Cargando…
Evaluation of M-Health Applications Use in Epilepsy: A Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: Epilepsy is a neurological disorder characterized by seizures and recurrent attacks. Self-management leads to seizure control and maximizes the quality of life in epileptic patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of applications available in the epileptic google p...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8214595/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34178793 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v50i3.5586 |
_version_ | 1783710097596219392 |
---|---|
author | MOHAMMADZADEH, Niloofar KHENARINEZHAD, Sahar GHAZANFARISAVADKOOHI, Ehsan SAFARI, Mohammad Saleh PAHLEVANYNEJAD, Shahrbanoo |
author_facet | MOHAMMADZADEH, Niloofar KHENARINEZHAD, Sahar GHAZANFARISAVADKOOHI, Ehsan SAFARI, Mohammad Saleh PAHLEVANYNEJAD, Shahrbanoo |
author_sort | MOHAMMADZADEH, Niloofar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Epilepsy is a neurological disorder characterized by seizures and recurrent attacks. Self-management leads to seizure control and maximizes the quality of life in epileptic patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of applications available in the epileptic google play store based on the rating features of MARS (Mobile Applications Rating Scale). METHODS: The search was conducted systematically using the keywords “epilepsy”, “seizure”, “mobile health” at the Android google play store. Data were extracted and analyzed from Feb 2018 to Apr 2019. RESULTS: Accordingly, 45 apps were identified potentially relevant of which 20 met inclusion criteria. Twenty-five apps were excluded because they were unrelated to epilepsy self-management, or not Development for people with epilepsy, not in English language or were not free and available. The total mean MARS score was 3.21 out of 5, and more than half of apps (17, 85%) had a minimum acceptability score of 3.0. The mean of apps’ items were 3.27 in Engagement, 3.96 in function, 3.30 in Aesthetics, 2.96 in Information and 2.73 in subjective quality items. CONCLUSION: Few apps meet prespecified criteria for quality, content, and functionality for epilepsy self-management. Despite the rapid evolution of self-management apps, lack of validation studies is a significant concern that limits the clinical value of these apps. Moreover, having a guideline and benchmarking in the field of mobile application development, in epilepsy management, can help analyze the content of established applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8214595 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82145952021-06-25 Evaluation of M-Health Applications Use in Epilepsy: A Systematic Review MOHAMMADZADEH, Niloofar KHENARINEZHAD, Sahar GHAZANFARISAVADKOOHI, Ehsan SAFARI, Mohammad Saleh PAHLEVANYNEJAD, Shahrbanoo Iran J Public Health Review Article BACKGROUND: Epilepsy is a neurological disorder characterized by seizures and recurrent attacks. Self-management leads to seizure control and maximizes the quality of life in epileptic patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of applications available in the epileptic google play store based on the rating features of MARS (Mobile Applications Rating Scale). METHODS: The search was conducted systematically using the keywords “epilepsy”, “seizure”, “mobile health” at the Android google play store. Data were extracted and analyzed from Feb 2018 to Apr 2019. RESULTS: Accordingly, 45 apps were identified potentially relevant of which 20 met inclusion criteria. Twenty-five apps were excluded because they were unrelated to epilepsy self-management, or not Development for people with epilepsy, not in English language or were not free and available. The total mean MARS score was 3.21 out of 5, and more than half of apps (17, 85%) had a minimum acceptability score of 3.0. The mean of apps’ items were 3.27 in Engagement, 3.96 in function, 3.30 in Aesthetics, 2.96 in Information and 2.73 in subjective quality items. CONCLUSION: Few apps meet prespecified criteria for quality, content, and functionality for epilepsy self-management. Despite the rapid evolution of self-management apps, lack of validation studies is a significant concern that limits the clinical value of these apps. Moreover, having a guideline and benchmarking in the field of mobile application development, in epilepsy management, can help analyze the content of established applications. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8214595/ /pubmed/34178793 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v50i3.5586 Text en Copyright © 2021 Mohammadzadeh et al. Published by Tehran University of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article MOHAMMADZADEH, Niloofar KHENARINEZHAD, Sahar GHAZANFARISAVADKOOHI, Ehsan SAFARI, Mohammad Saleh PAHLEVANYNEJAD, Shahrbanoo Evaluation of M-Health Applications Use in Epilepsy: A Systematic Review |
title | Evaluation of M-Health Applications Use in Epilepsy: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Evaluation of M-Health Applications Use in Epilepsy: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of M-Health Applications Use in Epilepsy: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of M-Health Applications Use in Epilepsy: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Evaluation of M-Health Applications Use in Epilepsy: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | evaluation of m-health applications use in epilepsy: a systematic review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8214595/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34178793 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v50i3.5586 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mohammadzadehniloofar evaluationofmhealthapplicationsuseinepilepsyasystematicreview AT khenarinezhadsahar evaluationofmhealthapplicationsuseinepilepsyasystematicreview AT ghazanfarisavadkoohiehsan evaluationofmhealthapplicationsuseinepilepsyasystematicreview AT safarimohammadsaleh evaluationofmhealthapplicationsuseinepilepsyasystematicreview AT pahlevanynejadshahrbanoo evaluationofmhealthapplicationsuseinepilepsyasystematicreview |