Cargando…
External validation of the IMPROVE-DD risk assessment model for venous thromboembolism among inpatients with COVID-19
There is a need to discriminate which COVID-19 inpatients are at higher risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) to inform prophylaxis strategies. The IMPROVE-DD VTE risk assessment model (RAM) has previously demonstrated good discrimination in non-COVID populations. We aimed to externally validate the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8214061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34146235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11239-021-02504-5 |
_version_ | 1783709983136808960 |
---|---|
author | Goldin, Mark Lin, Stephanie K. Kohn, Nina Qiu, Michael Cohen, Stuart L. Barish, Matthew A. Gianos, Eugenia Diaz, Anise Richardson, Safiya Giannis, Dimitrios Chatterjee, Saurav Coppa, Kevin Hirsch, Jamie S. Ngu, Sam Firoozan, Sheila McGinn, Thomas Spyropoulos, Alex C. |
author_facet | Goldin, Mark Lin, Stephanie K. Kohn, Nina Qiu, Michael Cohen, Stuart L. Barish, Matthew A. Gianos, Eugenia Diaz, Anise Richardson, Safiya Giannis, Dimitrios Chatterjee, Saurav Coppa, Kevin Hirsch, Jamie S. Ngu, Sam Firoozan, Sheila McGinn, Thomas Spyropoulos, Alex C. |
author_sort | Goldin, Mark |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is a need to discriminate which COVID-19 inpatients are at higher risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) to inform prophylaxis strategies. The IMPROVE-DD VTE risk assessment model (RAM) has previously demonstrated good discrimination in non-COVID populations. We aimed to externally validate the IMPROVE-DD VTE RAM in medical patients hospitalized with COVID-19. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the IMPROVE-DD VTE RAM in adult patients with COVID-19 admitted to one of thirteen Northwell Health hospitals in the New York metropolitan area between March 1, 2020 and April 27, 2020. VTE was defined as new-onset symptomatic deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. To assess the predictive value of the RAM, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. Of 9407 patients who met study criteria, 274 patients developed VTE with a prevalence of 2.91%. The VTE rate was 0.41% for IMPROVE-DD score 0–1 (low risk), 1.21% for score 2–3 (moderate risk), and 5.30% for score ≥ 4 (high risk). Approximately 45.7% of patients were classified as high VTE risk, 33.3% moderate risk, and 21.0% low risk. Discrimination of low versus moderate-high VTE risk demonstrated sensitivity 0.971, specificity 0.215, PPV 0.036, and NPV 0.996. ROC AUC was 0.703. In this external validation study, the IMPROVE-DD VTE RAM demonstrated very good discrimination to identify hospitalized COVID-19 patients at low, moderate, and high VTE risk. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8214061 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82140612021-06-21 External validation of the IMPROVE-DD risk assessment model for venous thromboembolism among inpatients with COVID-19 Goldin, Mark Lin, Stephanie K. Kohn, Nina Qiu, Michael Cohen, Stuart L. Barish, Matthew A. Gianos, Eugenia Diaz, Anise Richardson, Safiya Giannis, Dimitrios Chatterjee, Saurav Coppa, Kevin Hirsch, Jamie S. Ngu, Sam Firoozan, Sheila McGinn, Thomas Spyropoulos, Alex C. J Thromb Thrombolysis Article There is a need to discriminate which COVID-19 inpatients are at higher risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) to inform prophylaxis strategies. The IMPROVE-DD VTE risk assessment model (RAM) has previously demonstrated good discrimination in non-COVID populations. We aimed to externally validate the IMPROVE-DD VTE RAM in medical patients hospitalized with COVID-19. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the IMPROVE-DD VTE RAM in adult patients with COVID-19 admitted to one of thirteen Northwell Health hospitals in the New York metropolitan area between March 1, 2020 and April 27, 2020. VTE was defined as new-onset symptomatic deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. To assess the predictive value of the RAM, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. Of 9407 patients who met study criteria, 274 patients developed VTE with a prevalence of 2.91%. The VTE rate was 0.41% for IMPROVE-DD score 0–1 (low risk), 1.21% for score 2–3 (moderate risk), and 5.30% for score ≥ 4 (high risk). Approximately 45.7% of patients were classified as high VTE risk, 33.3% moderate risk, and 21.0% low risk. Discrimination of low versus moderate-high VTE risk demonstrated sensitivity 0.971, specificity 0.215, PPV 0.036, and NPV 0.996. ROC AUC was 0.703. In this external validation study, the IMPROVE-DD VTE RAM demonstrated very good discrimination to identify hospitalized COVID-19 patients at low, moderate, and high VTE risk. Springer US 2021-06-19 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8214061/ /pubmed/34146235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11239-021-02504-5 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Goldin, Mark Lin, Stephanie K. Kohn, Nina Qiu, Michael Cohen, Stuart L. Barish, Matthew A. Gianos, Eugenia Diaz, Anise Richardson, Safiya Giannis, Dimitrios Chatterjee, Saurav Coppa, Kevin Hirsch, Jamie S. Ngu, Sam Firoozan, Sheila McGinn, Thomas Spyropoulos, Alex C. External validation of the IMPROVE-DD risk assessment model for venous thromboembolism among inpatients with COVID-19 |
title | External validation of the IMPROVE-DD risk assessment model for venous thromboembolism among inpatients with COVID-19 |
title_full | External validation of the IMPROVE-DD risk assessment model for venous thromboembolism among inpatients with COVID-19 |
title_fullStr | External validation of the IMPROVE-DD risk assessment model for venous thromboembolism among inpatients with COVID-19 |
title_full_unstemmed | External validation of the IMPROVE-DD risk assessment model for venous thromboembolism among inpatients with COVID-19 |
title_short | External validation of the IMPROVE-DD risk assessment model for venous thromboembolism among inpatients with COVID-19 |
title_sort | external validation of the improve-dd risk assessment model for venous thromboembolism among inpatients with covid-19 |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8214061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34146235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11239-021-02504-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goldinmark externalvalidationoftheimproveddriskassessmentmodelforvenousthromboembolismamonginpatientswithcovid19 AT linstephaniek externalvalidationoftheimproveddriskassessmentmodelforvenousthromboembolismamonginpatientswithcovid19 AT kohnnina externalvalidationoftheimproveddriskassessmentmodelforvenousthromboembolismamonginpatientswithcovid19 AT qiumichael externalvalidationoftheimproveddriskassessmentmodelforvenousthromboembolismamonginpatientswithcovid19 AT cohenstuartl externalvalidationoftheimproveddriskassessmentmodelforvenousthromboembolismamonginpatientswithcovid19 AT barishmatthewa externalvalidationoftheimproveddriskassessmentmodelforvenousthromboembolismamonginpatientswithcovid19 AT gianoseugenia externalvalidationoftheimproveddriskassessmentmodelforvenousthromboembolismamonginpatientswithcovid19 AT diazanise externalvalidationoftheimproveddriskassessmentmodelforvenousthromboembolismamonginpatientswithcovid19 AT richardsonsafiya externalvalidationoftheimproveddriskassessmentmodelforvenousthromboembolismamonginpatientswithcovid19 AT giannisdimitrios externalvalidationoftheimproveddriskassessmentmodelforvenousthromboembolismamonginpatientswithcovid19 AT chatterjeesaurav externalvalidationoftheimproveddriskassessmentmodelforvenousthromboembolismamonginpatientswithcovid19 AT coppakevin externalvalidationoftheimproveddriskassessmentmodelforvenousthromboembolismamonginpatientswithcovid19 AT hirschjamies externalvalidationoftheimproveddriskassessmentmodelforvenousthromboembolismamonginpatientswithcovid19 AT ngusam externalvalidationoftheimproveddriskassessmentmodelforvenousthromboembolismamonginpatientswithcovid19 AT firoozansheila externalvalidationoftheimproveddriskassessmentmodelforvenousthromboembolismamonginpatientswithcovid19 AT mcginnthomas externalvalidationoftheimproveddriskassessmentmodelforvenousthromboembolismamonginpatientswithcovid19 AT spyropoulosalexc externalvalidationoftheimproveddriskassessmentmodelforvenousthromboembolismamonginpatientswithcovid19 |