Cargando…

Small single perivascular hepatocellular carcinoma: comparisons of radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation by using propensity score analysis

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the therapeutic outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) as first-line therapies in patients with small single perivascular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: A total of 144 eligible patients with small (≤ 3 cm) single perivascular...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: An, Chao, Li, Wang-Zhong, Huang, Zhi-Mei, Yu, Xiao-Ling, Han, Yu-Zhi, Liu, Fang-Yi, Wu, Song-Song, Yu, Jie, Liang, Ping, Huang, Jinhua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8213545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33399908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07571-5
_version_ 1783709871230681088
author An, Chao
Li, Wang-Zhong
Huang, Zhi-Mei
Yu, Xiao-Ling
Han, Yu-Zhi
Liu, Fang-Yi
Wu, Song-Song
Yu, Jie
Liang, Ping
Huang, Jinhua
author_facet An, Chao
Li, Wang-Zhong
Huang, Zhi-Mei
Yu, Xiao-Ling
Han, Yu-Zhi
Liu, Fang-Yi
Wu, Song-Song
Yu, Jie
Liang, Ping
Huang, Jinhua
author_sort An, Chao
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the therapeutic outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) as first-line therapies in patients with small single perivascular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: A total of 144 eligible patients with small (≤ 3 cm) single perivascular (proximity to hepatic and portal veins) HCC who underwent RFA (N = 70) or MWA (N = 74) as first-line treatment were included. The overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local tumor progression (LTP) rates between the two ablation modalities were compared. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to reduce selection bias. Subgroup analysis was performed according to the type of hepatic vessels. RESULTS: After a median follow-up time of 38.2 months, there were no significant differences in OS (5-year OS: RFA 77.7% vs. MWA 74.6%; p = 0.600) and DFS (5-year DFS: RFA 24.7% vs. MWA 40.4%; p = 0.570). However, a significantly higher LTP rate was observed in the RFA group than the MWA group (5-year LTP: RFA 24.3% vs. MWA 8.4%; p = 0.030). IPTW-adjusted analyses revealed similar results. The treatment modality (RFA vs. MWA: HR 7.861, 95% CI 1.642–37.635, p = 0.010) was an independent prognostic factor for LTP. We observed a significant interaction effect of ablation modality and type of peritumoral vessel on LTP (p = 0.034). For patients with periportal HCC, the LTP rate was significantly higher in the RFA group than in the MWA group (p = 0.045). However, this difference was not observed in patients with perivenous HCC (p = 0.116). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a small single periportal HCC, MWA exhibited better tumor control than RFA. KEY POINTS: • Microwave ablation exhibited better local tumor control than radiofrequency ablation for small single periportal hepatocellular carcinoma. • There was a significant interaction between the treatment effect of ablation modality and type of peritumoral vessel on local tumor progression. • The type of peritumoral vessel is vital in choosing ablation modalities for hepatocellular carcinoma. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-020-07571-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8213545
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82135452021-07-01 Small single perivascular hepatocellular carcinoma: comparisons of radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation by using propensity score analysis An, Chao Li, Wang-Zhong Huang, Zhi-Mei Yu, Xiao-Ling Han, Yu-Zhi Liu, Fang-Yi Wu, Song-Song Yu, Jie Liang, Ping Huang, Jinhua Eur Radiol Hepatobiliary-Pancreas OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the therapeutic outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) as first-line therapies in patients with small single perivascular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: A total of 144 eligible patients with small (≤ 3 cm) single perivascular (proximity to hepatic and portal veins) HCC who underwent RFA (N = 70) or MWA (N = 74) as first-line treatment were included. The overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local tumor progression (LTP) rates between the two ablation modalities were compared. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to reduce selection bias. Subgroup analysis was performed according to the type of hepatic vessels. RESULTS: After a median follow-up time of 38.2 months, there were no significant differences in OS (5-year OS: RFA 77.7% vs. MWA 74.6%; p = 0.600) and DFS (5-year DFS: RFA 24.7% vs. MWA 40.4%; p = 0.570). However, a significantly higher LTP rate was observed in the RFA group than the MWA group (5-year LTP: RFA 24.3% vs. MWA 8.4%; p = 0.030). IPTW-adjusted analyses revealed similar results. The treatment modality (RFA vs. MWA: HR 7.861, 95% CI 1.642–37.635, p = 0.010) was an independent prognostic factor for LTP. We observed a significant interaction effect of ablation modality and type of peritumoral vessel on LTP (p = 0.034). For patients with periportal HCC, the LTP rate was significantly higher in the RFA group than in the MWA group (p = 0.045). However, this difference was not observed in patients with perivenous HCC (p = 0.116). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a small single periportal HCC, MWA exhibited better tumor control than RFA. KEY POINTS: • Microwave ablation exhibited better local tumor control than radiofrequency ablation for small single periportal hepatocellular carcinoma. • There was a significant interaction between the treatment effect of ablation modality and type of peritumoral vessel on local tumor progression. • The type of peritumoral vessel is vital in choosing ablation modalities for hepatocellular carcinoma. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-020-07571-5. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-01-05 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8213545/ /pubmed/33399908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07571-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Hepatobiliary-Pancreas
An, Chao
Li, Wang-Zhong
Huang, Zhi-Mei
Yu, Xiao-Ling
Han, Yu-Zhi
Liu, Fang-Yi
Wu, Song-Song
Yu, Jie
Liang, Ping
Huang, Jinhua
Small single perivascular hepatocellular carcinoma: comparisons of radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation by using propensity score analysis
title Small single perivascular hepatocellular carcinoma: comparisons of radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation by using propensity score analysis
title_full Small single perivascular hepatocellular carcinoma: comparisons of radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation by using propensity score analysis
title_fullStr Small single perivascular hepatocellular carcinoma: comparisons of radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation by using propensity score analysis
title_full_unstemmed Small single perivascular hepatocellular carcinoma: comparisons of radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation by using propensity score analysis
title_short Small single perivascular hepatocellular carcinoma: comparisons of radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation by using propensity score analysis
title_sort small single perivascular hepatocellular carcinoma: comparisons of radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation by using propensity score analysis
topic Hepatobiliary-Pancreas
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8213545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33399908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07571-5
work_keys_str_mv AT anchao smallsingleperivascularhepatocellularcarcinomacomparisonsofradiofrequencyablationandmicrowaveablationbyusingpropensityscoreanalysis
AT liwangzhong smallsingleperivascularhepatocellularcarcinomacomparisonsofradiofrequencyablationandmicrowaveablationbyusingpropensityscoreanalysis
AT huangzhimei smallsingleperivascularhepatocellularcarcinomacomparisonsofradiofrequencyablationandmicrowaveablationbyusingpropensityscoreanalysis
AT yuxiaoling smallsingleperivascularhepatocellularcarcinomacomparisonsofradiofrequencyablationandmicrowaveablationbyusingpropensityscoreanalysis
AT hanyuzhi smallsingleperivascularhepatocellularcarcinomacomparisonsofradiofrequencyablationandmicrowaveablationbyusingpropensityscoreanalysis
AT liufangyi smallsingleperivascularhepatocellularcarcinomacomparisonsofradiofrequencyablationandmicrowaveablationbyusingpropensityscoreanalysis
AT wusongsong smallsingleperivascularhepatocellularcarcinomacomparisonsofradiofrequencyablationandmicrowaveablationbyusingpropensityscoreanalysis
AT yujie smallsingleperivascularhepatocellularcarcinomacomparisonsofradiofrequencyablationandmicrowaveablationbyusingpropensityscoreanalysis
AT liangping smallsingleperivascularhepatocellularcarcinomacomparisonsofradiofrequencyablationandmicrowaveablationbyusingpropensityscoreanalysis
AT huangjinhua smallsingleperivascularhepatocellularcarcinomacomparisonsofradiofrequencyablationandmicrowaveablationbyusingpropensityscoreanalysis