Cargando…

Contrast and Conflict in Dutch Vowels

The nature of phonological representations has been extensively studied in phonology and psycholinguistics. While full specification is still the norm in psycholinguistic research, underspecified representations may better account for perceptual asymmetries. In this paper, we report on a mismatch ne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Rue, Nadine P. W. D., Snijders, Tineke M., Fikkert, Paula
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8215709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34163338
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.629648
_version_ 1783710293991358464
author de Rue, Nadine P. W. D.
Snijders, Tineke M.
Fikkert, Paula
author_facet de Rue, Nadine P. W. D.
Snijders, Tineke M.
Fikkert, Paula
author_sort de Rue, Nadine P. W. D.
collection PubMed
description The nature of phonological representations has been extensively studied in phonology and psycholinguistics. While full specification is still the norm in psycholinguistic research, underspecified representations may better account for perceptual asymmetries. In this paper, we report on a mismatch negativity (MMN) study with Dutch listeners who took part in a passive oddball paradigm to investigate when the brain notices the difference between expected and observed vowels. In particular, we tested neural discrimination (indicating perceptual discrimination) of the tense mid vowel pairs /o/-/ø/ (place contrast), /e/-/ø/ (labiality or rounding contrast), and /e/-/o/ (place and labiality contrast). Our results show (a) a perceptual asymmetry for place in the /o/-/ø/ contrast, supporting underspecification of [CORONAL] and replicating earlier results for German, and (b) a perceptual asymmetry for labiality for the /e/-/ø/ contrast, which was not reported in the German study. A labial deviant [ø] (standard /e/) yielded a larger MMN than a deviant [e] (standard /ø/). No asymmetry was found for the two-feature contrast. This study partly replicates a similar MMN study on German vowels, and partly presents new findings indicating cross-linguistic differences. Although the vowel inventory of Dutch and German is to a large extent comparable, their (morpho)phonological systems are different, which is reflected in processing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8215709
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82157092021-06-22 Contrast and Conflict in Dutch Vowels de Rue, Nadine P. W. D. Snijders, Tineke M. Fikkert, Paula Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience The nature of phonological representations has been extensively studied in phonology and psycholinguistics. While full specification is still the norm in psycholinguistic research, underspecified representations may better account for perceptual asymmetries. In this paper, we report on a mismatch negativity (MMN) study with Dutch listeners who took part in a passive oddball paradigm to investigate when the brain notices the difference between expected and observed vowels. In particular, we tested neural discrimination (indicating perceptual discrimination) of the tense mid vowel pairs /o/-/ø/ (place contrast), /e/-/ø/ (labiality or rounding contrast), and /e/-/o/ (place and labiality contrast). Our results show (a) a perceptual asymmetry for place in the /o/-/ø/ contrast, supporting underspecification of [CORONAL] and replicating earlier results for German, and (b) a perceptual asymmetry for labiality for the /e/-/ø/ contrast, which was not reported in the German study. A labial deviant [ø] (standard /e/) yielded a larger MMN than a deviant [e] (standard /ø/). No asymmetry was found for the two-feature contrast. This study partly replicates a similar MMN study on German vowels, and partly presents new findings indicating cross-linguistic differences. Although the vowel inventory of Dutch and German is to a large extent comparable, their (morpho)phonological systems are different, which is reflected in processing. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8215709/ /pubmed/34163338 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.629648 Text en Copyright © 2021 de Rue, Snijders and Fikkert. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
de Rue, Nadine P. W. D.
Snijders, Tineke M.
Fikkert, Paula
Contrast and Conflict in Dutch Vowels
title Contrast and Conflict in Dutch Vowels
title_full Contrast and Conflict in Dutch Vowels
title_fullStr Contrast and Conflict in Dutch Vowels
title_full_unstemmed Contrast and Conflict in Dutch Vowels
title_short Contrast and Conflict in Dutch Vowels
title_sort contrast and conflict in dutch vowels
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8215709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34163338
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.629648
work_keys_str_mv AT deruenadinepwd contrastandconflictindutchvowels
AT snijderstinekem contrastandconflictindutchvowels
AT fikkertpaula contrastandconflictindutchvowels