Exploring Perceived Barriers and Facilitators of PrEP Uptake among Young People in Uganda, Zimbabwe, and South Africa

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective HIV prevention strategy. Few studies have explored adolescents and young people’s perspectives toward PrEP. We conducted 24 group discussions and 60 in-depth interviews with males and females aged 13–24 years in Uganda, Zimbabwe, and South Africa betwe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muhumuza, Richard, Ssemata, Andrew Sentoogo, Kakande, Ayoub, Ahmed, Nadia, Atujuna, Millicent, Nomvuyo, Mangxilana, Bekker, Linda-Gail, Dietrich, Janan Janine, Tshabalala, Gugulethu, Hornschuh, Stefanie, Maluadzi, Mamakiri, Chibanda-Stranix, Lynda, Nematadzira, Teacler, Weiss, Helen Anne, Nash, Stephen, Fox, Julie, Seeley, Janet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Original Paper
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8213546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33954824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01880-y
Descripción
Sumario:Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective HIV prevention strategy. Few studies have explored adolescents and young people’s perspectives toward PrEP. We conducted 24 group discussions and 60 in-depth interviews with males and females aged 13–24 years in Uganda, Zimbabwe, and South Africa between September 2018 and February 2019. We used the framework approach to generate themes and key concepts for analysis following the social ecological model. Young people expressed a willingness to use PrEP and identified potential barriers and facilitators of PrEP uptake. Barriers included factors at individual (fear of HIV, fear of side effects, and PrEP characteristics), interpersonal (parental influence, absence of a sexual partner), community (peer influence, social stigma), institutional (long waiting times at clinics, attitudes of health workers), and structural (cost of PrEP and mode of administration, accessibility concerns) levels. Facilitators included factors at individual (high HIV risk perception and preventing HIV/desire to remain HIV negative), interpersonal (peer influence, social support and care for PrEP uptake), community (adequate PrEP information and sensitization, evidence of PrEP efficacy and safety), institutional (convenient and responsive services, provision of appropriate and sufficiently resourced services), and structural (access and availability of PrEP, cost of PrEP) levels. The findings indicated that PrEP is an acceptable HIV prevention method. PrEP uptake is linked to personal and environmental factors that need to be considered for successful PrEP roll-out. Multi-level interventions needed to promote PrEP uptake should consider the social and structural drivers and focus on ways that can inspire PrEP uptake and limit the barriers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10508-020-01880-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Ejemplares similares