Cargando…
Fusion proteins of biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA): A network meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of fusion proteins biologics (Etanercept (ETN), Anakinra (ANA), and Abatacept) combinations in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using network meta-analysis to rank those according to their performance medicines. The performance of these processes is ran...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8213327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34128886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026350 |
_version_ | 1783709822762352640 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Mingcai Tao, Mengjun Wang, Quanhai Lu, Xiaohua Yuan, Hui |
author_facet | Wu, Mingcai Tao, Mengjun Wang, Quanhai Lu, Xiaohua Yuan, Hui |
author_sort | Wu, Mingcai |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of fusion proteins biologics (Etanercept (ETN), Anakinra (ANA), and Abatacept) combinations in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using network meta-analysis to rank those according to their performance medicines. The performance of these processes is ranked according to the results of the analysis and an explanatory study of the possible results is carried out. METHODS: Multiple databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were used to identify applicable articles and collect relevant data to analyze using STATA (14.0) software. The literature included in this study was divided into a combination of a placebo, methotrexate (MTX), and an observation group (1 of the 3 drugs). The last search date was December 12, 2019. RESULTS: A total of 19 eligible randomized controlled trials of fusion proteins biologics were identified, a total of 1109 papers were included, and the results showed that the ETN + MTX had the highest probability of being the most clinically efficacious intervention, with a surface under the cumulative ranking curve of 91.6, was significantly superior (P < .05). Patients who had received ETN or ETN + MTX or ANA had effective compared with patients who had received placebo (95% CI 1.28%–8.47%; 1.92%–19.18%; 1.06%–10.45%). CONCLUSIONS: 1. The combination of ETN and MTX had the highest probability of optimal treatment compared to other drugs and 2. ENT, ENT + MTX, and ANA were effective in the treatment of RA compared to placebo. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8213327 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82133272021-06-21 Fusion proteins of biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA): A network meta-analysis Wu, Mingcai Tao, Mengjun Wang, Quanhai Lu, Xiaohua Yuan, Hui Medicine (Baltimore) 4400 BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of fusion proteins biologics (Etanercept (ETN), Anakinra (ANA), and Abatacept) combinations in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using network meta-analysis to rank those according to their performance medicines. The performance of these processes is ranked according to the results of the analysis and an explanatory study of the possible results is carried out. METHODS: Multiple databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were used to identify applicable articles and collect relevant data to analyze using STATA (14.0) software. The literature included in this study was divided into a combination of a placebo, methotrexate (MTX), and an observation group (1 of the 3 drugs). The last search date was December 12, 2019. RESULTS: A total of 19 eligible randomized controlled trials of fusion proteins biologics were identified, a total of 1109 papers were included, and the results showed that the ETN + MTX had the highest probability of being the most clinically efficacious intervention, with a surface under the cumulative ranking curve of 91.6, was significantly superior (P < .05). Patients who had received ETN or ETN + MTX or ANA had effective compared with patients who had received placebo (95% CI 1.28%–8.47%; 1.92%–19.18%; 1.06%–10.45%). CONCLUSIONS: 1. The combination of ETN and MTX had the highest probability of optimal treatment compared to other drugs and 2. ENT, ENT + MTX, and ANA were effective in the treatment of RA compared to placebo. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8213327/ /pubmed/34128886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026350 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | 4400 Wu, Mingcai Tao, Mengjun Wang, Quanhai Lu, Xiaohua Yuan, Hui Fusion proteins of biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA): A network meta-analysis |
title | Fusion proteins of biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA): A network meta-analysis |
title_full | Fusion proteins of biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA): A network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Fusion proteins of biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA): A network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Fusion proteins of biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA): A network meta-analysis |
title_short | Fusion proteins of biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA): A network meta-analysis |
title_sort | fusion proteins of biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (ra): a network meta-analysis |
topic | 4400 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8213327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34128886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026350 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wumingcai fusionproteinsofbiologicagentsinthetreatmentofrheumatoidarthritisraanetworkmetaanalysis AT taomengjun fusionproteinsofbiologicagentsinthetreatmentofrheumatoidarthritisraanetworkmetaanalysis AT wangquanhai fusionproteinsofbiologicagentsinthetreatmentofrheumatoidarthritisraanetworkmetaanalysis AT luxiaohua fusionproteinsofbiologicagentsinthetreatmentofrheumatoidarthritisraanetworkmetaanalysis AT yuanhui fusionproteinsofbiologicagentsinthetreatmentofrheumatoidarthritisraanetworkmetaanalysis |