Cargando…
Development and validation of a risk index to predict kidney graft survival: the kidney transplant risk index
BACKGROUND: Kidney graft failure risk prediction models assist evidence-based medical decision-making in clinical practice. Our objective was to develop and validate statistical and machine learning predictive models to predict death-censored graft failure following deceased donor kidney transplant,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8215818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34154541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01319-5 |
_version_ | 1783710312904523776 |
---|---|
author | Senanayake, Sameera Kularatna, Sanjeewa Healy, Helen Graves, Nicholas Baboolal, Keshwar Sypek, Matthew P. Barnett, Adrian |
author_facet | Senanayake, Sameera Kularatna, Sanjeewa Healy, Helen Graves, Nicholas Baboolal, Keshwar Sypek, Matthew P. Barnett, Adrian |
author_sort | Senanayake, Sameera |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Kidney graft failure risk prediction models assist evidence-based medical decision-making in clinical practice. Our objective was to develop and validate statistical and machine learning predictive models to predict death-censored graft failure following deceased donor kidney transplant, using time-to-event (survival) data in a large national dataset from Australia. METHODS: Data included donor and recipient characteristics (n = 98) of 7,365 deceased donor transplants from January 1st, 2007 to December 31st, 2017 conducted in Australia. Seven variable selection methods were used to identify the most important independent variables included in the model. Predictive models were developed using: survival tree, random survival forest, survival support vector machine and Cox proportional regression. The models were trained using 70% of the data and validated using the rest of the data (30%). The model with best discriminatory power, assessed using concordance index (C-index) was chosen as the best model. RESULTS: Two models, developed using cox regression and random survival forest, had the highest C-index (0.67) in discriminating death-censored graft failure. The best fitting Cox model used seven independent variables and showed moderate level of prediction accuracy (calibration). CONCLUSION: This index displays sufficient robustness to be used in pre-transplant decision making and may perform better than currently available tools. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-021-01319-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8215818 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82158182021-06-23 Development and validation of a risk index to predict kidney graft survival: the kidney transplant risk index Senanayake, Sameera Kularatna, Sanjeewa Healy, Helen Graves, Nicholas Baboolal, Keshwar Sypek, Matthew P. Barnett, Adrian BMC Med Res Methodol Research BACKGROUND: Kidney graft failure risk prediction models assist evidence-based medical decision-making in clinical practice. Our objective was to develop and validate statistical and machine learning predictive models to predict death-censored graft failure following deceased donor kidney transplant, using time-to-event (survival) data in a large national dataset from Australia. METHODS: Data included donor and recipient characteristics (n = 98) of 7,365 deceased donor transplants from January 1st, 2007 to December 31st, 2017 conducted in Australia. Seven variable selection methods were used to identify the most important independent variables included in the model. Predictive models were developed using: survival tree, random survival forest, survival support vector machine and Cox proportional regression. The models were trained using 70% of the data and validated using the rest of the data (30%). The model with best discriminatory power, assessed using concordance index (C-index) was chosen as the best model. RESULTS: Two models, developed using cox regression and random survival forest, had the highest C-index (0.67) in discriminating death-censored graft failure. The best fitting Cox model used seven independent variables and showed moderate level of prediction accuracy (calibration). CONCLUSION: This index displays sufficient robustness to be used in pre-transplant decision making and may perform better than currently available tools. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-021-01319-5. BioMed Central 2021-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8215818/ /pubmed/34154541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01319-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Senanayake, Sameera Kularatna, Sanjeewa Healy, Helen Graves, Nicholas Baboolal, Keshwar Sypek, Matthew P. Barnett, Adrian Development and validation of a risk index to predict kidney graft survival: the kidney transplant risk index |
title | Development and validation of a risk index to predict kidney graft survival: the kidney transplant risk index |
title_full | Development and validation of a risk index to predict kidney graft survival: the kidney transplant risk index |
title_fullStr | Development and validation of a risk index to predict kidney graft survival: the kidney transplant risk index |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and validation of a risk index to predict kidney graft survival: the kidney transplant risk index |
title_short | Development and validation of a risk index to predict kidney graft survival: the kidney transplant risk index |
title_sort | development and validation of a risk index to predict kidney graft survival: the kidney transplant risk index |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8215818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34154541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01319-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT senanayakesameera developmentandvalidationofariskindextopredictkidneygraftsurvivalthekidneytransplantriskindex AT kularatnasanjeewa developmentandvalidationofariskindextopredictkidneygraftsurvivalthekidneytransplantriskindex AT healyhelen developmentandvalidationofariskindextopredictkidneygraftsurvivalthekidneytransplantriskindex AT gravesnicholas developmentandvalidationofariskindextopredictkidneygraftsurvivalthekidneytransplantriskindex AT baboolalkeshwar developmentandvalidationofariskindextopredictkidneygraftsurvivalthekidneytransplantriskindex AT sypekmatthewp developmentandvalidationofariskindextopredictkidneygraftsurvivalthekidneytransplantriskindex AT barnettadrian developmentandvalidationofariskindextopredictkidneygraftsurvivalthekidneytransplantriskindex |