Cargando…

Skin Quality – A Holistic 360° View: Consensus Results

INTRODUCTION: Skin quality is an important component of human attractiveness. To date, there are no standardized criteria for good skin quality. To establish a consensus for good skin quality parameters and measurement and treatment options, a virtual skin quality advisory board consisting of a glob...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goldie, Kate, Kerscher, Martina, Fabi, Sabrina Guillen, Hirano, Cyro, Landau, Marina, Lim, Ting Song, Woolery-Lloyd, Heather, Mariwalla, Kavita, Park, Je-Young, Yutskovskaya, Yana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8214518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34163203
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S309374
_version_ 1783710079914082304
author Goldie, Kate
Kerscher, Martina
Fabi, Sabrina Guillen
Hirano, Cyro
Landau, Marina
Lim, Ting Song
Woolery-Lloyd, Heather
Mariwalla, Kavita
Park, Je-Young
Yutskovskaya, Yana
author_facet Goldie, Kate
Kerscher, Martina
Fabi, Sabrina Guillen
Hirano, Cyro
Landau, Marina
Lim, Ting Song
Woolery-Lloyd, Heather
Mariwalla, Kavita
Park, Je-Young
Yutskovskaya, Yana
author_sort Goldie, Kate
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Skin quality is an important component of human attractiveness. To date, there are no standardized criteria for good skin quality. To establish a consensus for good skin quality parameters and measurement and treatment options, a virtual skin quality advisory board consisting of a global panel of highly experienced aesthetic dermatologists/aesthetic physicians was convened. METHODS: A total of 10 dermatologists/aesthetic physicians served on the advisory board. A modified version of the Delphi method was used to arrive at consensus. Members accessed an online platform to review statements on skin quality criteria from their peers, including treatment and measurement options, and voted to indicate whether they agreed or disagreed. Statements that did not have agreement were modified and the members voted again. Consensus was defined as: strong consensus = greater than 95% agreement; consensus = 75% to 95% agreement; majority consent = 50% to 75% agreement; no consensus = less than 50% agreement. RESULTS: There was strong consensus that good skin quality is defined as healthy, youthful in appearance (appearing younger than a person’s chronological age), undamaged skin and that skin quality can be described across all ethnicities by four emergent perceptual categories (EPCs): skin tone evenness, skin surface evenness, skin firmness, and skin glow. The EPCs can be affected by multiple tissue layers (ie, skin surface quality can stem from and be impacted by deep structures or tissues). This means that topical approaches may not be sufficient. Instead, improving skin quality EPCs can require a multilayer treatment strategy. CONCLUSION: This global advisory board established strong consensus that skin quality can be described by four EPCs, which can help clinicians determine the appropriate treatment option(s) and the tissue or skin layer(s) to address. Skin quality is important to human health and wellbeing and patients’ perception for the need for aesthetic treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8214518
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82145182021-06-22 Skin Quality – A Holistic 360° View: Consensus Results Goldie, Kate Kerscher, Martina Fabi, Sabrina Guillen Hirano, Cyro Landau, Marina Lim, Ting Song Woolery-Lloyd, Heather Mariwalla, Kavita Park, Je-Young Yutskovskaya, Yana Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol Original Research INTRODUCTION: Skin quality is an important component of human attractiveness. To date, there are no standardized criteria for good skin quality. To establish a consensus for good skin quality parameters and measurement and treatment options, a virtual skin quality advisory board consisting of a global panel of highly experienced aesthetic dermatologists/aesthetic physicians was convened. METHODS: A total of 10 dermatologists/aesthetic physicians served on the advisory board. A modified version of the Delphi method was used to arrive at consensus. Members accessed an online platform to review statements on skin quality criteria from their peers, including treatment and measurement options, and voted to indicate whether they agreed or disagreed. Statements that did not have agreement were modified and the members voted again. Consensus was defined as: strong consensus = greater than 95% agreement; consensus = 75% to 95% agreement; majority consent = 50% to 75% agreement; no consensus = less than 50% agreement. RESULTS: There was strong consensus that good skin quality is defined as healthy, youthful in appearance (appearing younger than a person’s chronological age), undamaged skin and that skin quality can be described across all ethnicities by four emergent perceptual categories (EPCs): skin tone evenness, skin surface evenness, skin firmness, and skin glow. The EPCs can be affected by multiple tissue layers (ie, skin surface quality can stem from and be impacted by deep structures or tissues). This means that topical approaches may not be sufficient. Instead, improving skin quality EPCs can require a multilayer treatment strategy. CONCLUSION: This global advisory board established strong consensus that skin quality can be described by four EPCs, which can help clinicians determine the appropriate treatment option(s) and the tissue or skin layer(s) to address. Skin quality is important to human health and wellbeing and patients’ perception for the need for aesthetic treatment. Dove 2021-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8214518/ /pubmed/34163203 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S309374 Text en © 2021 Goldie et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Goldie, Kate
Kerscher, Martina
Fabi, Sabrina Guillen
Hirano, Cyro
Landau, Marina
Lim, Ting Song
Woolery-Lloyd, Heather
Mariwalla, Kavita
Park, Je-Young
Yutskovskaya, Yana
Skin Quality – A Holistic 360° View: Consensus Results
title Skin Quality – A Holistic 360° View: Consensus Results
title_full Skin Quality – A Holistic 360° View: Consensus Results
title_fullStr Skin Quality – A Holistic 360° View: Consensus Results
title_full_unstemmed Skin Quality – A Holistic 360° View: Consensus Results
title_short Skin Quality – A Holistic 360° View: Consensus Results
title_sort skin quality – a holistic 360° view: consensus results
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8214518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34163203
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S309374
work_keys_str_mv AT goldiekate skinqualityaholistic360viewconsensusresults
AT kerschermartina skinqualityaholistic360viewconsensusresults
AT fabisabrinaguillen skinqualityaholistic360viewconsensusresults
AT hiranocyro skinqualityaholistic360viewconsensusresults
AT landaumarina skinqualityaholistic360viewconsensusresults
AT limtingsong skinqualityaholistic360viewconsensusresults
AT woolerylloydheather skinqualityaholistic360viewconsensusresults
AT mariwallakavita skinqualityaholistic360viewconsensusresults
AT parkjeyoung skinqualityaholistic360viewconsensusresults
AT yutskovskayayana skinqualityaholistic360viewconsensusresults