Cargando…

What is the best long-term treatment modality for immature permanent teeth with pulp necrosis and apical periodontitis?

PURPOSE: To evaluate and assess the current knowledge about apexification and regenerative techniques as a meaningful treatment modality and to map the scientific evidence for the efficacy of both methods for the management of traumatised immature teeth with pulp necrosis and apical periodontitis. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wikström, A., Brundin, M., Lopes, M. F., El Sayed, M., Tsilingaridis, G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8213569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33420674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40368-020-00575-1
_version_ 1783709876333051904
author Wikström, A.
Brundin, M.
Lopes, M. F.
El Sayed, M.
Tsilingaridis, G.
author_facet Wikström, A.
Brundin, M.
Lopes, M. F.
El Sayed, M.
Tsilingaridis, G.
author_sort Wikström, A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate and assess the current knowledge about apexification and regenerative techniques as a meaningful treatment modality and to map the scientific evidence for the efficacy of both methods for the management of traumatised immature teeth with pulp necrosis and apical periodontitis. METHODS: This systematic review searched five databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Ovid (Medline), and Embase. Published articles written in English were considered for inclusion. The following keywords were used: Regenerative endodontic treatment OR regenerat* OR revital* OR endodontic regeneration OR regenerative endodontics OR pulp revascularization OR revasculari* OR ‘traumatized immature teeth’. Only peer-reviewed studies with a study size of at least 20 cases followed up for 24 months were included. Eligibility assessment was performed independently in a blinded manner by three reviewers and disagreements were resolved by consensus. Subgroup analyses were performed on three clinical outcomes: survival, success, and continued root development. RESULTS: Seven full texts out of 1359 citations were included and conventional content analysis was performed. Most of the identified citations were case reports and case series. CONCLUSIONS: In the present systematic review, the qualitative analysis revealed that both regenerative and apexification techniques had equal rates of success and survival and proved to be effective in the treatment of immature necrotic permanent teeth. Endodontic regenerative techniques appear to be superior to apexification techniques in terms of stimulation of root maturation, i.e. root wall thickening and root lengthening. Knowledge gaps were identified regarding the treatment and follow-up protocols for both techniques. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40368-020-00575-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8213569
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82135692021-07-01 What is the best long-term treatment modality for immature permanent teeth with pulp necrosis and apical periodontitis? Wikström, A. Brundin, M. Lopes, M. F. El Sayed, M. Tsilingaridis, G. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent Systematic Review PURPOSE: To evaluate and assess the current knowledge about apexification and regenerative techniques as a meaningful treatment modality and to map the scientific evidence for the efficacy of both methods for the management of traumatised immature teeth with pulp necrosis and apical periodontitis. METHODS: This systematic review searched five databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Ovid (Medline), and Embase. Published articles written in English were considered for inclusion. The following keywords were used: Regenerative endodontic treatment OR regenerat* OR revital* OR endodontic regeneration OR regenerative endodontics OR pulp revascularization OR revasculari* OR ‘traumatized immature teeth’. Only peer-reviewed studies with a study size of at least 20 cases followed up for 24 months were included. Eligibility assessment was performed independently in a blinded manner by three reviewers and disagreements were resolved by consensus. Subgroup analyses were performed on three clinical outcomes: survival, success, and continued root development. RESULTS: Seven full texts out of 1359 citations were included and conventional content analysis was performed. Most of the identified citations were case reports and case series. CONCLUSIONS: In the present systematic review, the qualitative analysis revealed that both regenerative and apexification techniques had equal rates of success and survival and proved to be effective in the treatment of immature necrotic permanent teeth. Endodontic regenerative techniques appear to be superior to apexification techniques in terms of stimulation of root maturation, i.e. root wall thickening and root lengthening. Knowledge gaps were identified regarding the treatment and follow-up protocols for both techniques. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40368-020-00575-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-01-08 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8213569/ /pubmed/33420674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40368-020-00575-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Wikström, A.
Brundin, M.
Lopes, M. F.
El Sayed, M.
Tsilingaridis, G.
What is the best long-term treatment modality for immature permanent teeth with pulp necrosis and apical periodontitis?
title What is the best long-term treatment modality for immature permanent teeth with pulp necrosis and apical periodontitis?
title_full What is the best long-term treatment modality for immature permanent teeth with pulp necrosis and apical periodontitis?
title_fullStr What is the best long-term treatment modality for immature permanent teeth with pulp necrosis and apical periodontitis?
title_full_unstemmed What is the best long-term treatment modality for immature permanent teeth with pulp necrosis and apical periodontitis?
title_short What is the best long-term treatment modality for immature permanent teeth with pulp necrosis and apical periodontitis?
title_sort what is the best long-term treatment modality for immature permanent teeth with pulp necrosis and apical periodontitis?
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8213569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33420674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40368-020-00575-1
work_keys_str_mv AT wikstroma whatisthebestlongtermtreatmentmodalityforimmaturepermanentteethwithpulpnecrosisandapicalperiodontitis
AT brundinm whatisthebestlongtermtreatmentmodalityforimmaturepermanentteethwithpulpnecrosisandapicalperiodontitis
AT lopesmf whatisthebestlongtermtreatmentmodalityforimmaturepermanentteethwithpulpnecrosisandapicalperiodontitis
AT elsayedm whatisthebestlongtermtreatmentmodalityforimmaturepermanentteethwithpulpnecrosisandapicalperiodontitis
AT tsilingaridisg whatisthebestlongtermtreatmentmodalityforimmaturepermanentteethwithpulpnecrosisandapicalperiodontitis