarding novel compounds, 289 reports including 739 ADRs were received (mainly fatigue, headache and myalgia). Three hundred thirty-one (44.8%) out of those ADRs were not yet labelled in the respective SPC, whereof twelve were SADRs. CONCLUSION: The majority of patient-reported ADRs were non-serious. However, a relevant number of non-labelled even serious ADRs was reported for novel compounds by patients. Despite well-known limitations of patient-reported ADRs, this web-based ADR reporting system contributes to the identification of new ADRs and thus can help to improve patients’ safety complementing other pharmacovigilance instruments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00228-021-03134-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8212270 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82122702021-06-21 A patient-centred web-based adverse drug reaction reporting system identifies not yet labelled potential safety issues Hasford, J. Bruchmann, F. Lutz, M. Thürmann, P. Schmiedl, S. Eur J Clin Pharmacol Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription PURPOSE: Reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) by patients is essential for a comprehensive risk–benefit evaluation of drugs after marketing, but only few data are available regarding patient-centred web-based ADR reporting systems. Hence, we aimed to analyze ADRs reported by patients with a particular emphasis on novel drugs and serious ADRs not yet labelled in the respective summary of product characteristics (SPC). METHODS: All ADR reports received by a web-based, patient-centred platform (www.nebenwirkungen.de) between April 1, 2019, and September 1, 2020, were descriptively analyzed. ADRs and drugs were coded automatically according to MedDRA and ATC classification system. SPC labelling of reported ADRs for novel drugs marketed since 2015 was checked manually. RESULTS: In total, 13,515 patient reports including 29,529 ADRs were received during the study period (serious ADRs [SADRs] n = 1,318; 4.5%). Women were affected in more than two-thirds of ADR reports. The most common patient-reported ADRs were nausea, dizziness and headache, whereas arrhythmia, intestinal obstruction and erectile dysfunction were the most frequent SADRs. Ciprofloxacin, levothyroxine and venlafaxine were the compounds most frequently suspected for causing both ADRs and SADRs. Regarding novel compounds, 289 reports including 739 ADRs were received (mainly fatigue, headache and myalgia). Three hundred thirty-one (44.8%) out of those ADRs were not yet labelled in the respective SPC, whereof twelve were SADRs. CONCLUSION: The majority of patient-reported ADRs were non-serious. However, a relevant number of non-labelled even serious ADRs was reported for novel compounds by patients. Despite well-known limitations of patient-reported ADRs, this web-based ADR reporting system contributes to the identification of new ADRs and thus can help to improve patients’ safety complementing other pharmacovigilance instruments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00228-021-03134-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-18 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8212270/ /pubmed/34143228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-021-03134-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription Hasford, J. Bruchmann, F. Lutz, M. Thürmann, P. Schmiedl, S. A patient-centred web-based adverse drug reaction reporting system identifies not yet labelled potential safety issues |
title | A patient-centred web-based adverse drug reaction reporting system identifies not yet labelled potential safety issues |
title_full | A patient-centred web-based adverse drug reaction reporting system identifies not yet labelled potential safety issues |
title_fullStr | A patient-centred web-based adverse drug reaction reporting system identifies not yet labelled potential safety issues |
title_full_unstemmed | A patient-centred web-based adverse drug reaction reporting system identifies not yet labelled potential safety issues |
title_short | A patient-centred web-based adverse drug reaction reporting system identifies not yet labelled potential safety issues |
title_sort | patient-centred web-based adverse drug reaction reporting system identifies not yet labelled potential safety issues |
topic | Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8212270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34143228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-021-03134-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hasfordj apatientcentredwebbasedadversedrugreactionreportingsystemidentifiesnotyetlabelledpotentialsafetyissues AT bruchmannf apatientcentredwebbasedadversedrugreactionreportingsystemidentifiesnotyetlabelledpotentialsafetyissues AT lutzm apatientcentredwebbasedadversedrugreactionreportingsystemidentifiesnotyetlabelledpotentialsafetyissues AT thurmannp apatientcentredwebbasedadversedrugreactionreportingsystemidentifiesnotyetlabelledpotentialsafetyissues AT schmiedls apatientcentredwebbasedadversedrugreactionreportingsystemidentifiesnotyetlabelledpotentialsafetyissues AT hasfordj patientcentredwebbasedadversedrugreactionreportingsystemidentifiesnotyetlabelledpotentialsafetyissues AT bruchmannf patientcentredwebbasedadversedrugreactionreportingsystemidentifiesnotyetlabelledpotentialsafetyissues AT lutzm patientcentredwebbasedadversedrugreactionreportingsystemidentifiesnotyetlabelledpotentialsafetyissues AT thurmannp patientcentredwebbasedadversedrugreactionreportingsystemidentifiesnotyetlabelledpotentialsafetyissues AT schmiedls patientcentredwebbasedadversedrugreactionreportingsystemidentifiesnotyetlabelledpotentialsafetyissues |