Cargando…
Reversing Post-Infectious Epigenetic-Mediated Immune Suppression
The immune response must balance the pro-inflammatory, cell-mediated cytotoxicity with the anti-inflammatory and wound repair response. Epigenetic mechanisms mediate this balance and limit host immunity from inducing exuberant collateral damage to host tissue after severe and chronic infections. How...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8215363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34163486 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.688132 |
_version_ | 1783710236788391936 |
---|---|
author | Abhimanyu, Ontiveros, Carlos O. Guerra-Resendez, Rosa S. Nishiguchi, Tomoki Ladki, Malik Hilton, Isaac B. Schlesinger, Larry S. DiNardo, Andrew R. |
author_facet | Abhimanyu, Ontiveros, Carlos O. Guerra-Resendez, Rosa S. Nishiguchi, Tomoki Ladki, Malik Hilton, Isaac B. Schlesinger, Larry S. DiNardo, Andrew R. |
author_sort | Abhimanyu, |
collection | PubMed |
description | The immune response must balance the pro-inflammatory, cell-mediated cytotoxicity with the anti-inflammatory and wound repair response. Epigenetic mechanisms mediate this balance and limit host immunity from inducing exuberant collateral damage to host tissue after severe and chronic infections. However, following treatment for these infections, including sepsis, pneumonia, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, HIV, tuberculosis (TB) or schistosomiasis, detrimental epigenetic scars persist, and result in long-lasting immune suppression. This is hypothesized to be one of the contributing mechanisms explaining why survivors of infection have increased all-cause mortality and increased rates of unrelated secondary infections. The mechanisms that induce epigenetic-mediated immune suppression have been demonstrated in-vitro and in animal models. Modulation of the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) or nuclear receptor (NR4A) pathways is able to block or reverse the development of detrimental epigenetic scars. Similarly, drugs that directly modify epigenetic enzymes, such as those that inhibit histone deacetylases (HDAC) inhibitors, DNA hypomethylating agents or modifiers of the Nucleosome Remodeling and DNA methylation (NuRD) complex or Polycomb Repressive Complex (PRC) have demonstrated capacity to restore host immunity in the setting of cancer-, LCMV- or murine sepsis-induced epigenetic-mediated immune suppression. A third clinically feasible strategy for reversing detrimental epigenetic scars includes bioengineering approaches to either directly reverse the detrimental epigenetic marks or to modify the epigenetic enzymes or transcription factors that induce detrimental epigenetic scars. Each of these approaches, alone or in combination, have ablated or reversed detrimental epigenetic marks in in-vitro or in animal models; translational studies are now required to evaluate clinical applicability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8215363 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82153632021-06-22 Reversing Post-Infectious Epigenetic-Mediated Immune Suppression Abhimanyu, Ontiveros, Carlos O. Guerra-Resendez, Rosa S. Nishiguchi, Tomoki Ladki, Malik Hilton, Isaac B. Schlesinger, Larry S. DiNardo, Andrew R. Front Immunol Immunology The immune response must balance the pro-inflammatory, cell-mediated cytotoxicity with the anti-inflammatory and wound repair response. Epigenetic mechanisms mediate this balance and limit host immunity from inducing exuberant collateral damage to host tissue after severe and chronic infections. However, following treatment for these infections, including sepsis, pneumonia, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, HIV, tuberculosis (TB) or schistosomiasis, detrimental epigenetic scars persist, and result in long-lasting immune suppression. This is hypothesized to be one of the contributing mechanisms explaining why survivors of infection have increased all-cause mortality and increased rates of unrelated secondary infections. The mechanisms that induce epigenetic-mediated immune suppression have been demonstrated in-vitro and in animal models. Modulation of the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) or nuclear receptor (NR4A) pathways is able to block or reverse the development of detrimental epigenetic scars. Similarly, drugs that directly modify epigenetic enzymes, such as those that inhibit histone deacetylases (HDAC) inhibitors, DNA hypomethylating agents or modifiers of the Nucleosome Remodeling and DNA methylation (NuRD) complex or Polycomb Repressive Complex (PRC) have demonstrated capacity to restore host immunity in the setting of cancer-, LCMV- or murine sepsis-induced epigenetic-mediated immune suppression. A third clinically feasible strategy for reversing detrimental epigenetic scars includes bioengineering approaches to either directly reverse the detrimental epigenetic marks or to modify the epigenetic enzymes or transcription factors that induce detrimental epigenetic scars. Each of these approaches, alone or in combination, have ablated or reversed detrimental epigenetic marks in in-vitro or in animal models; translational studies are now required to evaluate clinical applicability. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8215363/ /pubmed/34163486 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.688132 Text en Copyright © 2021 Abhimanyu, Ontiveros, Guerra-Resendez, Nishiguchi, Ladki, Hilton, Schlesinger and DiNardo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Immunology Abhimanyu, Ontiveros, Carlos O. Guerra-Resendez, Rosa S. Nishiguchi, Tomoki Ladki, Malik Hilton, Isaac B. Schlesinger, Larry S. DiNardo, Andrew R. Reversing Post-Infectious Epigenetic-Mediated Immune Suppression |
title | Reversing Post-Infectious Epigenetic-Mediated Immune Suppression |
title_full | Reversing Post-Infectious Epigenetic-Mediated Immune Suppression |
title_fullStr | Reversing Post-Infectious Epigenetic-Mediated Immune Suppression |
title_full_unstemmed | Reversing Post-Infectious Epigenetic-Mediated Immune Suppression |
title_short | Reversing Post-Infectious Epigenetic-Mediated Immune Suppression |
title_sort | reversing post-infectious epigenetic-mediated immune suppression |
topic | Immunology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8215363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34163486 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.688132 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abhimanyu reversingpostinfectiousepigeneticmediatedimmunesuppression AT ontiveroscarloso reversingpostinfectiousepigeneticmediatedimmunesuppression AT guerraresendezrosas reversingpostinfectiousepigeneticmediatedimmunesuppression AT nishiguchitomoki reversingpostinfectiousepigeneticmediatedimmunesuppression AT ladkimalik reversingpostinfectiousepigeneticmediatedimmunesuppression AT hiltonisaacb reversingpostinfectiousepigeneticmediatedimmunesuppression AT schlesingerlarrys reversingpostinfectiousepigeneticmediatedimmunesuppression AT dinardoandrewr reversingpostinfectiousepigeneticmediatedimmunesuppression |