Cargando…

Untangling the influence of biotic and abiotic factors on habitat selection by a tropical rodent

Understanding how animal populations respond to environmental factors is critical because large-scale environmental processes (e.g., habitat fragmentation, climate change) are impacting ecosystems at unprecedented rates. On an overgrazed floodplain in north-western Australia, a native rodent (Pale F...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ward-Fear, Georgia, Brown, Gregory P., Pearson, David, Shine, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8213835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34145308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91748-5
_version_ 1783709939690110976
author Ward-Fear, Georgia
Brown, Gregory P.
Pearson, David
Shine, Richard
author_facet Ward-Fear, Georgia
Brown, Gregory P.
Pearson, David
Shine, Richard
author_sort Ward-Fear, Georgia
collection PubMed
description Understanding how animal populations respond to environmental factors is critical because large-scale environmental processes (e.g., habitat fragmentation, climate change) are impacting ecosystems at unprecedented rates. On an overgrazed floodplain in north-western Australia, a native rodent (Pale Field Rat, Rattus tunneyi) constructs its burrows primarily beneath an invasive tree (Chinee Apple, Ziziphus mauritiana) rather than native trees. The dense thorny foliage of the Chinee Apple may allow high rat densities either because of abiotic effects (shade, in a very hot environment) or biotic processes (protection from trampling and soil compaction by feral horses, and/or predation). To distinguish between these hypotheses, we manipulated Chinee Apple foliage to modify biotic factors (access to horses and predators) but not shade levels. We surveyed the rat population with Elliott traps under treatment and control trees and in the open woodland, in two seasons (the breeding season—January, and the nesting season—May). In the breeding season, we ran giving-up density experiments (GUD) with food trays, to assess the perceived risk of predation by rats across our three treatments. Selective trimming of foliage did not affect thermal regimes underneath the trees but did allow ingress of horses and we observed two collapsed burrows as a consequence (although long term impacts of horses were not measured). The perceived predation risk also increased (GUD values at food trays increased) and was highest in the open woodland. Our manipulation resulted in a shift in rat sex ratios (indicating female preference for breeding under control but not foliage-trimmed trees) and influenced rat behaviour (giving-up densities increased; large dominant males inhabited the control but not treatment trees). Our data suggest that the primary benefit of the Chinee Apple tree to native rodents lies in physical protection from predators and (potentially) feral horses, rather than in providing cooler microhabitat.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8213835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82138352021-06-22 Untangling the influence of biotic and abiotic factors on habitat selection by a tropical rodent Ward-Fear, Georgia Brown, Gregory P. Pearson, David Shine, Richard Sci Rep Article Understanding how animal populations respond to environmental factors is critical because large-scale environmental processes (e.g., habitat fragmentation, climate change) are impacting ecosystems at unprecedented rates. On an overgrazed floodplain in north-western Australia, a native rodent (Pale Field Rat, Rattus tunneyi) constructs its burrows primarily beneath an invasive tree (Chinee Apple, Ziziphus mauritiana) rather than native trees. The dense thorny foliage of the Chinee Apple may allow high rat densities either because of abiotic effects (shade, in a very hot environment) or biotic processes (protection from trampling and soil compaction by feral horses, and/or predation). To distinguish between these hypotheses, we manipulated Chinee Apple foliage to modify biotic factors (access to horses and predators) but not shade levels. We surveyed the rat population with Elliott traps under treatment and control trees and in the open woodland, in two seasons (the breeding season—January, and the nesting season—May). In the breeding season, we ran giving-up density experiments (GUD) with food trays, to assess the perceived risk of predation by rats across our three treatments. Selective trimming of foliage did not affect thermal regimes underneath the trees but did allow ingress of horses and we observed two collapsed burrows as a consequence (although long term impacts of horses were not measured). The perceived predation risk also increased (GUD values at food trays increased) and was highest in the open woodland. Our manipulation resulted in a shift in rat sex ratios (indicating female preference for breeding under control but not foliage-trimmed trees) and influenced rat behaviour (giving-up densities increased; large dominant males inhabited the control but not treatment trees). Our data suggest that the primary benefit of the Chinee Apple tree to native rodents lies in physical protection from predators and (potentially) feral horses, rather than in providing cooler microhabitat. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8213835/ /pubmed/34145308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91748-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Ward-Fear, Georgia
Brown, Gregory P.
Pearson, David
Shine, Richard
Untangling the influence of biotic and abiotic factors on habitat selection by a tropical rodent
title Untangling the influence of biotic and abiotic factors on habitat selection by a tropical rodent
title_full Untangling the influence of biotic and abiotic factors on habitat selection by a tropical rodent
title_fullStr Untangling the influence of biotic and abiotic factors on habitat selection by a tropical rodent
title_full_unstemmed Untangling the influence of biotic and abiotic factors on habitat selection by a tropical rodent
title_short Untangling the influence of biotic and abiotic factors on habitat selection by a tropical rodent
title_sort untangling the influence of biotic and abiotic factors on habitat selection by a tropical rodent
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8213835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34145308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91748-5
work_keys_str_mv AT wardfeargeorgia untanglingtheinfluenceofbioticandabioticfactorsonhabitatselectionbyatropicalrodent
AT browngregoryp untanglingtheinfluenceofbioticandabioticfactorsonhabitatselectionbyatropicalrodent
AT pearsondavid untanglingtheinfluenceofbioticandabioticfactorsonhabitatselectionbyatropicalrodent
AT shinerichard untanglingtheinfluenceofbioticandabioticfactorsonhabitatselectionbyatropicalrodent