Cargando…

Robotic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Platform (RASP): a next-generation approach to One Health surveillance of antimicrobial resistance

BACKGROUND: Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is critical to reducing its wide-reaching impact. Its reliance on sample size invites solutions to longstanding constraints regarding scalability. A robotic platform (RASP) was developed for high-throughput AMR surveillance in accordance wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Truswell, Alec, Abraham, Rebecca, O’Dea, Mark, Lee, Zheng Zhou, Lee, Terence, Laird, Tanya, Blinco, John, Kaplan, Shai, Turnidge, John, Trott, Darren J, Jordan, David, Abraham, Sam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8212771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33893498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkab107
_version_ 1783709703213154304
author Truswell, Alec
Abraham, Rebecca
O’Dea, Mark
Lee, Zheng Zhou
Lee, Terence
Laird, Tanya
Blinco, John
Kaplan, Shai
Turnidge, John
Trott, Darren J
Jordan, David
Abraham, Sam
author_facet Truswell, Alec
Abraham, Rebecca
O’Dea, Mark
Lee, Zheng Zhou
Lee, Terence
Laird, Tanya
Blinco, John
Kaplan, Shai
Turnidge, John
Trott, Darren J
Jordan, David
Abraham, Sam
author_sort Truswell, Alec
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is critical to reducing its wide-reaching impact. Its reliance on sample size invites solutions to longstanding constraints regarding scalability. A robotic platform (RASP) was developed for high-throughput AMR surveillance in accordance with internationally recognized standards (CLSI and ISO 20776-1:2019) and validated through a series of experiments. METHODS: Experiment A compared RASP’s ability to achieve consistent MICs with that of a human technician across eight replicates for four Escherichia coli isolates. Experiment B assessed RASP’s agreement with human-performed MICs across 91 E. coli isolates with a diverse range of AMR profiles. Additionally, to demonstrate its real-world applicability, the RASP workflow was then applied to five faecal samples where a minimum of 47 E. coli per animal (239 total) were evaluated using an AMR indexing framework. RESULTS: For each drug–rater–isolate combination in Experiment A, there was a clear consensus of the MIC and deviation from the consensus remained within one doubling dilution (the exception being gentamicin at two dilutions). Experiment B revealed a concordance correlation coefficient of 0.9670 (95% CI: 0.9670–0.9670) between the robot- and human-performed MICs. RASP’s application to the five faecal samples highlighted the intra-animal diversity of gut commensal E. coli, identifying between five and nine unique isolate AMR phenotypes per sample. CONCLUSIONS: While adhering to internationally accepted guidelines, RASP was superior in throughput, cost and data resolution when compared with an experienced human technician. Integration of robotics platforms in the microbiology laboratory is a necessary advancement for future One Health AMR endeavours.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8212771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82127712021-06-21 Robotic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Platform (RASP): a next-generation approach to One Health surveillance of antimicrobial resistance Truswell, Alec Abraham, Rebecca O’Dea, Mark Lee, Zheng Zhou Lee, Terence Laird, Tanya Blinco, John Kaplan, Shai Turnidge, John Trott, Darren J Jordan, David Abraham, Sam J Antimicrob Chemother Original Research BACKGROUND: Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is critical to reducing its wide-reaching impact. Its reliance on sample size invites solutions to longstanding constraints regarding scalability. A robotic platform (RASP) was developed for high-throughput AMR surveillance in accordance with internationally recognized standards (CLSI and ISO 20776-1:2019) and validated through a series of experiments. METHODS: Experiment A compared RASP’s ability to achieve consistent MICs with that of a human technician across eight replicates for four Escherichia coli isolates. Experiment B assessed RASP’s agreement with human-performed MICs across 91 E. coli isolates with a diverse range of AMR profiles. Additionally, to demonstrate its real-world applicability, the RASP workflow was then applied to five faecal samples where a minimum of 47 E. coli per animal (239 total) were evaluated using an AMR indexing framework. RESULTS: For each drug–rater–isolate combination in Experiment A, there was a clear consensus of the MIC and deviation from the consensus remained within one doubling dilution (the exception being gentamicin at two dilutions). Experiment B revealed a concordance correlation coefficient of 0.9670 (95% CI: 0.9670–0.9670) between the robot- and human-performed MICs. RASP’s application to the five faecal samples highlighted the intra-animal diversity of gut commensal E. coli, identifying between five and nine unique isolate AMR phenotypes per sample. CONCLUSIONS: While adhering to internationally accepted guidelines, RASP was superior in throughput, cost and data resolution when compared with an experienced human technician. Integration of robotics platforms in the microbiology laboratory is a necessary advancement for future One Health AMR endeavours. Oxford University Press 2021-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8212771/ /pubmed/33893498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkab107 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Research
Truswell, Alec
Abraham, Rebecca
O’Dea, Mark
Lee, Zheng Zhou
Lee, Terence
Laird, Tanya
Blinco, John
Kaplan, Shai
Turnidge, John
Trott, Darren J
Jordan, David
Abraham, Sam
Robotic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Platform (RASP): a next-generation approach to One Health surveillance of antimicrobial resistance
title Robotic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Platform (RASP): a next-generation approach to One Health surveillance of antimicrobial resistance
title_full Robotic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Platform (RASP): a next-generation approach to One Health surveillance of antimicrobial resistance
title_fullStr Robotic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Platform (RASP): a next-generation approach to One Health surveillance of antimicrobial resistance
title_full_unstemmed Robotic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Platform (RASP): a next-generation approach to One Health surveillance of antimicrobial resistance
title_short Robotic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Platform (RASP): a next-generation approach to One Health surveillance of antimicrobial resistance
title_sort robotic antimicrobial susceptibility platform (rasp): a next-generation approach to one health surveillance of antimicrobial resistance
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8212771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33893498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkab107
work_keys_str_mv AT truswellalec roboticantimicrobialsusceptibilityplatformraspanextgenerationapproachtoonehealthsurveillanceofantimicrobialresistance
AT abrahamrebecca roboticantimicrobialsusceptibilityplatformraspanextgenerationapproachtoonehealthsurveillanceofantimicrobialresistance
AT odeamark roboticantimicrobialsusceptibilityplatformraspanextgenerationapproachtoonehealthsurveillanceofantimicrobialresistance
AT leezhengzhou roboticantimicrobialsusceptibilityplatformraspanextgenerationapproachtoonehealthsurveillanceofantimicrobialresistance
AT leeterence roboticantimicrobialsusceptibilityplatformraspanextgenerationapproachtoonehealthsurveillanceofantimicrobialresistance
AT lairdtanya roboticantimicrobialsusceptibilityplatformraspanextgenerationapproachtoonehealthsurveillanceofantimicrobialresistance
AT blincojohn roboticantimicrobialsusceptibilityplatformraspanextgenerationapproachtoonehealthsurveillanceofantimicrobialresistance
AT kaplanshai roboticantimicrobialsusceptibilityplatformraspanextgenerationapproachtoonehealthsurveillanceofantimicrobialresistance
AT turnidgejohn roboticantimicrobialsusceptibilityplatformraspanextgenerationapproachtoonehealthsurveillanceofantimicrobialresistance
AT trottdarrenj roboticantimicrobialsusceptibilityplatformraspanextgenerationapproachtoonehealthsurveillanceofantimicrobialresistance
AT jordandavid roboticantimicrobialsusceptibilityplatformraspanextgenerationapproachtoonehealthsurveillanceofantimicrobialresistance
AT abrahamsam roboticantimicrobialsusceptibilityplatformraspanextgenerationapproachtoonehealthsurveillanceofantimicrobialresistance