Cargando…
The Clinical Decision Support System AMPEL for Laboratory Diagnostics: Implementation and Technical Evaluation
BACKGROUND: Laboratory results are of central importance for clinical decision making. The time span between availability and review of results by clinicians is crucial to patient care. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are computational tools that can identify critical values automatically a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8212627/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34081013 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/20407 |
_version_ | 1783709672891482112 |
---|---|
author | Walter Costa, Maria Beatriz Wernsdorfer, Mark Kehrer, Alexander Voigt, Markus Cundius, Carina Federbusch, Martin Eckelt, Felix Remmler, Johannes Schmidt, Maria Pehnke, Sarah Gärtner, Christiane Wehner, Markus Isermann, Berend Richter, Heike Telle, Jörg Kaiser, Thorsten |
author_facet | Walter Costa, Maria Beatriz Wernsdorfer, Mark Kehrer, Alexander Voigt, Markus Cundius, Carina Federbusch, Martin Eckelt, Felix Remmler, Johannes Schmidt, Maria Pehnke, Sarah Gärtner, Christiane Wehner, Markus Isermann, Berend Richter, Heike Telle, Jörg Kaiser, Thorsten |
author_sort | Walter Costa, Maria Beatriz |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Laboratory results are of central importance for clinical decision making. The time span between availability and review of results by clinicians is crucial to patient care. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are computational tools that can identify critical values automatically and help decrease treatment delay. OBJECTIVE: With this work, we aimed to implement and evaluate a CDSS that supports health care professionals and improves patient safety. In addition to our experiences, we also describe its main components in a general manner to make it applicable to a wide range of medical institutions and to empower colleagues to implement a similar system in their facilities. METHODS: Technical requirements must be taken into account before implementing a CDSS that performs laboratory diagnostics (labCDSS). These can be planned within the functional components of a reactive software agent, a computational framework for such a CDSS. RESULTS: We present AMPEL (Analysis and Reporting System for the Improvement of Patient Safety through Real-Time Integration of Laboratory Findings), a labCDSS that notifies health care professionals if a life-threatening medical condition is detected. We developed and implemented AMPEL at a university hospital and regional hospitals in Germany (University of Leipzig Medical Center and the Muldental Clinics in Grimma and Wurzen). It currently runs 5 different algorithms in parallel: hypokalemia, hypercalcemia, hyponatremia, hyperlactatemia, and acute kidney injury. CONCLUSIONS: AMPEL enables continuous surveillance of patients. The system is constantly being evaluated and extended and has the capacity for many more algorithms. We hope to encourage colleagues from other institutions to design and implement similar CDSS using the theory, specifications, and experiences described in this work. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8212627 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82126272021-07-09 The Clinical Decision Support System AMPEL for Laboratory Diagnostics: Implementation and Technical Evaluation Walter Costa, Maria Beatriz Wernsdorfer, Mark Kehrer, Alexander Voigt, Markus Cundius, Carina Federbusch, Martin Eckelt, Felix Remmler, Johannes Schmidt, Maria Pehnke, Sarah Gärtner, Christiane Wehner, Markus Isermann, Berend Richter, Heike Telle, Jörg Kaiser, Thorsten JMIR Med Inform Original Paper BACKGROUND: Laboratory results are of central importance for clinical decision making. The time span between availability and review of results by clinicians is crucial to patient care. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are computational tools that can identify critical values automatically and help decrease treatment delay. OBJECTIVE: With this work, we aimed to implement and evaluate a CDSS that supports health care professionals and improves patient safety. In addition to our experiences, we also describe its main components in a general manner to make it applicable to a wide range of medical institutions and to empower colleagues to implement a similar system in their facilities. METHODS: Technical requirements must be taken into account before implementing a CDSS that performs laboratory diagnostics (labCDSS). These can be planned within the functional components of a reactive software agent, a computational framework for such a CDSS. RESULTS: We present AMPEL (Analysis and Reporting System for the Improvement of Patient Safety through Real-Time Integration of Laboratory Findings), a labCDSS that notifies health care professionals if a life-threatening medical condition is detected. We developed and implemented AMPEL at a university hospital and regional hospitals in Germany (University of Leipzig Medical Center and the Muldental Clinics in Grimma and Wurzen). It currently runs 5 different algorithms in parallel: hypokalemia, hypercalcemia, hyponatremia, hyperlactatemia, and acute kidney injury. CONCLUSIONS: AMPEL enables continuous surveillance of patients. The system is constantly being evaluated and extended and has the capacity for many more algorithms. We hope to encourage colleagues from other institutions to design and implement similar CDSS using the theory, specifications, and experiences described in this work. JMIR Publications 2021-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8212627/ /pubmed/34081013 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/20407 Text en ©Maria Beatriz Walter Costa, Mark Wernsdorfer, Alexander Kehrer, Markus Voigt, Carina Cundius, Martin Federbusch, Felix Eckelt, Johannes Remmler, Maria Schmidt, Sarah Pehnke, Christiane Gärtner, Markus Wehner, Berend Isermann, Heike Richter, Jörg Telle, Thorsten Kaiser. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (https://medinform.jmir.org), 03.06.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Medical Informatics, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://medinform.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Walter Costa, Maria Beatriz Wernsdorfer, Mark Kehrer, Alexander Voigt, Markus Cundius, Carina Federbusch, Martin Eckelt, Felix Remmler, Johannes Schmidt, Maria Pehnke, Sarah Gärtner, Christiane Wehner, Markus Isermann, Berend Richter, Heike Telle, Jörg Kaiser, Thorsten The Clinical Decision Support System AMPEL for Laboratory Diagnostics: Implementation and Technical Evaluation |
title | The Clinical Decision Support System AMPEL for Laboratory Diagnostics: Implementation and Technical Evaluation |
title_full | The Clinical Decision Support System AMPEL for Laboratory Diagnostics: Implementation and Technical Evaluation |
title_fullStr | The Clinical Decision Support System AMPEL for Laboratory Diagnostics: Implementation and Technical Evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | The Clinical Decision Support System AMPEL for Laboratory Diagnostics: Implementation and Technical Evaluation |
title_short | The Clinical Decision Support System AMPEL for Laboratory Diagnostics: Implementation and Technical Evaluation |
title_sort | clinical decision support system ampel for laboratory diagnostics: implementation and technical evaluation |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8212627/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34081013 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/20407 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT waltercostamariabeatriz theclinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation AT wernsdorfermark theclinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation AT kehreralexander theclinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation AT voigtmarkus theclinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation AT cundiuscarina theclinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation AT federbuschmartin theclinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation AT eckeltfelix theclinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation AT remmlerjohannes theclinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation AT schmidtmaria theclinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation AT pehnkesarah theclinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation AT gartnerchristiane theclinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation AT wehnermarkus theclinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation AT isermannberend theclinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation AT richterheike theclinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation AT tellejorg theclinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation AT kaiserthorsten theclinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation AT waltercostamariabeatriz clinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation AT wernsdorfermark clinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation AT kehreralexander clinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation AT voigtmarkus clinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation AT cundiuscarina clinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation AT federbuschmartin clinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation AT eckeltfelix clinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation AT remmlerjohannes clinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation AT schmidtmaria clinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation AT pehnkesarah clinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation AT gartnerchristiane clinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation AT wehnermarkus clinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation AT isermannberend clinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation AT richterheike clinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation AT tellejorg clinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation AT kaiserthorsten clinicaldecisionsupportsystemampelforlaboratorydiagnosticsimplementationandtechnicalevaluation |