Cargando…

Analysis of Facility and Home Isolation Strategies in COVID 19 Pandemic: Evidences from Jodhpur, India

PURPOSE: Jodhpur administration directed its efforts to control and mitigate COVID 19 infection by implementing and monitoring facility isolation (FI) and home isolation (HI) measures. This study is conducted with a hypothesis that there is no difference in the quality of life and cost-effectiveness...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhardwaj, Pankaj, Joshi, Nitin Kumar, Gupta, Manoj Kumar, Goel, Akhil Dhanesh, Saurabh, Suman, Charan, Jaykaran, Rajpurohit, Prakash, Ola, Suresh, Singh, Pritam, Bisht, Sunil, Bishnoi, N R, Manda, Balwant, Singh, Kuldeep, Misra, Sanjeev
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8214523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34163188
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S309909
_version_ 1783710081106313216
author Bhardwaj, Pankaj
Joshi, Nitin Kumar
Gupta, Manoj Kumar
Goel, Akhil Dhanesh
Saurabh, Suman
Charan, Jaykaran
Rajpurohit, Prakash
Ola, Suresh
Singh, Pritam
Bisht, Sunil
Bishnoi, N R
Manda, Balwant
Singh, Kuldeep
Misra, Sanjeev
author_facet Bhardwaj, Pankaj
Joshi, Nitin Kumar
Gupta, Manoj Kumar
Goel, Akhil Dhanesh
Saurabh, Suman
Charan, Jaykaran
Rajpurohit, Prakash
Ola, Suresh
Singh, Pritam
Bisht, Sunil
Bishnoi, N R
Manda, Balwant
Singh, Kuldeep
Misra, Sanjeev
author_sort Bhardwaj, Pankaj
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Jodhpur administration directed its efforts to control and mitigate COVID 19 infection by implementing and monitoring facility isolation (FI) and home isolation (HI) measures. This study is conducted with a hypothesis that there is no difference in the quality of life and cost-effectiveness of mildly symptomatic or asymptomatic patients in HI and FI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A mixed-method study was conducted in Jodhpur in September 2020. The purposive sampling technique was used and data from 120 individuals admitted in HI and FI were collected. The information about the status and functioning of isolation facilities was collected from various sources. Multi-stakeholder interactions with 15 personnel engaged in managing isolation facilities were done. EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) which consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) was used to assess health-related quality of life. RESULTS: The strength of HI strategy is demonstrated by its ability to provide psychological and social support with minimal logistic requirements but the issue of sufficient household infrastructure, adequate family and societal support for implementing this strategy is of concern. The strength of FI strategy includes its ability to provide support to patients who have issues of sufficient household infrastructure, adequate family and societal support, but this strategy poses a threat of increasing human resource constraints and financial load on the health system. The respondents from HI obtained a mean EQ-5D index score of 0.90 and a mean VAS score of 85, whereas it was 0.80 and 78.5, respectively, for FI. The cost estimated for home isolation was Rs 549 (7.43 US $) per person, whereas it was Rs 2440 (33.02 US $) for facility Isolation. CONCLUSION: Though HI seems advantageous in terms of a better quality of life and cost-saving over FI, both the strategies are context-specific having their own trade-offs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8214523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82145232021-06-22 Analysis of Facility and Home Isolation Strategies in COVID 19 Pandemic: Evidences from Jodhpur, India Bhardwaj, Pankaj Joshi, Nitin Kumar Gupta, Manoj Kumar Goel, Akhil Dhanesh Saurabh, Suman Charan, Jaykaran Rajpurohit, Prakash Ola, Suresh Singh, Pritam Bisht, Sunil Bishnoi, N R Manda, Balwant Singh, Kuldeep Misra, Sanjeev Infect Drug Resist Original Research PURPOSE: Jodhpur administration directed its efforts to control and mitigate COVID 19 infection by implementing and monitoring facility isolation (FI) and home isolation (HI) measures. This study is conducted with a hypothesis that there is no difference in the quality of life and cost-effectiveness of mildly symptomatic or asymptomatic patients in HI and FI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A mixed-method study was conducted in Jodhpur in September 2020. The purposive sampling technique was used and data from 120 individuals admitted in HI and FI were collected. The information about the status and functioning of isolation facilities was collected from various sources. Multi-stakeholder interactions with 15 personnel engaged in managing isolation facilities were done. EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) which consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) was used to assess health-related quality of life. RESULTS: The strength of HI strategy is demonstrated by its ability to provide psychological and social support with minimal logistic requirements but the issue of sufficient household infrastructure, adequate family and societal support for implementing this strategy is of concern. The strength of FI strategy includes its ability to provide support to patients who have issues of sufficient household infrastructure, adequate family and societal support, but this strategy poses a threat of increasing human resource constraints and financial load on the health system. The respondents from HI obtained a mean EQ-5D index score of 0.90 and a mean VAS score of 85, whereas it was 0.80 and 78.5, respectively, for FI. The cost estimated for home isolation was Rs 549 (7.43 US $) per person, whereas it was Rs 2440 (33.02 US $) for facility Isolation. CONCLUSION: Though HI seems advantageous in terms of a better quality of life and cost-saving over FI, both the strategies are context-specific having their own trade-offs. Dove 2021-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8214523/ /pubmed/34163188 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S309909 Text en © 2021 Bhardwaj et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Bhardwaj, Pankaj
Joshi, Nitin Kumar
Gupta, Manoj Kumar
Goel, Akhil Dhanesh
Saurabh, Suman
Charan, Jaykaran
Rajpurohit, Prakash
Ola, Suresh
Singh, Pritam
Bisht, Sunil
Bishnoi, N R
Manda, Balwant
Singh, Kuldeep
Misra, Sanjeev
Analysis of Facility and Home Isolation Strategies in COVID 19 Pandemic: Evidences from Jodhpur, India
title Analysis of Facility and Home Isolation Strategies in COVID 19 Pandemic: Evidences from Jodhpur, India
title_full Analysis of Facility and Home Isolation Strategies in COVID 19 Pandemic: Evidences from Jodhpur, India
title_fullStr Analysis of Facility and Home Isolation Strategies in COVID 19 Pandemic: Evidences from Jodhpur, India
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Facility and Home Isolation Strategies in COVID 19 Pandemic: Evidences from Jodhpur, India
title_short Analysis of Facility and Home Isolation Strategies in COVID 19 Pandemic: Evidences from Jodhpur, India
title_sort analysis of facility and home isolation strategies in covid 19 pandemic: evidences from jodhpur, india
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8214523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34163188
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S309909
work_keys_str_mv AT bhardwajpankaj analysisoffacilityandhomeisolationstrategiesincovid19pandemicevidencesfromjodhpurindia
AT joshinitinkumar analysisoffacilityandhomeisolationstrategiesincovid19pandemicevidencesfromjodhpurindia
AT guptamanojkumar analysisoffacilityandhomeisolationstrategiesincovid19pandemicevidencesfromjodhpurindia
AT goelakhildhanesh analysisoffacilityandhomeisolationstrategiesincovid19pandemicevidencesfromjodhpurindia
AT saurabhsuman analysisoffacilityandhomeisolationstrategiesincovid19pandemicevidencesfromjodhpurindia
AT charanjaykaran analysisoffacilityandhomeisolationstrategiesincovid19pandemicevidencesfromjodhpurindia
AT rajpurohitprakash analysisoffacilityandhomeisolationstrategiesincovid19pandemicevidencesfromjodhpurindia
AT olasuresh analysisoffacilityandhomeisolationstrategiesincovid19pandemicevidencesfromjodhpurindia
AT singhpritam analysisoffacilityandhomeisolationstrategiesincovid19pandemicevidencesfromjodhpurindia
AT bishtsunil analysisoffacilityandhomeisolationstrategiesincovid19pandemicevidencesfromjodhpurindia
AT bishnoinr analysisoffacilityandhomeisolationstrategiesincovid19pandemicevidencesfromjodhpurindia
AT mandabalwant analysisoffacilityandhomeisolationstrategiesincovid19pandemicevidencesfromjodhpurindia
AT singhkuldeep analysisoffacilityandhomeisolationstrategiesincovid19pandemicevidencesfromjodhpurindia
AT misrasanjeev analysisoffacilityandhomeisolationstrategiesincovid19pandemicevidencesfromjodhpurindia