Cargando…

Lateral entry pins and Slongo’s external fixation: which method is more ideal for older children with supracondylar humeral fractures?

OBJECTIVE: The standard surgical treatment for supracondylar humeral fractures in children is closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. Given the need for greater fixation strength and higher risk of joint stiffness for children older than 8 years, external fixation is often performed for treating...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Man, Wang, Qian, Zhao, Jingxin, Jin, Yu, Wang, Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8215768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34154623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02541-z
_version_ 1783710303032180736
author He, Man
Wang, Qian
Zhao, Jingxin
Jin, Yu
Wang, Yu
author_facet He, Man
Wang, Qian
Zhao, Jingxin
Jin, Yu
Wang, Yu
author_sort He, Man
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The standard surgical treatment for supracondylar humeral fractures in children is closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. Given the need for greater fixation strength and higher risk of joint stiffness for children older than 8 years, external fixation is often performed for treating supracondylar humeral fractures in older children. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of lateral entry pins and Slongo’s external fixation for treating supracondylar humeral fractures in older children. METHODS: Children older than 8 years who underwent surgery for supracondylar humeral fractures at our hospital for surgery from January 2016 to December 2020 are to be retrospectively assessed. One group (n = 36) underwent internal fixation and percutaneous pinning with three lateral Kirschner wires, and the other group (n = 32) underwent Slongo’s external fixator surgery. The demographic data, operation duration, number of fluoroscopies, and fracture healing time were compared between both groups. The elbow joint function was evaluated 6 months after the surgery on the basis of fracture healing time, lifting angle, elbow joint range of motion (ROM), and Flynn score. The incidence of postoperative complications was also recorded. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two patient groups in terms of the demographic parameters. Compared to external fixation surgery, Kirschner wire surgery required shorter duration and fewer fluoroscopies (P < 0.05). Nevertheless, the fracture healing time was significantly less (P < 0.05), and the elbow ROM and Flynn scores were higher in the external fixator group compared to the Kirschner wire fixation group (P < 0.05). There was one case of secondary fracture displacement in the Kirschner wire group and one of pin tract infection in the external fixator group. No other iatrogenic injuries or complications were observed. CONCLUSION: Maybe Slongo’s external fixator is a suitable alternative treatment option for supracondylar humeral fractures in children older than 8 years since it can achieve better fixation strength and early restoration of elbow joint movement with a lower risk of joint stiffness. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02541-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8215768
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82157682021-06-23 Lateral entry pins and Slongo’s external fixation: which method is more ideal for older children with supracondylar humeral fractures? He, Man Wang, Qian Zhao, Jingxin Jin, Yu Wang, Yu J Orthop Surg Res Research Article OBJECTIVE: The standard surgical treatment for supracondylar humeral fractures in children is closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. Given the need for greater fixation strength and higher risk of joint stiffness for children older than 8 years, external fixation is often performed for treating supracondylar humeral fractures in older children. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of lateral entry pins and Slongo’s external fixation for treating supracondylar humeral fractures in older children. METHODS: Children older than 8 years who underwent surgery for supracondylar humeral fractures at our hospital for surgery from January 2016 to December 2020 are to be retrospectively assessed. One group (n = 36) underwent internal fixation and percutaneous pinning with three lateral Kirschner wires, and the other group (n = 32) underwent Slongo’s external fixator surgery. The demographic data, operation duration, number of fluoroscopies, and fracture healing time were compared between both groups. The elbow joint function was evaluated 6 months after the surgery on the basis of fracture healing time, lifting angle, elbow joint range of motion (ROM), and Flynn score. The incidence of postoperative complications was also recorded. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two patient groups in terms of the demographic parameters. Compared to external fixation surgery, Kirschner wire surgery required shorter duration and fewer fluoroscopies (P < 0.05). Nevertheless, the fracture healing time was significantly less (P < 0.05), and the elbow ROM and Flynn scores were higher in the external fixator group compared to the Kirschner wire fixation group (P < 0.05). There was one case of secondary fracture displacement in the Kirschner wire group and one of pin tract infection in the external fixator group. No other iatrogenic injuries or complications were observed. CONCLUSION: Maybe Slongo’s external fixator is a suitable alternative treatment option for supracondylar humeral fractures in children older than 8 years since it can achieve better fixation strength and early restoration of elbow joint movement with a lower risk of joint stiffness. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02541-z. BioMed Central 2021-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8215768/ /pubmed/34154623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02541-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
He, Man
Wang, Qian
Zhao, Jingxin
Jin, Yu
Wang, Yu
Lateral entry pins and Slongo’s external fixation: which method is more ideal for older children with supracondylar humeral fractures?
title Lateral entry pins and Slongo’s external fixation: which method is more ideal for older children with supracondylar humeral fractures?
title_full Lateral entry pins and Slongo’s external fixation: which method is more ideal for older children with supracondylar humeral fractures?
title_fullStr Lateral entry pins and Slongo’s external fixation: which method is more ideal for older children with supracondylar humeral fractures?
title_full_unstemmed Lateral entry pins and Slongo’s external fixation: which method is more ideal for older children with supracondylar humeral fractures?
title_short Lateral entry pins and Slongo’s external fixation: which method is more ideal for older children with supracondylar humeral fractures?
title_sort lateral entry pins and slongo’s external fixation: which method is more ideal for older children with supracondylar humeral fractures?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8215768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34154623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02541-z
work_keys_str_mv AT heman lateralentrypinsandslongosexternalfixationwhichmethodismoreidealforolderchildrenwithsupracondylarhumeralfractures
AT wangqian lateralentrypinsandslongosexternalfixationwhichmethodismoreidealforolderchildrenwithsupracondylarhumeralfractures
AT zhaojingxin lateralentrypinsandslongosexternalfixationwhichmethodismoreidealforolderchildrenwithsupracondylarhumeralfractures
AT jinyu lateralentrypinsandslongosexternalfixationwhichmethodismoreidealforolderchildrenwithsupracondylarhumeralfractures
AT wangyu lateralentrypinsandslongosexternalfixationwhichmethodismoreidealforolderchildrenwithsupracondylarhumeralfractures