Cargando…

Psychological resilience during COVID-19: a meta-review protocol

INTRODUCTION: The global COVID-19 pandemic continues to have wide-ranging implications for health, including psychological well-being. A growing corpus of research reviews has emerged on the topic of psychological resilience in the context of the pandemic. However, this body of work has not been sys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seaborn, Katie, Chignell, Mark, Gwizdka, Jacek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8214992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34145023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051417
_version_ 1783710160065134592
author Seaborn, Katie
Chignell, Mark
Gwizdka, Jacek
author_facet Seaborn, Katie
Chignell, Mark
Gwizdka, Jacek
author_sort Seaborn, Katie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The global COVID-19 pandemic continues to have wide-ranging implications for health, including psychological well-being. A growing corpus of research reviews has emerged on the topic of psychological resilience in the context of the pandemic. However, this body of work has not been systematically reviewed for its quality, nor with respect to findings on the effectiveness of tools and strategies for psychological resilience. To this end, a meta-review protocol is proposed with the following objectives: (1) identify review work on the topic of psychological resilience during COVID-19; (2) assess the quality of this review work using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews; (3) assess the risk of bias in this work; (4) generate a narrative summary of the key points, strengths and weaknesses; (5) identify the psychological resilience strategies that have been reviewed; (6) identify how these strategies have been evaluated for their effectiveness; (7) identify what outcomes were measured and (8) summarise the findings on strategies for psychological resilience so far, providing recommendations, if possible. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic meta-review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews for Protocols and Joanna Briggs Institute umbrella review guidelines. Electronic searches of general databases, especially Web of Science, Scopus and PubMed, will be conducted. Only results from January 2020 onwards will be considered, coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic. Only results in English will be included. Descriptive statistics, thematic analysis and narrative summaries describing the nature of the reviewed work and evaluation of psychological resilience strategies will be carried out. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not needed for systematic review protocols. The results of the meta-review will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal. The raw and summarised data will be shared in the journal or other open venues. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021235288.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8214992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82149922021-06-28 Psychological resilience during COVID-19: a meta-review protocol Seaborn, Katie Chignell, Mark Gwizdka, Jacek BMJ Open Public Health INTRODUCTION: The global COVID-19 pandemic continues to have wide-ranging implications for health, including psychological well-being. A growing corpus of research reviews has emerged on the topic of psychological resilience in the context of the pandemic. However, this body of work has not been systematically reviewed for its quality, nor with respect to findings on the effectiveness of tools and strategies for psychological resilience. To this end, a meta-review protocol is proposed with the following objectives: (1) identify review work on the topic of psychological resilience during COVID-19; (2) assess the quality of this review work using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews; (3) assess the risk of bias in this work; (4) generate a narrative summary of the key points, strengths and weaknesses; (5) identify the psychological resilience strategies that have been reviewed; (6) identify how these strategies have been evaluated for their effectiveness; (7) identify what outcomes were measured and (8) summarise the findings on strategies for psychological resilience so far, providing recommendations, if possible. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic meta-review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews for Protocols and Joanna Briggs Institute umbrella review guidelines. Electronic searches of general databases, especially Web of Science, Scopus and PubMed, will be conducted. Only results from January 2020 onwards will be considered, coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic. Only results in English will be included. Descriptive statistics, thematic analysis and narrative summaries describing the nature of the reviewed work and evaluation of psychological resilience strategies will be carried out. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not needed for systematic review protocols. The results of the meta-review will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal. The raw and summarised data will be shared in the journal or other open venues. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021235288. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8214992/ /pubmed/34145023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051417 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Public Health
Seaborn, Katie
Chignell, Mark
Gwizdka, Jacek
Psychological resilience during COVID-19: a meta-review protocol
title Psychological resilience during COVID-19: a meta-review protocol
title_full Psychological resilience during COVID-19: a meta-review protocol
title_fullStr Psychological resilience during COVID-19: a meta-review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Psychological resilience during COVID-19: a meta-review protocol
title_short Psychological resilience during COVID-19: a meta-review protocol
title_sort psychological resilience during covid-19: a meta-review protocol
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8214992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34145023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051417
work_keys_str_mv AT seabornkatie psychologicalresilienceduringcovid19ametareviewprotocol
AT chignellmark psychologicalresilienceduringcovid19ametareviewprotocol
AT gwizdkajacek psychologicalresilienceduringcovid19ametareviewprotocol