Cargando…

Application of Discrete Choice Experiment in Health Care: A Bibliometric Analysis

Background: Discrete choice experiment (DCE) as a tool that can measure medical stakeholders' preferences especially patients recently has been increasingly applied in health care. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the hotspots and trends of the application of DCE in health care a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yue, Wang, Zhangyi, Wang, Zhao, Li, Xuechun, Pang, Xiaoli, Wang, Shuling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8212992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34150710
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.673698
_version_ 1783709746854887424
author Wang, Yue
Wang, Zhangyi
Wang, Zhao
Li, Xuechun
Pang, Xiaoli
Wang, Shuling
author_facet Wang, Yue
Wang, Zhangyi
Wang, Zhao
Li, Xuechun
Pang, Xiaoli
Wang, Shuling
author_sort Wang, Yue
collection PubMed
description Background: Discrete choice experiment (DCE) as a tool that can measure medical stakeholders' preferences especially patients recently has been increasingly applied in health care. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the hotspots and trends of the application of DCE in health care and to provide reference and direction for further development of DCE in the future. Method: A bibliometric method was implemented using the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection for the period from the database established to December 8, 2020. The data files are imported into CiteSpace and Excel to analyze and visualize the annual volume of productive, authors, countries, cited journals, cited articles, and keywords. Results: A total of 1,811 articles were retrieved, then we read the abstract of each paper one by one, and 1,562 articles were included after screening, with an exponential increase in publication volume. John F. P. Bridges contributed to 40 publications and ranked first, followed by F. Reed Johnson (n = 37), Julie Ratcliffe (n = 36). The majority of the papers were conducted in the United States (n = 513) and the United Kingdom (n = 433). The top three cited journals were “Health Economics” (n = 981), “Value in Health” (n = 893), and “Pharmaceutical Economics” (n = 774), and the top three articles were “Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force,” “Conjoint analysis applications in health-a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force,” and “Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.” The research hotspots and trends included “health technology assessment,” “survival,” “preference based measure,” and “health state valuation.” Conclusion: The size of the literature about DCE studies in health care showed a noticeable increase in the past decade. The application of DCE in health care remains in an early growth phase, and “health technology assessment,” “survival,” “preference based measure,” and “health state valuation” reflected the latest research hotpots and future trends.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8212992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82129922021-06-19 Application of Discrete Choice Experiment in Health Care: A Bibliometric Analysis Wang, Yue Wang, Zhangyi Wang, Zhao Li, Xuechun Pang, Xiaoli Wang, Shuling Front Public Health Public Health Background: Discrete choice experiment (DCE) as a tool that can measure medical stakeholders' preferences especially patients recently has been increasingly applied in health care. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the hotspots and trends of the application of DCE in health care and to provide reference and direction for further development of DCE in the future. Method: A bibliometric method was implemented using the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection for the period from the database established to December 8, 2020. The data files are imported into CiteSpace and Excel to analyze and visualize the annual volume of productive, authors, countries, cited journals, cited articles, and keywords. Results: A total of 1,811 articles were retrieved, then we read the abstract of each paper one by one, and 1,562 articles were included after screening, with an exponential increase in publication volume. John F. P. Bridges contributed to 40 publications and ranked first, followed by F. Reed Johnson (n = 37), Julie Ratcliffe (n = 36). The majority of the papers were conducted in the United States (n = 513) and the United Kingdom (n = 433). The top three cited journals were “Health Economics” (n = 981), “Value in Health” (n = 893), and “Pharmaceutical Economics” (n = 774), and the top three articles were “Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force,” “Conjoint analysis applications in health-a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force,” and “Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.” The research hotspots and trends included “health technology assessment,” “survival,” “preference based measure,” and “health state valuation.” Conclusion: The size of the literature about DCE studies in health care showed a noticeable increase in the past decade. The application of DCE in health care remains in an early growth phase, and “health technology assessment,” “survival,” “preference based measure,” and “health state valuation” reflected the latest research hotpots and future trends. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8212992/ /pubmed/34150710 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.673698 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wang, Wang, Wang, Li, Pang and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Wang, Yue
Wang, Zhangyi
Wang, Zhao
Li, Xuechun
Pang, Xiaoli
Wang, Shuling
Application of Discrete Choice Experiment in Health Care: A Bibliometric Analysis
title Application of Discrete Choice Experiment in Health Care: A Bibliometric Analysis
title_full Application of Discrete Choice Experiment in Health Care: A Bibliometric Analysis
title_fullStr Application of Discrete Choice Experiment in Health Care: A Bibliometric Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Application of Discrete Choice Experiment in Health Care: A Bibliometric Analysis
title_short Application of Discrete Choice Experiment in Health Care: A Bibliometric Analysis
title_sort application of discrete choice experiment in health care: a bibliometric analysis
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8212992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34150710
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.673698
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyue applicationofdiscretechoiceexperimentinhealthcareabibliometricanalysis
AT wangzhangyi applicationofdiscretechoiceexperimentinhealthcareabibliometricanalysis
AT wangzhao applicationofdiscretechoiceexperimentinhealthcareabibliometricanalysis
AT lixuechun applicationofdiscretechoiceexperimentinhealthcareabibliometricanalysis
AT pangxiaoli applicationofdiscretechoiceexperimentinhealthcareabibliometricanalysis
AT wangshuling applicationofdiscretechoiceexperimentinhealthcareabibliometricanalysis