Cargando…

How much improvement can satisfy patients? Exploring patients’ satisfaction 3 years after total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: Despite the innovations in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there is still a subset of patients who do not acquire significant relief or expected satisfaction after primary TKA. However, this subgroup of patients still gains improvements more or less in terms of objective or quantified ass...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fan, Xiao Yu, Ma, Jin Hui, Wu, Xinjie, Xu, Xin, Shi, Lijun, Li, Tengqi, Wang, Peixu, Li, Chengxin, Li, Zhizhuo, Zhang, Qing Yu, Sun, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8212506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34140037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02514-2
_version_ 1783709652248166400
author Fan, Xiao Yu
Ma, Jin Hui
Wu, Xinjie
Xu, Xin
Shi, Lijun
Li, Tengqi
Wang, Peixu
Li, Chengxin
Li, Zhizhuo
Zhang, Qing Yu
Sun, Wei
author_facet Fan, Xiao Yu
Ma, Jin Hui
Wu, Xinjie
Xu, Xin
Shi, Lijun
Li, Tengqi
Wang, Peixu
Li, Chengxin
Li, Zhizhuo
Zhang, Qing Yu
Sun, Wei
author_sort Fan, Xiao Yu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the innovations in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there is still a subset of patients who do not acquire significant relief or expected satisfaction after primary TKA. However, this subgroup of patients still gains improvements more or less in terms of objective or quantified assessments after the procedure. The purpose of our study is to explore the factors that correlate with patients’ satisfaction and identify minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and minimum important change (MIC) in clinical parameters. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 161 patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis who underwent unilateral total knee arthroplasty from January 2017 to December 2017. We collected the following parameters: body mass index (BMI), duration of disease, education level, depression state, preoperative flexion contracture angle of knee, HSS scores, 11-point NRS scores, and radiological parameters (preoperative minimal joint space width and varus angle of knee). The satisfaction was graded by self-reported scores in percentage (0–100). RESULTS: We revealed that 80.8% of patients were satisfied 3 years overall after primary TKA. HSS score change, NRS-Walking score change, age, and pre-mJSW showed significant difference between satisfied and dissatisfied group. The varus angle change revealed statistical significance according to the levels of satisfaction. Simple linear regression identified the MCID for HSS score to be 5.41 and for the NRS-Walking to be 1.24. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve identified the MIC for HSS score to be 25.5 and for the NRS-Walking score to be 6.5. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, we identified several factors that correlated with patients’ satisfaction independently after TKA in a long term. In addition, we revealed the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and minimum important change (MIC) for HSS and NRS score in these patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02514-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8212506
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82125062021-06-22 How much improvement can satisfy patients? Exploring patients’ satisfaction 3 years after total knee arthroplasty Fan, Xiao Yu Ma, Jin Hui Wu, Xinjie Xu, Xin Shi, Lijun Li, Tengqi Wang, Peixu Li, Chengxin Li, Zhizhuo Zhang, Qing Yu Sun, Wei J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite the innovations in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there is still a subset of patients who do not acquire significant relief or expected satisfaction after primary TKA. However, this subgroup of patients still gains improvements more or less in terms of objective or quantified assessments after the procedure. The purpose of our study is to explore the factors that correlate with patients’ satisfaction and identify minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and minimum important change (MIC) in clinical parameters. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 161 patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis who underwent unilateral total knee arthroplasty from January 2017 to December 2017. We collected the following parameters: body mass index (BMI), duration of disease, education level, depression state, preoperative flexion contracture angle of knee, HSS scores, 11-point NRS scores, and radiological parameters (preoperative minimal joint space width and varus angle of knee). The satisfaction was graded by self-reported scores in percentage (0–100). RESULTS: We revealed that 80.8% of patients were satisfied 3 years overall after primary TKA. HSS score change, NRS-Walking score change, age, and pre-mJSW showed significant difference between satisfied and dissatisfied group. The varus angle change revealed statistical significance according to the levels of satisfaction. Simple linear regression identified the MCID for HSS score to be 5.41 and for the NRS-Walking to be 1.24. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve identified the MIC for HSS score to be 25.5 and for the NRS-Walking score to be 6.5. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, we identified several factors that correlated with patients’ satisfaction independently after TKA in a long term. In addition, we revealed the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and minimum important change (MIC) for HSS and NRS score in these patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02514-2. BioMed Central 2021-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8212506/ /pubmed/34140037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02514-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fan, Xiao Yu
Ma, Jin Hui
Wu, Xinjie
Xu, Xin
Shi, Lijun
Li, Tengqi
Wang, Peixu
Li, Chengxin
Li, Zhizhuo
Zhang, Qing Yu
Sun, Wei
How much improvement can satisfy patients? Exploring patients’ satisfaction 3 years after total knee arthroplasty
title How much improvement can satisfy patients? Exploring patients’ satisfaction 3 years after total knee arthroplasty
title_full How much improvement can satisfy patients? Exploring patients’ satisfaction 3 years after total knee arthroplasty
title_fullStr How much improvement can satisfy patients? Exploring patients’ satisfaction 3 years after total knee arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed How much improvement can satisfy patients? Exploring patients’ satisfaction 3 years after total knee arthroplasty
title_short How much improvement can satisfy patients? Exploring patients’ satisfaction 3 years after total knee arthroplasty
title_sort how much improvement can satisfy patients? exploring patients’ satisfaction 3 years after total knee arthroplasty
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8212506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34140037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02514-2
work_keys_str_mv AT fanxiaoyu howmuchimprovementcansatisfypatientsexploringpatientssatisfaction3yearsaftertotalkneearthroplasty
AT majinhui howmuchimprovementcansatisfypatientsexploringpatientssatisfaction3yearsaftertotalkneearthroplasty
AT wuxinjie howmuchimprovementcansatisfypatientsexploringpatientssatisfaction3yearsaftertotalkneearthroplasty
AT xuxin howmuchimprovementcansatisfypatientsexploringpatientssatisfaction3yearsaftertotalkneearthroplasty
AT shilijun howmuchimprovementcansatisfypatientsexploringpatientssatisfaction3yearsaftertotalkneearthroplasty
AT litengqi howmuchimprovementcansatisfypatientsexploringpatientssatisfaction3yearsaftertotalkneearthroplasty
AT wangpeixu howmuchimprovementcansatisfypatientsexploringpatientssatisfaction3yearsaftertotalkneearthroplasty
AT lichengxin howmuchimprovementcansatisfypatientsexploringpatientssatisfaction3yearsaftertotalkneearthroplasty
AT lizhizhuo howmuchimprovementcansatisfypatientsexploringpatientssatisfaction3yearsaftertotalkneearthroplasty
AT zhangqingyu howmuchimprovementcansatisfypatientsexploringpatientssatisfaction3yearsaftertotalkneearthroplasty
AT sunwei howmuchimprovementcansatisfypatientsexploringpatientssatisfaction3yearsaftertotalkneearthroplasty