Cargando…

Recombinant human luteinizing hormone co-treatment in ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology in women of advanced reproductive age: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION: Several studies suggest that luteinizing hormone (LH) could improve IVF outcome in women of advanced reproductive age by optimizing androgen production. In this review, we assessed the role of recombinant-human LH (r-hLH) and recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) co-t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Conforti, Alessandro, Esteves, Sandro C., Humaidan, Peter, Longobardi, Salvatore, D’Hooghe, Thomas, Orvieto, Raoul, Vaiarelli, Alberto, Cimadomo, Danilo, Rienzi, Laura, Ubaldi, Filippo Maria, Zullo, Fulvio, Alviggi, Carlo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8215738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34154604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-021-00759-4
_version_ 1783710297779863552
author Conforti, Alessandro
Esteves, Sandro C.
Humaidan, Peter
Longobardi, Salvatore
D’Hooghe, Thomas
Orvieto, Raoul
Vaiarelli, Alberto
Cimadomo, Danilo
Rienzi, Laura
Ubaldi, Filippo Maria
Zullo, Fulvio
Alviggi, Carlo
author_facet Conforti, Alessandro
Esteves, Sandro C.
Humaidan, Peter
Longobardi, Salvatore
D’Hooghe, Thomas
Orvieto, Raoul
Vaiarelli, Alberto
Cimadomo, Danilo
Rienzi, Laura
Ubaldi, Filippo Maria
Zullo, Fulvio
Alviggi, Carlo
author_sort Conforti, Alessandro
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Several studies suggest that luteinizing hormone (LH) could improve IVF outcome in women of advanced reproductive age by optimizing androgen production. In this review, we assessed the role of recombinant-human LH (r-hLH) and recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) co-treatment in ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology in women of advanced reproductive age candidates for assisted reproduction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using a preregistered protocol we systematically searched Medline/PubMed, Scopus and the ISI Web of Science databases to identify randomized controlled trials in which r-hFSH monotherapy protocols were compared with r-hFSH/r-hLH co-treatment in women ≥35 years undergoing fresh IVF cycles. We calculated the pooled odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous data and the weight mean difference (WMD) for continuous data with an associated 95% confidence interval (CI). The meta-analyses were conducted using the random-effect model. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Subgroup analyses of all primary and secondary outcomes were performed only in women aged 35–40 years. RESULTS: Twelve studies were identified. In women aged between 35 and 40 years, r-hFSH/r-hLH co-treatment was associated with higher clinical pregnancy rates (OR 1.45, CI 95% 1.05–2.00, I(2) = 0%, P = 0.03) and implantation rates (OR 1.49, CI 95% 1.10–2.01, I(2) = 13%, P = 0.01) versus r-hFSH monotherapy. Fewer oocytes were retrieved in r-hFSH/r-hLH-treated patients than in r-hFSH-treated patients both in women aged ≥35 years (WMD -0.82 CI 95% -1.40 to − 0.24, I(2) = 88%, P = 0.005) and in those aged between 35 and 40 years (WMD -1.03, CI − 1.89 to − 0.17, I(2) = 0%, P = 0.02). The number of metaphase II oocytes, miscarriage rates and live birth rates did not differ between the two groups of women overall or in subgroup analysis. CONCLUSION: Although more oocytes were retrieved in patients who underwent r-hFSH monotherapy, this meta-analysis suggests that r-hFSH/r-hLH co-treatment improves clinical pregnancy and implantation rates in women between 35 and 40 years of age undergoing ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction technology. However, more RCTs using narrower age ranges in advanced age women are warranted to corroborate these findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12958-021-00759-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8215738
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82157382021-06-23 Recombinant human luteinizing hormone co-treatment in ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology in women of advanced reproductive age: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Conforti, Alessandro Esteves, Sandro C. Humaidan, Peter Longobardi, Salvatore D’Hooghe, Thomas Orvieto, Raoul Vaiarelli, Alberto Cimadomo, Danilo Rienzi, Laura Ubaldi, Filippo Maria Zullo, Fulvio Alviggi, Carlo Reprod Biol Endocrinol Review INTRODUCTION: Several studies suggest that luteinizing hormone (LH) could improve IVF outcome in women of advanced reproductive age by optimizing androgen production. In this review, we assessed the role of recombinant-human LH (r-hLH) and recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) co-treatment in ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology in women of advanced reproductive age candidates for assisted reproduction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using a preregistered protocol we systematically searched Medline/PubMed, Scopus and the ISI Web of Science databases to identify randomized controlled trials in which r-hFSH monotherapy protocols were compared with r-hFSH/r-hLH co-treatment in women ≥35 years undergoing fresh IVF cycles. We calculated the pooled odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous data and the weight mean difference (WMD) for continuous data with an associated 95% confidence interval (CI). The meta-analyses were conducted using the random-effect model. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Subgroup analyses of all primary and secondary outcomes were performed only in women aged 35–40 years. RESULTS: Twelve studies were identified. In women aged between 35 and 40 years, r-hFSH/r-hLH co-treatment was associated with higher clinical pregnancy rates (OR 1.45, CI 95% 1.05–2.00, I(2) = 0%, P = 0.03) and implantation rates (OR 1.49, CI 95% 1.10–2.01, I(2) = 13%, P = 0.01) versus r-hFSH monotherapy. Fewer oocytes were retrieved in r-hFSH/r-hLH-treated patients than in r-hFSH-treated patients both in women aged ≥35 years (WMD -0.82 CI 95% -1.40 to − 0.24, I(2) = 88%, P = 0.005) and in those aged between 35 and 40 years (WMD -1.03, CI − 1.89 to − 0.17, I(2) = 0%, P = 0.02). The number of metaphase II oocytes, miscarriage rates and live birth rates did not differ between the two groups of women overall or in subgroup analysis. CONCLUSION: Although more oocytes were retrieved in patients who underwent r-hFSH monotherapy, this meta-analysis suggests that r-hFSH/r-hLH co-treatment improves clinical pregnancy and implantation rates in women between 35 and 40 years of age undergoing ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction technology. However, more RCTs using narrower age ranges in advanced age women are warranted to corroborate these findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12958-021-00759-4. BioMed Central 2021-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8215738/ /pubmed/34154604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-021-00759-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Conforti, Alessandro
Esteves, Sandro C.
Humaidan, Peter
Longobardi, Salvatore
D’Hooghe, Thomas
Orvieto, Raoul
Vaiarelli, Alberto
Cimadomo, Danilo
Rienzi, Laura
Ubaldi, Filippo Maria
Zullo, Fulvio
Alviggi, Carlo
Recombinant human luteinizing hormone co-treatment in ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology in women of advanced reproductive age: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Recombinant human luteinizing hormone co-treatment in ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology in women of advanced reproductive age: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Recombinant human luteinizing hormone co-treatment in ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology in women of advanced reproductive age: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Recombinant human luteinizing hormone co-treatment in ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology in women of advanced reproductive age: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Recombinant human luteinizing hormone co-treatment in ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology in women of advanced reproductive age: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Recombinant human luteinizing hormone co-treatment in ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology in women of advanced reproductive age: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort recombinant human luteinizing hormone co-treatment in ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology in women of advanced reproductive age: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8215738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34154604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-021-00759-4
work_keys_str_mv AT confortialessandro recombinanthumanluteinizinghormonecotreatmentinovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnologyinwomenofadvancedreproductiveageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT estevessandroc recombinanthumanluteinizinghormonecotreatmentinovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnologyinwomenofadvancedreproductiveageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT humaidanpeter recombinanthumanluteinizinghormonecotreatmentinovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnologyinwomenofadvancedreproductiveageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT longobardisalvatore recombinanthumanluteinizinghormonecotreatmentinovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnologyinwomenofadvancedreproductiveageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT dhooghethomas recombinanthumanluteinizinghormonecotreatmentinovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnologyinwomenofadvancedreproductiveageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT orvietoraoul recombinanthumanluteinizinghormonecotreatmentinovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnologyinwomenofadvancedreproductiveageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT vaiarellialberto recombinanthumanluteinizinghormonecotreatmentinovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnologyinwomenofadvancedreproductiveageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT cimadomodanilo recombinanthumanluteinizinghormonecotreatmentinovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnologyinwomenofadvancedreproductiveageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT rienzilaura recombinanthumanluteinizinghormonecotreatmentinovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnologyinwomenofadvancedreproductiveageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT ubaldifilippomaria recombinanthumanluteinizinghormonecotreatmentinovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnologyinwomenofadvancedreproductiveageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zullofulvio recombinanthumanluteinizinghormonecotreatmentinovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnologyinwomenofadvancedreproductiveageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT alviggicarlo recombinanthumanluteinizinghormonecotreatmentinovarianstimulationforassistedreproductivetechnologyinwomenofadvancedreproductiveageasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials