Cargando…

Safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in wake‐up stroke: Experiences from a single center

OBJECTIVES: Wake‐up stroke is an important clinical problem that may account for a quarter of all ischemic strokes. This study aimed to establish the safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolytic treatment of wake‐up strokes by comparing it to the standard thrombolysis treatment in strokes with cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Wiśniewski, Adam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8213934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33939326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2152
_version_ 1783709958183845888
author Wiśniewski, Adam
author_facet Wiśniewski, Adam
author_sort Wiśniewski, Adam
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Wake‐up stroke is an important clinical problem that may account for a quarter of all ischemic strokes. This study aimed to establish the safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolytic treatment of wake‐up strokes by comparing it to the standard thrombolysis treatment in strokes with clear onsets and wake‐up strokes that did not receive reperfusion therapy. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 95 patients with ischemic strokes who underwent thrombolytic treatment with alteplase, including nine patients with wake‐up strokes. The safety profile (mortality and intracranial bleeding) and efficacy (clinical and functional outcomes on admission, discharge, and 90 days after stroke onset) were evaluated. RESULTS: When assessed using the modified Rankin scale (mRs), the patients with wake‐up strokes had significantly more favorable functional outcomes on discharge when compared to those who received standard thrombolysis (p = .0289). No significant differences were noted when the favorable outcome rate (mRs score = 0–2) at three months post‐thrombolysis (Odds ratio [OR] = 2.07; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.41–10.6; p = .3807) and safety outcomes (death during hospitalization: OR = 0.49; 95% CI = 0.03–9.11; p = .6295 and intracranial bleeding 24 hr after treatment: OR = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.02–7.58; p = .5707) were compared between the two groups. The Cochran–Mantel–Haenchel shift analysis showed a significantly more favorable distribution of the mRs scores at three months after the stroke onset in the patients with wake‐up strokes who were treated with alteplase compared to those who did not receive thrombolysis (OR = 1.42; 95% CI = 1.01–1.82; p = .0426). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that in patients who awaken with stroke symptoms, intravenous thrombolytic treatment is a safe procedure that may lead to favorable outcomes. Further studies should be performed to increase the size of the group of patients with wake‐up strokes who can be treated with reperfusion therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8213934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82139342021-06-28 Safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in wake‐up stroke: Experiences from a single center Wiśniewski, Adam Brain Behav Original Research OBJECTIVES: Wake‐up stroke is an important clinical problem that may account for a quarter of all ischemic strokes. This study aimed to establish the safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolytic treatment of wake‐up strokes by comparing it to the standard thrombolysis treatment in strokes with clear onsets and wake‐up strokes that did not receive reperfusion therapy. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 95 patients with ischemic strokes who underwent thrombolytic treatment with alteplase, including nine patients with wake‐up strokes. The safety profile (mortality and intracranial bleeding) and efficacy (clinical and functional outcomes on admission, discharge, and 90 days after stroke onset) were evaluated. RESULTS: When assessed using the modified Rankin scale (mRs), the patients with wake‐up strokes had significantly more favorable functional outcomes on discharge when compared to those who received standard thrombolysis (p = .0289). No significant differences were noted when the favorable outcome rate (mRs score = 0–2) at three months post‐thrombolysis (Odds ratio [OR] = 2.07; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.41–10.6; p = .3807) and safety outcomes (death during hospitalization: OR = 0.49; 95% CI = 0.03–9.11; p = .6295 and intracranial bleeding 24 hr after treatment: OR = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.02–7.58; p = .5707) were compared between the two groups. The Cochran–Mantel–Haenchel shift analysis showed a significantly more favorable distribution of the mRs scores at three months after the stroke onset in the patients with wake‐up strokes who were treated with alteplase compared to those who did not receive thrombolysis (OR = 1.42; 95% CI = 1.01–1.82; p = .0426). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that in patients who awaken with stroke symptoms, intravenous thrombolytic treatment is a safe procedure that may lead to favorable outcomes. Further studies should be performed to increase the size of the group of patients with wake‐up strokes who can be treated with reperfusion therapy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8213934/ /pubmed/33939326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2152 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Wiśniewski, Adam
Safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in wake‐up stroke: Experiences from a single center
title Safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in wake‐up stroke: Experiences from a single center
title_full Safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in wake‐up stroke: Experiences from a single center
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in wake‐up stroke: Experiences from a single center
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in wake‐up stroke: Experiences from a single center
title_short Safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in wake‐up stroke: Experiences from a single center
title_sort safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in wake‐up stroke: experiences from a single center
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8213934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33939326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2152
work_keys_str_mv AT wisniewskiadam safetyandefficacyofintravenousthrombolytictreatmentinwakeupstrokeexperiencesfromasinglecenter