Cargando…
Effect of Denosumab or Alendronic Acid on the Progression of Aortic Stenosis: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
Valvular calcification is central to the pathogenesis and progression of aortic stenosis, with preclinical and observational studies suggesting that bone turnover and osteoblastic differentiation of valvular interstitial cells are important contributory mechanisms. We aimed to establish whether inhi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8212878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33913339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.053708 |
_version_ | 1783709722031947776 |
---|---|
author | Pawade, Tania A. Doris, Mhairi K. Bing, Rong White, Audrey C. Forsyth, Laura Evans, Emily Graham, Catriona Williams, Michelle C. van Beek, Edwin J.R. Fletcher, Alison Adamson, Philip D. Andrews, Jack P.M. Cartlidge, Timothy R.G. Jenkins, William S.A. Syed, Maaz Fujisawa, Takeshi Lucatelli, Christophe Fraser, William Ralston, Stuart H. Boon, Nicholas Prendergast, Bernard Newby, David E. Dweck, Marc R. |
author_facet | Pawade, Tania A. Doris, Mhairi K. Bing, Rong White, Audrey C. Forsyth, Laura Evans, Emily Graham, Catriona Williams, Michelle C. van Beek, Edwin J.R. Fletcher, Alison Adamson, Philip D. Andrews, Jack P.M. Cartlidge, Timothy R.G. Jenkins, William S.A. Syed, Maaz Fujisawa, Takeshi Lucatelli, Christophe Fraser, William Ralston, Stuart H. Boon, Nicholas Prendergast, Bernard Newby, David E. Dweck, Marc R. |
author_sort | Pawade, Tania A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Valvular calcification is central to the pathogenesis and progression of aortic stenosis, with preclinical and observational studies suggesting that bone turnover and osteoblastic differentiation of valvular interstitial cells are important contributory mechanisms. We aimed to establish whether inhibition of these pathways with denosumab or alendronic acid could reduce disease progression in aortic stenosis. METHODS: In a single-center, parallel group, double-blind randomized controlled trial, patients >50 years of age with calcific aortic stenosis (peak aortic jet velocity >2.5 m/s) were randomized 2:1:2:1 to denosumab (60 mg every 6 months), placebo injection, alendronic acid (70 mg once weekly), or placebo capsule. Participants underwent serial assessments with Doppler echocardiography, computed tomography aortic valve calcium scoring, and (18)F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography and computed tomography. The primary end point was the calculated 24-month change in aortic valve calcium score. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients (mean age, 72±8 years; 21% women) with calcific aortic stenosis (peak aortic jet velocity, 3.36 m/s [2.93–3.82 m/s]; aortic valve calcium score, 1152 AU [655–2065 AU]) were randomized and received the allocated trial intervention: denosumab (n=49), alendronic acid (n=51), and placebo (injection n=25, capsule n=25; pooled for analysis). Serum C-terminal telopeptide, a measure of bone turnover, halved from baseline to 6 months with denosumab (0.23 [0.18–0.33 µg/L] to 0.11 µg/L [0.08–0.17 µg/L]) and alendronic acid (0.20 [0.14–0.28 µg/L] to 0.09 µg/L [0.08–0.13 µg/L]) but was unchanged with placebo (0.23 [0.17–0.30 µg/L] to 0.26 µg/L [0.16–0.31 µg/L]). There were no differences in 24-month change in aortic valve calcium score between denosumab and placebo (343 [198–804 AU] versus 354 AU [76–675 AU]; P=0.41) or alendronic acid and placebo (326 [138–813 AU] versus 354 AU [76–675 AU]; P=0.49). Similarly, there were no differences in change in peak aortic jet velocity or (18)F-sodium fluoride aortic valve uptake. CONCLUSIONS: Neither denosumab nor alendronic acid affected progression of aortic valve calcification in patients with calcific aortic stenosis. Alternative pathways and mechanisms need to be explored to identify disease-modifying therapies for the growing population of patients with this potentially fatal condition. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02132026. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8212878 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82128782021-06-21 Effect of Denosumab or Alendronic Acid on the Progression of Aortic Stenosis: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Pawade, Tania A. Doris, Mhairi K. Bing, Rong White, Audrey C. Forsyth, Laura Evans, Emily Graham, Catriona Williams, Michelle C. van Beek, Edwin J.R. Fletcher, Alison Adamson, Philip D. Andrews, Jack P.M. Cartlidge, Timothy R.G. Jenkins, William S.A. Syed, Maaz Fujisawa, Takeshi Lucatelli, Christophe Fraser, William Ralston, Stuart H. Boon, Nicholas Prendergast, Bernard Newby, David E. Dweck, Marc R. Circulation Original Research Articles Valvular calcification is central to the pathogenesis and progression of aortic stenosis, with preclinical and observational studies suggesting that bone turnover and osteoblastic differentiation of valvular interstitial cells are important contributory mechanisms. We aimed to establish whether inhibition of these pathways with denosumab or alendronic acid could reduce disease progression in aortic stenosis. METHODS: In a single-center, parallel group, double-blind randomized controlled trial, patients >50 years of age with calcific aortic stenosis (peak aortic jet velocity >2.5 m/s) were randomized 2:1:2:1 to denosumab (60 mg every 6 months), placebo injection, alendronic acid (70 mg once weekly), or placebo capsule. Participants underwent serial assessments with Doppler echocardiography, computed tomography aortic valve calcium scoring, and (18)F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography and computed tomography. The primary end point was the calculated 24-month change in aortic valve calcium score. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients (mean age, 72±8 years; 21% women) with calcific aortic stenosis (peak aortic jet velocity, 3.36 m/s [2.93–3.82 m/s]; aortic valve calcium score, 1152 AU [655–2065 AU]) were randomized and received the allocated trial intervention: denosumab (n=49), alendronic acid (n=51), and placebo (injection n=25, capsule n=25; pooled for analysis). Serum C-terminal telopeptide, a measure of bone turnover, halved from baseline to 6 months with denosumab (0.23 [0.18–0.33 µg/L] to 0.11 µg/L [0.08–0.17 µg/L]) and alendronic acid (0.20 [0.14–0.28 µg/L] to 0.09 µg/L [0.08–0.13 µg/L]) but was unchanged with placebo (0.23 [0.17–0.30 µg/L] to 0.26 µg/L [0.16–0.31 µg/L]). There were no differences in 24-month change in aortic valve calcium score between denosumab and placebo (343 [198–804 AU] versus 354 AU [76–675 AU]; P=0.41) or alendronic acid and placebo (326 [138–813 AU] versus 354 AU [76–675 AU]; P=0.49). Similarly, there were no differences in change in peak aortic jet velocity or (18)F-sodium fluoride aortic valve uptake. CONCLUSIONS: Neither denosumab nor alendronic acid affected progression of aortic valve calcification in patients with calcific aortic stenosis. Alternative pathways and mechanisms need to be explored to identify disease-modifying therapies for the growing population of patients with this potentially fatal condition. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02132026. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-04-29 2021-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8212878/ /pubmed/33913339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.053708 Text en © 2021 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Circulation is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic or until permissions are revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a perpetual license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, consistent with existing copyright protections. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Articles Pawade, Tania A. Doris, Mhairi K. Bing, Rong White, Audrey C. Forsyth, Laura Evans, Emily Graham, Catriona Williams, Michelle C. van Beek, Edwin J.R. Fletcher, Alison Adamson, Philip D. Andrews, Jack P.M. Cartlidge, Timothy R.G. Jenkins, William S.A. Syed, Maaz Fujisawa, Takeshi Lucatelli, Christophe Fraser, William Ralston, Stuart H. Boon, Nicholas Prendergast, Bernard Newby, David E. Dweck, Marc R. Effect of Denosumab or Alendronic Acid on the Progression of Aortic Stenosis: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Effect of Denosumab or Alendronic Acid on the Progression of Aortic Stenosis: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Effect of Denosumab or Alendronic Acid on the Progression of Aortic Stenosis: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Effect of Denosumab or Alendronic Acid on the Progression of Aortic Stenosis: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of Denosumab or Alendronic Acid on the Progression of Aortic Stenosis: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Effect of Denosumab or Alendronic Acid on the Progression of Aortic Stenosis: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | effect of denosumab or alendronic acid on the progression of aortic stenosis: a double-blind randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8212878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33913339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.053708 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pawadetaniaa effectofdenosumaboralendronicacidontheprogressionofaorticstenosisadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dorismhairik effectofdenosumaboralendronicacidontheprogressionofaorticstenosisadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bingrong effectofdenosumaboralendronicacidontheprogressionofaorticstenosisadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT whiteaudreyc effectofdenosumaboralendronicacidontheprogressionofaorticstenosisadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT forsythlaura effectofdenosumaboralendronicacidontheprogressionofaorticstenosisadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT evansemily effectofdenosumaboralendronicacidontheprogressionofaorticstenosisadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT grahamcatriona effectofdenosumaboralendronicacidontheprogressionofaorticstenosisadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT williamsmichellec effectofdenosumaboralendronicacidontheprogressionofaorticstenosisadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanbeekedwinjr effectofdenosumaboralendronicacidontheprogressionofaorticstenosisadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fletcheralison effectofdenosumaboralendronicacidontheprogressionofaorticstenosisadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT adamsonphilipd effectofdenosumaboralendronicacidontheprogressionofaorticstenosisadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT andrewsjackpm effectofdenosumaboralendronicacidontheprogressionofaorticstenosisadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT cartlidgetimothyrg effectofdenosumaboralendronicacidontheprogressionofaorticstenosisadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jenkinswilliamsa effectofdenosumaboralendronicacidontheprogressionofaorticstenosisadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT syedmaaz effectofdenosumaboralendronicacidontheprogressionofaorticstenosisadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fujisawatakeshi effectofdenosumaboralendronicacidontheprogressionofaorticstenosisadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lucatellichristophe effectofdenosumaboralendronicacidontheprogressionofaorticstenosisadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fraserwilliam effectofdenosumaboralendronicacidontheprogressionofaorticstenosisadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ralstonstuarth effectofdenosumaboralendronicacidontheprogressionofaorticstenosisadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT boonnicholas effectofdenosumaboralendronicacidontheprogressionofaorticstenosisadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT prendergastbernard effectofdenosumaboralendronicacidontheprogressionofaorticstenosisadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT newbydavide effectofdenosumaboralendronicacidontheprogressionofaorticstenosisadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dweckmarcr effectofdenosumaboralendronicacidontheprogressionofaorticstenosisadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial |