Cargando…

Efficacy of Omadacycline Versus Moxifloxacin in the Treatment of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia by Disease Severity: Results From the OPTIC Study

BACKGROUND: Severity/mortality risk scores and disease characteristics may assist in deciding whether patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) require outpatient treatment or hospitalization. The phase 3 OPTIC (Omadacycline for Pneumonia Treatment In the Community) study enrolled...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramirez, Julio, Deck, Daniel H, Eckburg, Paul B, Curran, Marla, Das, Anita F, Kirsch, Courtney, Manley, Amy, Tzanis, Evan, McGovern, Paul C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8212944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34160474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab135
_version_ 1783709736053506048
author Ramirez, Julio
Deck, Daniel H
Eckburg, Paul B
Curran, Marla
Das, Anita F
Kirsch, Courtney
Manley, Amy
Tzanis, Evan
McGovern, Paul C
author_facet Ramirez, Julio
Deck, Daniel H
Eckburg, Paul B
Curran, Marla
Das, Anita F
Kirsch, Courtney
Manley, Amy
Tzanis, Evan
McGovern, Paul C
author_sort Ramirez, Julio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Severity/mortality risk scores and disease characteristics may assist in deciding whether patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) require outpatient treatment or hospitalization. The phase 3 OPTIC (Omadacycline for Pneumonia Treatment In the Community) study enrolled patients with Pneumonia Outcomes Research Team (PORT) risk class II–IV. Omadacycline demonstrated noninferiority to moxifloxacin in adults with CABP, at early clinical response (ECR) and posttreatment evaluation (PTE). We assessed efficacy of omadacycline versus moxifloxacin in these patients based on disease severity. METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive intravenous (IV) omadacycline (100 mg every 12 hours for 2 doses followed by 100 mg daily [q24h], with optional transition to omadacycline 300 mg orally q24h after 3 days of IV treatment) or moxifloxacin IV 400 mg q24h (with optional transition to 400 mg orally q24h after 3 days of IV treatment). Total treatment duration was 7–14 days. We compared rates of early clinical success (72–120 hours after first dose) and investigator-assessed clinical success at PTE (5–10 days after last dose) in subgroups based (1) on severity/mortality risk scores (PORT, CURB-65, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, quick Sequential [Sepsis-related] Organ Failure Assessment, modified ATS, SMART-COP) and (2) on presence of baseline radiographic characteristics, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)/asthma, or bacteremia. RESULTS: Altogether, 774 patients (omadacycline, n = 386; moxifloxacin, n = 388) were randomized. Clinical success rates (ECR/PTE) were similar between treatment groups (across all subgroups). Efficacy across treatment groups was similar in patients with baseline radiographic characteristics or COPD/asthma, but moxifloxacin had higher clinical success rates in patients with bacteremia. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of omadacycline was similar to that of moxifloxacin, regardless of disease severity/mortality risk and disease characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8212944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82129442021-06-21 Efficacy of Omadacycline Versus Moxifloxacin in the Treatment of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia by Disease Severity: Results From the OPTIC Study Ramirez, Julio Deck, Daniel H Eckburg, Paul B Curran, Marla Das, Anita F Kirsch, Courtney Manley, Amy Tzanis, Evan McGovern, Paul C Open Forum Infect Dis Major Articles BACKGROUND: Severity/mortality risk scores and disease characteristics may assist in deciding whether patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) require outpatient treatment or hospitalization. The phase 3 OPTIC (Omadacycline for Pneumonia Treatment In the Community) study enrolled patients with Pneumonia Outcomes Research Team (PORT) risk class II–IV. Omadacycline demonstrated noninferiority to moxifloxacin in adults with CABP, at early clinical response (ECR) and posttreatment evaluation (PTE). We assessed efficacy of omadacycline versus moxifloxacin in these patients based on disease severity. METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive intravenous (IV) omadacycline (100 mg every 12 hours for 2 doses followed by 100 mg daily [q24h], with optional transition to omadacycline 300 mg orally q24h after 3 days of IV treatment) or moxifloxacin IV 400 mg q24h (with optional transition to 400 mg orally q24h after 3 days of IV treatment). Total treatment duration was 7–14 days. We compared rates of early clinical success (72–120 hours after first dose) and investigator-assessed clinical success at PTE (5–10 days after last dose) in subgroups based (1) on severity/mortality risk scores (PORT, CURB-65, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, quick Sequential [Sepsis-related] Organ Failure Assessment, modified ATS, SMART-COP) and (2) on presence of baseline radiographic characteristics, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)/asthma, or bacteremia. RESULTS: Altogether, 774 patients (omadacycline, n = 386; moxifloxacin, n = 388) were randomized. Clinical success rates (ECR/PTE) were similar between treatment groups (across all subgroups). Efficacy across treatment groups was similar in patients with baseline radiographic characteristics or COPD/asthma, but moxifloxacin had higher clinical success rates in patients with bacteremia. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of omadacycline was similar to that of moxifloxacin, regardless of disease severity/mortality risk and disease characteristics. Oxford University Press 2021-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8212944/ /pubmed/34160474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab135 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Major Articles
Ramirez, Julio
Deck, Daniel H
Eckburg, Paul B
Curran, Marla
Das, Anita F
Kirsch, Courtney
Manley, Amy
Tzanis, Evan
McGovern, Paul C
Efficacy of Omadacycline Versus Moxifloxacin in the Treatment of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia by Disease Severity: Results From the OPTIC Study
title Efficacy of Omadacycline Versus Moxifloxacin in the Treatment of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia by Disease Severity: Results From the OPTIC Study
title_full Efficacy of Omadacycline Versus Moxifloxacin in the Treatment of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia by Disease Severity: Results From the OPTIC Study
title_fullStr Efficacy of Omadacycline Versus Moxifloxacin in the Treatment of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia by Disease Severity: Results From the OPTIC Study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Omadacycline Versus Moxifloxacin in the Treatment of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia by Disease Severity: Results From the OPTIC Study
title_short Efficacy of Omadacycline Versus Moxifloxacin in the Treatment of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia by Disease Severity: Results From the OPTIC Study
title_sort efficacy of omadacycline versus moxifloxacin in the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia by disease severity: results from the optic study
topic Major Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8212944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34160474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab135
work_keys_str_mv AT ramirezjulio efficacyofomadacyclineversusmoxifloxacininthetreatmentofcommunityacquiredbacterialpneumoniabydiseaseseverityresultsfromtheopticstudy
AT deckdanielh efficacyofomadacyclineversusmoxifloxacininthetreatmentofcommunityacquiredbacterialpneumoniabydiseaseseverityresultsfromtheopticstudy
AT eckburgpaulb efficacyofomadacyclineversusmoxifloxacininthetreatmentofcommunityacquiredbacterialpneumoniabydiseaseseverityresultsfromtheopticstudy
AT curranmarla efficacyofomadacyclineversusmoxifloxacininthetreatmentofcommunityacquiredbacterialpneumoniabydiseaseseverityresultsfromtheopticstudy
AT dasanitaf efficacyofomadacyclineversusmoxifloxacininthetreatmentofcommunityacquiredbacterialpneumoniabydiseaseseverityresultsfromtheopticstudy
AT kirschcourtney efficacyofomadacyclineversusmoxifloxacininthetreatmentofcommunityacquiredbacterialpneumoniabydiseaseseverityresultsfromtheopticstudy
AT manleyamy efficacyofomadacyclineversusmoxifloxacininthetreatmentofcommunityacquiredbacterialpneumoniabydiseaseseverityresultsfromtheopticstudy
AT tzanisevan efficacyofomadacyclineversusmoxifloxacininthetreatmentofcommunityacquiredbacterialpneumoniabydiseaseseverityresultsfromtheopticstudy
AT mcgovernpaulc efficacyofomadacyclineversusmoxifloxacininthetreatmentofcommunityacquiredbacterialpneumoniabydiseaseseverityresultsfromtheopticstudy