Cargando…

Distinct processes of lighting priors for lightness and 3-D shape perception

The visual system often relies on prior assumptions when interpreting ambiguous visual inputs. A well-known example is the light-from-above prior, which aids the judgment of an object's three-dimensional (3-D) shape (i.e., convex or concave). Recent studies have revealed that the light-from-abo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kobayashi, Yuki, Zavagno, Daniele, Morikawa, Kazunori
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8212428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34096984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.6.1
_version_ 1783709636752310272
author Kobayashi, Yuki
Zavagno, Daniele
Morikawa, Kazunori
author_facet Kobayashi, Yuki
Zavagno, Daniele
Morikawa, Kazunori
author_sort Kobayashi, Yuki
collection PubMed
description The visual system often relies on prior assumptions when interpreting ambiguous visual inputs. A well-known example is the light-from-above prior, which aids the judgment of an object's three-dimensional (3-D) shape (i.e., convex or concave). Recent studies have revealed that the light-from-above prior also helps solve lightness ambiguity. This study aimed to examine whether 3-D shape perception and lightness perception share the same lighting prior. The study participants performed two tasks: one focusing on lightness perception and another focusing on 3-D shape perception. The dominant directions of the assumed lighting were calculated from participants’ performance in the two tasks. The results showed that the assumed lighting direction for 3-D shape perception were considerably biased toward the left, whereas the one for lightness perception was almost from directly above. The clear difference between these two directions supports the hypothesis that the visual system uses distinct lighting priors for 3-D shape perception and lightness perception. Experiments 1 and 2 involved Japanese speaking participants and European participants, respectively. The Japanese language can be read and written both horizontally (i.e., left to right) and vertically (i.e., up to down) with lines progressing from right to left. Nevertheless, the two experiments still produced the same result, which suggests that the present finding is universal regardless of reading/writing direction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8212428
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82124282021-06-22 Distinct processes of lighting priors for lightness and 3-D shape perception Kobayashi, Yuki Zavagno, Daniele Morikawa, Kazunori J Vis Article The visual system often relies on prior assumptions when interpreting ambiguous visual inputs. A well-known example is the light-from-above prior, which aids the judgment of an object's three-dimensional (3-D) shape (i.e., convex or concave). Recent studies have revealed that the light-from-above prior also helps solve lightness ambiguity. This study aimed to examine whether 3-D shape perception and lightness perception share the same lighting prior. The study participants performed two tasks: one focusing on lightness perception and another focusing on 3-D shape perception. The dominant directions of the assumed lighting were calculated from participants’ performance in the two tasks. The results showed that the assumed lighting direction for 3-D shape perception were considerably biased toward the left, whereas the one for lightness perception was almost from directly above. The clear difference between these two directions supports the hypothesis that the visual system uses distinct lighting priors for 3-D shape perception and lightness perception. Experiments 1 and 2 involved Japanese speaking participants and European participants, respectively. The Japanese language can be read and written both horizontally (i.e., left to right) and vertically (i.e., up to down) with lines progressing from right to left. Nevertheless, the two experiments still produced the same result, which suggests that the present finding is universal regardless of reading/writing direction. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8212428/ /pubmed/34096984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.6.1 Text en Copyright 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Kobayashi, Yuki
Zavagno, Daniele
Morikawa, Kazunori
Distinct processes of lighting priors for lightness and 3-D shape perception
title Distinct processes of lighting priors for lightness and 3-D shape perception
title_full Distinct processes of lighting priors for lightness and 3-D shape perception
title_fullStr Distinct processes of lighting priors for lightness and 3-D shape perception
title_full_unstemmed Distinct processes of lighting priors for lightness and 3-D shape perception
title_short Distinct processes of lighting priors for lightness and 3-D shape perception
title_sort distinct processes of lighting priors for lightness and 3-d shape perception
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8212428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34096984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.6.1
work_keys_str_mv AT kobayashiyuki distinctprocessesoflightingpriorsforlightnessand3dshapeperception
AT zavagnodaniele distinctprocessesoflightingpriorsforlightnessand3dshapeperception
AT morikawakazunori distinctprocessesoflightingpriorsforlightnessand3dshapeperception