Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of adding Sativex® spray to spasticity care in Belgium: using bootstrapping instead of Monte Carlo simulation for probabilistic sensitivity analyses

BACKGROUND: Uncertainty in model-based cost-utility analyses is commonly assessed in a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Model parameters are implemented as distributions and values are sampled from these distributions in a Monte Carlo simulation. Bootstrapping is an alternative method that requir...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oppe, Mark, Ortín-Sulbarán, Daniela, Vila Silván, Carlos, Estévez-Carrillo, Anabel, Ramos-Goñi, Juan M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8214588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33880663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-021-01285-1
_version_ 1783710095879700480
author Oppe, Mark
Ortín-Sulbarán, Daniela
Vila Silván, Carlos
Estévez-Carrillo, Anabel
Ramos-Goñi, Juan M.
author_facet Oppe, Mark
Ortín-Sulbarán, Daniela
Vila Silván, Carlos
Estévez-Carrillo, Anabel
Ramos-Goñi, Juan M.
author_sort Oppe, Mark
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Uncertainty in model-based cost-utility analyses is commonly assessed in a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Model parameters are implemented as distributions and values are sampled from these distributions in a Monte Carlo simulation. Bootstrapping is an alternative method that requires fewer assumptions and incorporates correlations between model parameters. METHODS: A Markov model-based cost–utility analysis comparing oromucosal spray containing delta-9-tetrahidrocannabinol + cannabidiol (Sativex®, nabiximols) plus standard care versus standard spasticity care alone in the management of multiple sclerosis spasticity was performed over a 5-year time horizon from the Belgian healthcare payer perspective. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis was implemented using a bootstrap approach to ensure that the correlations present in the source clinical trial data were incorporated in the uncertainty estimates. RESULTS: Adding Sativex® spray to standard care was found to dominate standard spasticity care alone, with cost savings of €6,068 and a quality-adjusted life year gain of 0.145 per patient over the 5-year analysis. The probability of dominance increased from 29% in the first year to 94% in the fifth year, with the probability of QALY gains in excess of 99% for all years considered. CONCLUSIONS: Adding Sativex® spray to spasticity care was found to dominate standard spasticity care alone in the Belgian healthcare setting. This study showed the use of bootstrapping techniques in a Markov model probabilistic sensitivity analysis instead of Monte Carlo simulations. Bootstrapping avoided the need to make distributional assumptions and allowed the incorporation of correlating structures present in the original clinical trial data in the uncertainty assessment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10198-021-01285-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8214588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82145882021-07-01 Cost-effectiveness of adding Sativex® spray to spasticity care in Belgium: using bootstrapping instead of Monte Carlo simulation for probabilistic sensitivity analyses Oppe, Mark Ortín-Sulbarán, Daniela Vila Silván, Carlos Estévez-Carrillo, Anabel Ramos-Goñi, Juan M. Eur J Health Econ Original Paper BACKGROUND: Uncertainty in model-based cost-utility analyses is commonly assessed in a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Model parameters are implemented as distributions and values are sampled from these distributions in a Monte Carlo simulation. Bootstrapping is an alternative method that requires fewer assumptions and incorporates correlations between model parameters. METHODS: A Markov model-based cost–utility analysis comparing oromucosal spray containing delta-9-tetrahidrocannabinol + cannabidiol (Sativex®, nabiximols) plus standard care versus standard spasticity care alone in the management of multiple sclerosis spasticity was performed over a 5-year time horizon from the Belgian healthcare payer perspective. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis was implemented using a bootstrap approach to ensure that the correlations present in the source clinical trial data were incorporated in the uncertainty estimates. RESULTS: Adding Sativex® spray to standard care was found to dominate standard spasticity care alone, with cost savings of €6,068 and a quality-adjusted life year gain of 0.145 per patient over the 5-year analysis. The probability of dominance increased from 29% in the first year to 94% in the fifth year, with the probability of QALY gains in excess of 99% for all years considered. CONCLUSIONS: Adding Sativex® spray to spasticity care was found to dominate standard spasticity care alone in the Belgian healthcare setting. This study showed the use of bootstrapping techniques in a Markov model probabilistic sensitivity analysis instead of Monte Carlo simulations. Bootstrapping avoided the need to make distributional assumptions and allowed the incorporation of correlating structures present in the original clinical trial data in the uncertainty assessment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10198-021-01285-1. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-04-20 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8214588/ /pubmed/33880663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-021-01285-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Oppe, Mark
Ortín-Sulbarán, Daniela
Vila Silván, Carlos
Estévez-Carrillo, Anabel
Ramos-Goñi, Juan M.
Cost-effectiveness of adding Sativex® spray to spasticity care in Belgium: using bootstrapping instead of Monte Carlo simulation for probabilistic sensitivity analyses
title Cost-effectiveness of adding Sativex® spray to spasticity care in Belgium: using bootstrapping instead of Monte Carlo simulation for probabilistic sensitivity analyses
title_full Cost-effectiveness of adding Sativex® spray to spasticity care in Belgium: using bootstrapping instead of Monte Carlo simulation for probabilistic sensitivity analyses
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of adding Sativex® spray to spasticity care in Belgium: using bootstrapping instead of Monte Carlo simulation for probabilistic sensitivity analyses
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of adding Sativex® spray to spasticity care in Belgium: using bootstrapping instead of Monte Carlo simulation for probabilistic sensitivity analyses
title_short Cost-effectiveness of adding Sativex® spray to spasticity care in Belgium: using bootstrapping instead of Monte Carlo simulation for probabilistic sensitivity analyses
title_sort cost-effectiveness of adding sativex® spray to spasticity care in belgium: using bootstrapping instead of monte carlo simulation for probabilistic sensitivity analyses
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8214588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33880663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-021-01285-1
work_keys_str_mv AT oppemark costeffectivenessofaddingsativexspraytospasticitycareinbelgiumusingbootstrappinginsteadofmontecarlosimulationforprobabilisticsensitivityanalyses
AT ortinsulbarandaniela costeffectivenessofaddingsativexspraytospasticitycareinbelgiumusingbootstrappinginsteadofmontecarlosimulationforprobabilisticsensitivityanalyses
AT vilasilvancarlos costeffectivenessofaddingsativexspraytospasticitycareinbelgiumusingbootstrappinginsteadofmontecarlosimulationforprobabilisticsensitivityanalyses
AT estevezcarrilloanabel costeffectivenessofaddingsativexspraytospasticitycareinbelgiumusingbootstrappinginsteadofmontecarlosimulationforprobabilisticsensitivityanalyses
AT ramosgonijuanm costeffectivenessofaddingsativexspraytospasticitycareinbelgiumusingbootstrappinginsteadofmontecarlosimulationforprobabilisticsensitivityanalyses