Cargando…

The Clinical Decision Support System AMPEL for Laboratory Diagnostics: Implementation and Technical Evaluation

BACKGROUND: Laboratory results are of central importance for clinical decision making. The time span between availability and review of results by clinicians is crucial to patient care. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are computational tools that can identify critical values automatically a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walter Costa, Maria Beatriz, Wernsdorfer, Mark, Kehrer, Alexander, Voigt, Markus, Cundius, Carina, Federbusch, Martin, Eckelt, Felix, Remmler, Johannes, Schmidt, Maria, Pehnke, Sarah, Gärtner, Christiane, Wehner, Markus, Isermann, Berend, Richter, Heike, Telle, Jörg, Kaiser, Thorsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8212627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34081013
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/20407
_version_ 1783709672891482112
author Walter Costa, Maria Beatriz
Wernsdorfer, Mark
Kehrer, Alexander
Voigt, Markus
Cundius, Carina
Federbusch, Martin
Eckelt, Felix
Remmler, Johannes
Schmidt, Maria
Pehnke, Sarah
Gärtner, Christiane
Wehner, Markus
Isermann, Berend
Richter, Heike
Telle, Jörg
Kaiser, Thorsten
author_facet Walter Costa, Maria Beatriz
Wernsdorfer, Mark
Kehrer, Alexander
Voigt, Markus
Cundius, Carina
Federbusch, Martin
Eckelt, Felix
Remmler, Johannes
Schmidt, Maria
Pehnke, Sarah
Gärtner, Christiane
Wehner, Markus
Isermann, Berend
Richter, Heike
Telle, Jörg
Kaiser, Thorsten
author_sort Walter Costa, Maria Beatriz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laboratory results are of central importance for clinical decision making. The time span between availability and review of results by clinicians is crucial to patient care. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are computational tools that can identify critical values automatically and help decrease treatment delay. OBJECTIVE: With this work, we aimed to implement and evaluate a CDSS that supports health care professionals and improves patient safety. In addition to our experiences, we also describe its main components in a general manner to make it applicable to a wide range of medical institutions and to empower colleagues to implement a similar system in their facilities. METHODS: Technical requirements must be taken into account before implementing a CDSS that performs laboratory diagnostics (labCDSS). These can be planned within the functional components of a reactive software agent, a computational framework for such a CDSS. RESULTS: We present AMPEL (Analysis and Reporting System for the Improvement of Patient Safety through Real-Time Integration of Laboratory Findings), a labCDSS that notifies health care professionals if a life-threatening medical condition is detected. We developed and implemented AMPEL at a university hospital and regional hospitals in Germany (University of Leipzig Medical Center and the Muldental Clinics in Grimma and Wurzen). It currently runs 5 different algorithms in parallel: hypokalemia, hypercalcemia, hyponatremia, hyperlactatemia, and acute kidney injury. CONCLUSIONS: AMPEL enables continuous surveillance of patients. The system is constantly being evaluated and extended and has the capacity for many more algorithms. We hope to encourage colleagues from other institutions to design and implement similar CDSS using the theory, specifications, and experiences described in this work.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8212627
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82126272021-07-09 The Clinical Decision Support System AMPEL for Laboratory Diagnostics: Implementation and Technical Evaluation Walter Costa, Maria Beatriz Wernsdorfer, Mark Kehrer, Alexander Voigt, Markus Cundius, Carina Federbusch, Martin Eckelt, Felix Remmler, Johannes Schmidt, Maria Pehnke, Sarah Gärtner, Christiane Wehner, Markus Isermann, Berend Richter, Heike Telle, Jörg Kaiser, Thorsten JMIR Med Inform Original Paper BACKGROUND: Laboratory results are of central importance for clinical decision making. The time span between availability and review of results by clinicians is crucial to patient care. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are computational tools that can identify critical values automatically and help decrease treatment delay. OBJECTIVE: With this work, we aimed to implement and evaluate a CDSS that supports health care professionals and improves patient safety. In addition to our experiences, we also describe its main components in a general manner to make it applicable to a wide range of medical institutions and to empower colleagues to implement a similar system in their facilities. METHODS: Technical requirements must be taken into account before implementing a CDSS that performs laboratory diagnostics (labCDSS). These can be planned within the functional components of a reactive software agent, a computational framework for such a CDSS. RESULTS: We present AMPEL (Analysis and Reporting System for the Improvement of Patient Safety through Real-Time Integration of Laboratory Findings), a labCDSS that notifies health care professionals if a life-threatening medical condition is detected. We developed and implemented AMPEL at a university hospital and regional hospitals in Germany (University of Leipzig Medical Center and the Muldental Clinics in Grimma and Wurzen). It currently runs 5 different algorithms in parallel: hypokalemia, hypercalcemia, hyponatremia, hyperlactatemia, and acute kidney injury. CONCLUSIONS: AMPEL enables continuous surveillance of patients. The system is constantly being evaluated and extended and has the capacity for many more algorithms. We hope to encourage colleagues from other institutions to design and implement similar CDSS using the theory, specifications, and experiences described in this work. JMIR Publications 2021-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8212627/ /pubmed/34081013 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/20407 Text en ©Maria Beatriz Walter Costa, Mark Wernsdorfer, Alexander Kehrer, Markus Voigt, Carina Cundius, Martin Federbusch, Felix Eckelt, Johannes Remmler, Maria Schmidt, Sarah Pehnke, Christiane Gärtner, Markus Wehner, Berend Isermann, Heike Richter, Jörg Telle, Thorsten Kaiser. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (https://medinform.jmir.org), 03.06.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Medical Informatics, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://medinform.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Walter Costa, Maria Beatriz
Wernsdorfer, Mark
Kehrer, Alexander
Voigt, Markus
Cundius, Carina
Federbusch, Martin
Eckelt, Felix
Remmler, Johannes
Schmidt, Maria
Pehnke, Sarah
Gärtner, Christiane
Wehner, Markus
Isermann, Berend
Richter, Heike
Telle, Jörg
Kaiser, Thorsten
The Clinical Decision Support System AMPEL for Laboratory Diagnostics: Implementation and Technical Evaluation
title The Clinical Decision Support System AMPEL for Laboratory Diagnostics: Implementation and Technical Evaluation
title_full The Clinical Decision Support System AMPEL for Laboratory Diagnostics: Implementation and Technical Evaluation
title_fullStr The Clinical Decision Support System AMPEL for Laboratory Diagnostics: Implementation and Technical Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed The Clinical Decision Support System AMPEL for Laboratory Diagnostics: Implementation and Technical Evaluation
title_short The Clinical Decision Support System AMPEL for Laboratory Diagnostics: Implementation and Technical Evaluation
title_sort clinical decision support system ampel for laboratory diagnostics: implementation and technical evaluation
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8212627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34081013
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/20407
work_keys_str_mv AT waltercostamariabeatriz theclinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation
AT wernsdorfermark theclinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation
AT kehreralexander theclinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation
AT voigtmarkus theclinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation
AT cundiuscarina theclinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation
AT federbuschmartin theclinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation
AT eckeltfelix theclinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation
AT remmlerjohannes theclinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation
AT schmidtmaria theclinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation
AT pehnkesarah theclinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation
AT gartnerchristiane theclinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation
AT wehnermarkus theclinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation
AT isermannberend theclinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation
AT richterheike theclinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation
AT tellejorg theclinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation
AT kaiserthorsten theclinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation
AT waltercostamariabeatriz clinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation
AT wernsdorfermark clinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation
AT kehreralexander clinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation
AT voigtmarkus clinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation
AT cundiuscarina clinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation
AT federbuschmartin clinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation
AT eckeltfelix clinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation
AT remmlerjohannes clinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation
AT schmidtmaria clinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation
AT pehnkesarah clinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation
AT gartnerchristiane clinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation
AT wehnermarkus clinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation
AT isermannberend clinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation
AT richterheike clinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation
AT tellejorg clinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation
AT kaiserthorsten clinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation