Cargando…
Development of Abstract Word Knowledge
The development of children’s word knowledge is an important testing ground for the embodied account of word meaning, which proposes that word meanings are grounded in sensorimotor systems. Acquisition of abstract words, in particular, is a noted challenge for strong accounts of embodiment. We exami...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8215159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34163413 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686478 |
_version_ | 1783710191898853376 |
---|---|
author | Reggin, Lorraine D. Muraki, Emiko J. Pexman, Penny M. |
author_facet | Reggin, Lorraine D. Muraki, Emiko J. Pexman, Penny M. |
author_sort | Reggin, Lorraine D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The development of children’s word knowledge is an important testing ground for the embodied account of word meaning, which proposes that word meanings are grounded in sensorimotor systems. Acquisition of abstract words, in particular, is a noted challenge for strong accounts of embodiment. We examined acquisition of abstract word meanings, using data on development of vocabulary knowledge from early school to University ages. We tested two specific proposals for how abstract words are learned: the affective embodiment account, that emotional experience is key to learning abstract word meanings, and the learning through language proposal, that abstract words are acquired through language experience. We found support for the affective embodiment account: word valence, interoception, and mouth action all facilitated abstract word acquisition more than concrete word acquisition. We tested the learning through language proposal by investigating whether words that appear in more diverse linguistic contexts are earlier acquired. Results showed that contextual diversity facilitated vocabulary acquisition, but did so for both abstract and concrete words. Our results provide evidence that emotion and sensorimotor systems are important to children’s acquisition of abstract words, but there is still considerable variance to be accounted for by other factors. We offer suggestions for future research to examine the acquisition of abstract vocabulary. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8215159 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82151592021-06-22 Development of Abstract Word Knowledge Reggin, Lorraine D. Muraki, Emiko J. Pexman, Penny M. Front Psychol Psychology The development of children’s word knowledge is an important testing ground for the embodied account of word meaning, which proposes that word meanings are grounded in sensorimotor systems. Acquisition of abstract words, in particular, is a noted challenge for strong accounts of embodiment. We examined acquisition of abstract word meanings, using data on development of vocabulary knowledge from early school to University ages. We tested two specific proposals for how abstract words are learned: the affective embodiment account, that emotional experience is key to learning abstract word meanings, and the learning through language proposal, that abstract words are acquired through language experience. We found support for the affective embodiment account: word valence, interoception, and mouth action all facilitated abstract word acquisition more than concrete word acquisition. We tested the learning through language proposal by investigating whether words that appear in more diverse linguistic contexts are earlier acquired. Results showed that contextual diversity facilitated vocabulary acquisition, but did so for both abstract and concrete words. Our results provide evidence that emotion and sensorimotor systems are important to children’s acquisition of abstract words, but there is still considerable variance to be accounted for by other factors. We offer suggestions for future research to examine the acquisition of abstract vocabulary. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8215159/ /pubmed/34163413 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686478 Text en Copyright © 2021 Reggin, Muraki and Pexman. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Reggin, Lorraine D. Muraki, Emiko J. Pexman, Penny M. Development of Abstract Word Knowledge |
title | Development of Abstract Word Knowledge |
title_full | Development of Abstract Word Knowledge |
title_fullStr | Development of Abstract Word Knowledge |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of Abstract Word Knowledge |
title_short | Development of Abstract Word Knowledge |
title_sort | development of abstract word knowledge |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8215159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34163413 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686478 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT regginlorrained developmentofabstractwordknowledge AT murakiemikoj developmentofabstractwordknowledge AT pexmanpennym developmentofabstractwordknowledge |