Cargando…

Evaluation of M-Health Applications Use in Epilepsy: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy is a neurological disorder characterized by seizures and recurrent attacks. Self-management leads to seizure control and maximizes the quality of life in epileptic patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of applications available in the epileptic google p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: MOHAMMADZADEH, Niloofar, KHENARINEZHAD, Sahar, GHAZANFARISAVADKOOHI, Ehsan, SAFARI, Mohammad Saleh, PAHLEVANYNEJAD, Shahrbanoo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8214595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34178793
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v50i3.5586
_version_ 1783710097596219392
author MOHAMMADZADEH, Niloofar
KHENARINEZHAD, Sahar
GHAZANFARISAVADKOOHI, Ehsan
SAFARI, Mohammad Saleh
PAHLEVANYNEJAD, Shahrbanoo
author_facet MOHAMMADZADEH, Niloofar
KHENARINEZHAD, Sahar
GHAZANFARISAVADKOOHI, Ehsan
SAFARI, Mohammad Saleh
PAHLEVANYNEJAD, Shahrbanoo
author_sort MOHAMMADZADEH, Niloofar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Epilepsy is a neurological disorder characterized by seizures and recurrent attacks. Self-management leads to seizure control and maximizes the quality of life in epileptic patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of applications available in the epileptic google play store based on the rating features of MARS (Mobile Applications Rating Scale). METHODS: The search was conducted systematically using the keywords “epilepsy”, “seizure”, “mobile health” at the Android google play store. Data were extracted and analyzed from Feb 2018 to Apr 2019. RESULTS: Accordingly, 45 apps were identified potentially relevant of which 20 met inclusion criteria. Twenty-five apps were excluded because they were unrelated to epilepsy self-management, or not Development for people with epilepsy, not in English language or were not free and available. The total mean MARS score was 3.21 out of 5, and more than half of apps (17, 85%) had a minimum acceptability score of 3.0. The mean of apps’ items were 3.27 in Engagement, 3.96 in function, 3.30 in Aesthetics, 2.96 in Information and 2.73 in subjective quality items. CONCLUSION: Few apps meet prespecified criteria for quality, content, and functionality for epilepsy self-management. Despite the rapid evolution of self-management apps, lack of validation studies is a significant concern that limits the clinical value of these apps. Moreover, having a guideline and benchmarking in the field of mobile application development, in epilepsy management, can help analyze the content of established applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8214595
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82145952021-06-25 Evaluation of M-Health Applications Use in Epilepsy: A Systematic Review MOHAMMADZADEH, Niloofar KHENARINEZHAD, Sahar GHAZANFARISAVADKOOHI, Ehsan SAFARI, Mohammad Saleh PAHLEVANYNEJAD, Shahrbanoo Iran J Public Health Review Article BACKGROUND: Epilepsy is a neurological disorder characterized by seizures and recurrent attacks. Self-management leads to seizure control and maximizes the quality of life in epileptic patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of applications available in the epileptic google play store based on the rating features of MARS (Mobile Applications Rating Scale). METHODS: The search was conducted systematically using the keywords “epilepsy”, “seizure”, “mobile health” at the Android google play store. Data were extracted and analyzed from Feb 2018 to Apr 2019. RESULTS: Accordingly, 45 apps were identified potentially relevant of which 20 met inclusion criteria. Twenty-five apps were excluded because they were unrelated to epilepsy self-management, or not Development for people with epilepsy, not in English language or were not free and available. The total mean MARS score was 3.21 out of 5, and more than half of apps (17, 85%) had a minimum acceptability score of 3.0. The mean of apps’ items were 3.27 in Engagement, 3.96 in function, 3.30 in Aesthetics, 2.96 in Information and 2.73 in subjective quality items. CONCLUSION: Few apps meet prespecified criteria for quality, content, and functionality for epilepsy self-management. Despite the rapid evolution of self-management apps, lack of validation studies is a significant concern that limits the clinical value of these apps. Moreover, having a guideline and benchmarking in the field of mobile application development, in epilepsy management, can help analyze the content of established applications. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8214595/ /pubmed/34178793 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v50i3.5586 Text en Copyright © 2021 Mohammadzadeh et al. Published by Tehran University of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
MOHAMMADZADEH, Niloofar
KHENARINEZHAD, Sahar
GHAZANFARISAVADKOOHI, Ehsan
SAFARI, Mohammad Saleh
PAHLEVANYNEJAD, Shahrbanoo
Evaluation of M-Health Applications Use in Epilepsy: A Systematic Review
title Evaluation of M-Health Applications Use in Epilepsy: A Systematic Review
title_full Evaluation of M-Health Applications Use in Epilepsy: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Evaluation of M-Health Applications Use in Epilepsy: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of M-Health Applications Use in Epilepsy: A Systematic Review
title_short Evaluation of M-Health Applications Use in Epilepsy: A Systematic Review
title_sort evaluation of m-health applications use in epilepsy: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8214595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34178793
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v50i3.5586
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadzadehniloofar evaluationofmhealthapplicationsuseinepilepsyasystematicreview
AT khenarinezhadsahar evaluationofmhealthapplicationsuseinepilepsyasystematicreview
AT ghazanfarisavadkoohiehsan evaluationofmhealthapplicationsuseinepilepsyasystematicreview
AT safarimohammadsaleh evaluationofmhealthapplicationsuseinepilepsyasystematicreview
AT pahlevanynejadshahrbanoo evaluationofmhealthapplicationsuseinepilepsyasystematicreview