Cargando…
Analysis of Facility and Home Isolation Strategies in COVID 19 Pandemic: Evidences from Jodhpur, India
PURPOSE: Jodhpur administration directed its efforts to control and mitigate COVID 19 infection by implementing and monitoring facility isolation (FI) and home isolation (HI) measures. This study is conducted with a hypothesis that there is no difference in the quality of life and cost-effectiveness...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8214523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34163188 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S309909 |
_version_ | 1783710081106313216 |
---|---|
author | Bhardwaj, Pankaj Joshi, Nitin Kumar Gupta, Manoj Kumar Goel, Akhil Dhanesh Saurabh, Suman Charan, Jaykaran Rajpurohit, Prakash Ola, Suresh Singh, Pritam Bisht, Sunil Bishnoi, N R Manda, Balwant Singh, Kuldeep Misra, Sanjeev |
author_facet | Bhardwaj, Pankaj Joshi, Nitin Kumar Gupta, Manoj Kumar Goel, Akhil Dhanesh Saurabh, Suman Charan, Jaykaran Rajpurohit, Prakash Ola, Suresh Singh, Pritam Bisht, Sunil Bishnoi, N R Manda, Balwant Singh, Kuldeep Misra, Sanjeev |
author_sort | Bhardwaj, Pankaj |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Jodhpur administration directed its efforts to control and mitigate COVID 19 infection by implementing and monitoring facility isolation (FI) and home isolation (HI) measures. This study is conducted with a hypothesis that there is no difference in the quality of life and cost-effectiveness of mildly symptomatic or asymptomatic patients in HI and FI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A mixed-method study was conducted in Jodhpur in September 2020. The purposive sampling technique was used and data from 120 individuals admitted in HI and FI were collected. The information about the status and functioning of isolation facilities was collected from various sources. Multi-stakeholder interactions with 15 personnel engaged in managing isolation facilities were done. EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) which consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) was used to assess health-related quality of life. RESULTS: The strength of HI strategy is demonstrated by its ability to provide psychological and social support with minimal logistic requirements but the issue of sufficient household infrastructure, adequate family and societal support for implementing this strategy is of concern. The strength of FI strategy includes its ability to provide support to patients who have issues of sufficient household infrastructure, adequate family and societal support, but this strategy poses a threat of increasing human resource constraints and financial load on the health system. The respondents from HI obtained a mean EQ-5D index score of 0.90 and a mean VAS score of 85, whereas it was 0.80 and 78.5, respectively, for FI. The cost estimated for home isolation was Rs 549 (7.43 US $) per person, whereas it was Rs 2440 (33.02 US $) for facility Isolation. CONCLUSION: Though HI seems advantageous in terms of a better quality of life and cost-saving over FI, both the strategies are context-specific having their own trade-offs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8214523 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82145232021-06-22 Analysis of Facility and Home Isolation Strategies in COVID 19 Pandemic: Evidences from Jodhpur, India Bhardwaj, Pankaj Joshi, Nitin Kumar Gupta, Manoj Kumar Goel, Akhil Dhanesh Saurabh, Suman Charan, Jaykaran Rajpurohit, Prakash Ola, Suresh Singh, Pritam Bisht, Sunil Bishnoi, N R Manda, Balwant Singh, Kuldeep Misra, Sanjeev Infect Drug Resist Original Research PURPOSE: Jodhpur administration directed its efforts to control and mitigate COVID 19 infection by implementing and monitoring facility isolation (FI) and home isolation (HI) measures. This study is conducted with a hypothesis that there is no difference in the quality of life and cost-effectiveness of mildly symptomatic or asymptomatic patients in HI and FI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A mixed-method study was conducted in Jodhpur in September 2020. The purposive sampling technique was used and data from 120 individuals admitted in HI and FI were collected. The information about the status and functioning of isolation facilities was collected from various sources. Multi-stakeholder interactions with 15 personnel engaged in managing isolation facilities were done. EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) which consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) was used to assess health-related quality of life. RESULTS: The strength of HI strategy is demonstrated by its ability to provide psychological and social support with minimal logistic requirements but the issue of sufficient household infrastructure, adequate family and societal support for implementing this strategy is of concern. The strength of FI strategy includes its ability to provide support to patients who have issues of sufficient household infrastructure, adequate family and societal support, but this strategy poses a threat of increasing human resource constraints and financial load on the health system. The respondents from HI obtained a mean EQ-5D index score of 0.90 and a mean VAS score of 85, whereas it was 0.80 and 78.5, respectively, for FI. The cost estimated for home isolation was Rs 549 (7.43 US $) per person, whereas it was Rs 2440 (33.02 US $) for facility Isolation. CONCLUSION: Though HI seems advantageous in terms of a better quality of life and cost-saving over FI, both the strategies are context-specific having their own trade-offs. Dove 2021-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8214523/ /pubmed/34163188 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S309909 Text en © 2021 Bhardwaj et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Bhardwaj, Pankaj Joshi, Nitin Kumar Gupta, Manoj Kumar Goel, Akhil Dhanesh Saurabh, Suman Charan, Jaykaran Rajpurohit, Prakash Ola, Suresh Singh, Pritam Bisht, Sunil Bishnoi, N R Manda, Balwant Singh, Kuldeep Misra, Sanjeev Analysis of Facility and Home Isolation Strategies in COVID 19 Pandemic: Evidences from Jodhpur, India |
title | Analysis of Facility and Home Isolation Strategies in COVID 19 Pandemic: Evidences from Jodhpur, India |
title_full | Analysis of Facility and Home Isolation Strategies in COVID 19 Pandemic: Evidences from Jodhpur, India |
title_fullStr | Analysis of Facility and Home Isolation Strategies in COVID 19 Pandemic: Evidences from Jodhpur, India |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of Facility and Home Isolation Strategies in COVID 19 Pandemic: Evidences from Jodhpur, India |
title_short | Analysis of Facility and Home Isolation Strategies in COVID 19 Pandemic: Evidences from Jodhpur, India |
title_sort | analysis of facility and home isolation strategies in covid 19 pandemic: evidences from jodhpur, india |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8214523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34163188 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S309909 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bhardwajpankaj analysisoffacilityandhomeisolationstrategiesincovid19pandemicevidencesfromjodhpurindia AT joshinitinkumar analysisoffacilityandhomeisolationstrategiesincovid19pandemicevidencesfromjodhpurindia AT guptamanojkumar analysisoffacilityandhomeisolationstrategiesincovid19pandemicevidencesfromjodhpurindia AT goelakhildhanesh analysisoffacilityandhomeisolationstrategiesincovid19pandemicevidencesfromjodhpurindia AT saurabhsuman analysisoffacilityandhomeisolationstrategiesincovid19pandemicevidencesfromjodhpurindia AT charanjaykaran analysisoffacilityandhomeisolationstrategiesincovid19pandemicevidencesfromjodhpurindia AT rajpurohitprakash analysisoffacilityandhomeisolationstrategiesincovid19pandemicevidencesfromjodhpurindia AT olasuresh analysisoffacilityandhomeisolationstrategiesincovid19pandemicevidencesfromjodhpurindia AT singhpritam analysisoffacilityandhomeisolationstrategiesincovid19pandemicevidencesfromjodhpurindia AT bishtsunil analysisoffacilityandhomeisolationstrategiesincovid19pandemicevidencesfromjodhpurindia AT bishnoinr analysisoffacilityandhomeisolationstrategiesincovid19pandemicevidencesfromjodhpurindia AT mandabalwant analysisoffacilityandhomeisolationstrategiesincovid19pandemicevidencesfromjodhpurindia AT singhkuldeep analysisoffacilityandhomeisolationstrategiesincovid19pandemicevidencesfromjodhpurindia AT misrasanjeev analysisoffacilityandhomeisolationstrategiesincovid19pandemicevidencesfromjodhpurindia |