Cargando…

Evaluation of the genalyte maverick SARS-CoV-2 multi-antigen serology panel

Serologic testing for SARS-CoV-2 can be used for evaluation of past infection in individual patients and for community seroprevalence studies. We evaluated the analytical and clinical performance of the Genalyte Maverick SARS-CoV-2 Multi-Antigen Serology Panel compared to the Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Donato, Leslie J., Theel, Elitza S., Baumann, Nikola A., Bridgeman, Amber R., Blommel, Joseph H., Wu, Yanhong, Karon, Brad S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8213521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35262016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcvp.2021.100030
_version_ 1783709865605070848
author Donato, Leslie J.
Theel, Elitza S.
Baumann, Nikola A.
Bridgeman, Amber R.
Blommel, Joseph H.
Wu, Yanhong
Karon, Brad S.
author_facet Donato, Leslie J.
Theel, Elitza S.
Baumann, Nikola A.
Bridgeman, Amber R.
Blommel, Joseph H.
Wu, Yanhong
Karon, Brad S.
author_sort Donato, Leslie J.
collection PubMed
description Serologic testing for SARS-CoV-2 can be used for evaluation of past infection in individual patients and for community seroprevalence studies. We evaluated the analytical and clinical performance of the Genalyte Maverick SARS-CoV-2 Multi-Antigen Serology Panel compared to the Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (NC) qualitative immunoassay, using well characterized clinical serum samples. A total of 143 pre-pandemic sera and 48 sera collected from patients with a negative molecular SARS-CoV-2 result were used for specificity studies. For sensitivity analyses, 179 sera were used, obtained 3-7 days, 8-14 days, or ≥ 15 days after symptom onset from patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Specificity was determined to be 95.3% (182/191) for the Genalyte Maverick. Overall sensitivity of the Genalyte Maverick was similar to that observed for the Roche Elecsys NC test, 79.3% (142/179) vs. 76.5% (137/179), respectively. Genalyte Maverick trended, without statistical significance, towards higher sensitivity as compared to the Roche Elecsys NC test in the 3-7 days (11/25 vs. 9/25, respectively) and 8-14 days (21/28 vs. 19/28, respectively) post-symptom onset sample sets, but was identical in the ≥ 15 days post-symptom onset group (106/116 vs. 106/116, respectively). Therefore, the Genalyte Maverick serologic test had similar overall sensitivity to the Roche Elecsys NC assay, but may have slightly improved sensitivity for early seroconversion. The lower Genalyte Maverick specificity as compared to the Roche Elecsys NC assay as reported by other studies (>99%), may necessitate confirmatory testing of positive Genalyte Maverick results if implemented for clinical use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8213521
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82135212021-06-21 Evaluation of the genalyte maverick SARS-CoV-2 multi-antigen serology panel Donato, Leslie J. Theel, Elitza S. Baumann, Nikola A. Bridgeman, Amber R. Blommel, Joseph H. Wu, Yanhong Karon, Brad S. Journal of Clinical Virology Plus Article Serologic testing for SARS-CoV-2 can be used for evaluation of past infection in individual patients and for community seroprevalence studies. We evaluated the analytical and clinical performance of the Genalyte Maverick SARS-CoV-2 Multi-Antigen Serology Panel compared to the Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (NC) qualitative immunoassay, using well characterized clinical serum samples. A total of 143 pre-pandemic sera and 48 sera collected from patients with a negative molecular SARS-CoV-2 result were used for specificity studies. For sensitivity analyses, 179 sera were used, obtained 3-7 days, 8-14 days, or ≥ 15 days after symptom onset from patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Specificity was determined to be 95.3% (182/191) for the Genalyte Maverick. Overall sensitivity of the Genalyte Maverick was similar to that observed for the Roche Elecsys NC test, 79.3% (142/179) vs. 76.5% (137/179), respectively. Genalyte Maverick trended, without statistical significance, towards higher sensitivity as compared to the Roche Elecsys NC test in the 3-7 days (11/25 vs. 9/25, respectively) and 8-14 days (21/28 vs. 19/28, respectively) post-symptom onset sample sets, but was identical in the ≥ 15 days post-symptom onset group (106/116 vs. 106/116, respectively). Therefore, the Genalyte Maverick serologic test had similar overall sensitivity to the Roche Elecsys NC assay, but may have slightly improved sensitivity for early seroconversion. The lower Genalyte Maverick specificity as compared to the Roche Elecsys NC assay as reported by other studies (>99%), may necessitate confirmatory testing of positive Genalyte Maverick results if implemented for clinical use. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021-09 2021-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8213521/ /pubmed/35262016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcvp.2021.100030 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Donato, Leslie J.
Theel, Elitza S.
Baumann, Nikola A.
Bridgeman, Amber R.
Blommel, Joseph H.
Wu, Yanhong
Karon, Brad S.
Evaluation of the genalyte maverick SARS-CoV-2 multi-antigen serology panel
title Evaluation of the genalyte maverick SARS-CoV-2 multi-antigen serology panel
title_full Evaluation of the genalyte maverick SARS-CoV-2 multi-antigen serology panel
title_fullStr Evaluation of the genalyte maverick SARS-CoV-2 multi-antigen serology panel
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the genalyte maverick SARS-CoV-2 multi-antigen serology panel
title_short Evaluation of the genalyte maverick SARS-CoV-2 multi-antigen serology panel
title_sort evaluation of the genalyte maverick sars-cov-2 multi-antigen serology panel
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8213521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35262016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcvp.2021.100030
work_keys_str_mv AT donatolesliej evaluationofthegenalytemavericksarscov2multiantigenserologypanel
AT theelelitzas evaluationofthegenalytemavericksarscov2multiantigenserologypanel
AT baumannnikolaa evaluationofthegenalytemavericksarscov2multiantigenserologypanel
AT bridgemanamberr evaluationofthegenalytemavericksarscov2multiantigenserologypanel
AT blommeljosephh evaluationofthegenalytemavericksarscov2multiantigenserologypanel
AT wuyanhong evaluationofthegenalytemavericksarscov2multiantigenserologypanel
AT karonbrads evaluationofthegenalytemavericksarscov2multiantigenserologypanel