Cargando…

Is Peripheral Motion Detection Affected by Myopia?

PURPOSE: The current study was to investigate whether myopia affected peripheral motion detection and whether the potential effect interacted with spatial frequency, motion speed, or eccentricity. METHODS: Seventeen young adults aged 22–26 years participated in the study. They were six low to medium...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wei, Junhan, Kong, Deying, Yu, Xi, Wei, Lili, Xiong, Yue, Yang, Adeline, Drobe, Björn, Bao, Jinhua, Zhou, Jiawei, Gao, Yi, He, Zhifen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8215660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34163327
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.683153
_version_ 1783710284640157696
author Wei, Junhan
Kong, Deying
Yu, Xi
Wei, Lili
Xiong, Yue
Yang, Adeline
Drobe, Björn
Bao, Jinhua
Zhou, Jiawei
Gao, Yi
He, Zhifen
author_facet Wei, Junhan
Kong, Deying
Yu, Xi
Wei, Lili
Xiong, Yue
Yang, Adeline
Drobe, Björn
Bao, Jinhua
Zhou, Jiawei
Gao, Yi
He, Zhifen
author_sort Wei, Junhan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The current study was to investigate whether myopia affected peripheral motion detection and whether the potential effect interacted with spatial frequency, motion speed, or eccentricity. METHODS: Seventeen young adults aged 22–26 years participated in the study. They were six low to medium myopes [spherical equivalent refractions −1.0 to −5.0 D (diopter)], five high myopes (<-5.5 D) and six emmetropes (+0.5 to −0.5 D). All myopes were corrected by self-prepared, habitual soft contact lenses. A four-alternative forced-choice task in which the subject was to determine the location of the phase-shifting Gabor from the four quadrants (superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal) of the visual field, was employed. The experiment was blocked by eccentricity (20° and 27°), spatial frequency (0.6, 1.2, 2.4, and 4.0 cycles per degree (c/d) for 20° eccentricity, and 0.6, 1.2, 2.0, and 3.2 c/d for 27° eccentricity), as well as the motion speed [2 and 6 degree per second (d/s)]. RESULTS: Mixed-model analysis of variances showed no significant difference in the thresholds of peripheral motion detection between three refractive groups at either 20° (F[2,14] = 0.145, p = 0.866) or 27° (F[2,14] = 0.475, p = 0.632). At 20°, lower motion detection thresholds were associated with higher myopia (p < 0.05) mostly for low spatial frequency and high-speed targets in the nasal and superior quadrants, and for high spatial frequency and high-speed targets in the temporal quadrant in myopic viewers. Whereas at 27°, no significant correlation was found between the spherical equivalent and the peripheral motion detection threshold under all conditions (all p > 0.1). Spatial frequency, speed, and quadrant of the visual field all showed significant effect on the peripheral motion detection threshold. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between the three refractive groups in peripheral motion detection. However, lower motion detection thresholds were associated with higher myopia, mostly for low spatial frequency targets, at 20° in myopic viewers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8215660
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82156602021-06-22 Is Peripheral Motion Detection Affected by Myopia? Wei, Junhan Kong, Deying Yu, Xi Wei, Lili Xiong, Yue Yang, Adeline Drobe, Björn Bao, Jinhua Zhou, Jiawei Gao, Yi He, Zhifen Front Neurosci Neuroscience PURPOSE: The current study was to investigate whether myopia affected peripheral motion detection and whether the potential effect interacted with spatial frequency, motion speed, or eccentricity. METHODS: Seventeen young adults aged 22–26 years participated in the study. They were six low to medium myopes [spherical equivalent refractions −1.0 to −5.0 D (diopter)], five high myopes (<-5.5 D) and six emmetropes (+0.5 to −0.5 D). All myopes were corrected by self-prepared, habitual soft contact lenses. A four-alternative forced-choice task in which the subject was to determine the location of the phase-shifting Gabor from the four quadrants (superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal) of the visual field, was employed. The experiment was blocked by eccentricity (20° and 27°), spatial frequency (0.6, 1.2, 2.4, and 4.0 cycles per degree (c/d) for 20° eccentricity, and 0.6, 1.2, 2.0, and 3.2 c/d for 27° eccentricity), as well as the motion speed [2 and 6 degree per second (d/s)]. RESULTS: Mixed-model analysis of variances showed no significant difference in the thresholds of peripheral motion detection between three refractive groups at either 20° (F[2,14] = 0.145, p = 0.866) or 27° (F[2,14] = 0.475, p = 0.632). At 20°, lower motion detection thresholds were associated with higher myopia (p < 0.05) mostly for low spatial frequency and high-speed targets in the nasal and superior quadrants, and for high spatial frequency and high-speed targets in the temporal quadrant in myopic viewers. Whereas at 27°, no significant correlation was found between the spherical equivalent and the peripheral motion detection threshold under all conditions (all p > 0.1). Spatial frequency, speed, and quadrant of the visual field all showed significant effect on the peripheral motion detection threshold. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between the three refractive groups in peripheral motion detection. However, lower motion detection thresholds were associated with higher myopia, mostly for low spatial frequency targets, at 20° in myopic viewers. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8215660/ /pubmed/34163327 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.683153 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wei, Kong, Yu, Wei, Xiong, Yang, Drobe, Bao, Zhou, Gao and He. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Wei, Junhan
Kong, Deying
Yu, Xi
Wei, Lili
Xiong, Yue
Yang, Adeline
Drobe, Björn
Bao, Jinhua
Zhou, Jiawei
Gao, Yi
He, Zhifen
Is Peripheral Motion Detection Affected by Myopia?
title Is Peripheral Motion Detection Affected by Myopia?
title_full Is Peripheral Motion Detection Affected by Myopia?
title_fullStr Is Peripheral Motion Detection Affected by Myopia?
title_full_unstemmed Is Peripheral Motion Detection Affected by Myopia?
title_short Is Peripheral Motion Detection Affected by Myopia?
title_sort is peripheral motion detection affected by myopia?
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8215660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34163327
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.683153
work_keys_str_mv AT weijunhan isperipheralmotiondetectionaffectedbymyopia
AT kongdeying isperipheralmotiondetectionaffectedbymyopia
AT yuxi isperipheralmotiondetectionaffectedbymyopia
AT weilili isperipheralmotiondetectionaffectedbymyopia
AT xiongyue isperipheralmotiondetectionaffectedbymyopia
AT yangadeline isperipheralmotiondetectionaffectedbymyopia
AT drobebjorn isperipheralmotiondetectionaffectedbymyopia
AT baojinhua isperipheralmotiondetectionaffectedbymyopia
AT zhoujiawei isperipheralmotiondetectionaffectedbymyopia
AT gaoyi isperipheralmotiondetectionaffectedbymyopia
AT hezhifen isperipheralmotiondetectionaffectedbymyopia