Cargando…

Standard contractual clauses for cross-border transfers of health data after Schrems II

Standard contractual clauses (SCCs) have long been considered the most accessible method to transfer personal data legally across borders. In July 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Limited, Maximillian Schrems (Schrems II) plac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bradford, Laura, Aboy, Mateo, Liddell, Kathleen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8216070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34164131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsab007
_version_ 1783710349130727424
author Bradford, Laura
Aboy, Mateo
Liddell, Kathleen
author_facet Bradford, Laura
Aboy, Mateo
Liddell, Kathleen
author_sort Bradford, Laura
collection PubMed
description Standard contractual clauses (SCCs) have long been considered the most accessible method to transfer personal data legally across borders. In July 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Limited, Maximillian Schrems (Schrems II) placed heavy conditions on their use. The Schrems II Court found that SCCs were valid as ‘appropriate safeguards’ for data transfers from EU entities to others outside the EU/EEA as long as unspecified ‘supplementary measures’ were in place to compensate for the lack of data protection in the third country. Data protection officers are under intense pressure to explain these measures and allow routine transfers to continue. Some authorities interpret the decision as preventing the use of SCCs to transfer personal data outside of the EU because private contracts cannot comprehensively redress gaps in national law. This article argues that these authorities are mistaken and that notwithstanding Schrems II SCCs can still be useful instruments for cross-border transfers. This is especially true in highly regulated contexts such as medical research. This paper traces the history of SCCs under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and shows how the CJEU in Schrems II misunderstood the purpose of SCCs and other Article 46 GDPR ‘appropriate safeguards’. The CJEU mistakenly approached Article 46 safeguards such as SCCs as being similar to country-specific adequacy rulings under Article 45 GDPR. But unlike Article 45 adequacy rulings, SCCs were not intended to provide a stand-alone mechanism for transfer reliant on the law of the importing country. Rather SCCs provide an alternative, multi-layered standard for data protection that encompasses law, technology and organizational commitments. Their purpose is to be used in situations where legislation alone is insufficient to protect data subject rights. The European Commission’s new draft SCCs support this analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8216070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82160702021-06-22 Standard contractual clauses for cross-border transfers of health data after Schrems II Bradford, Laura Aboy, Mateo Liddell, Kathleen J Law Biosci Original Article Standard contractual clauses (SCCs) have long been considered the most accessible method to transfer personal data legally across borders. In July 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Limited, Maximillian Schrems (Schrems II) placed heavy conditions on their use. The Schrems II Court found that SCCs were valid as ‘appropriate safeguards’ for data transfers from EU entities to others outside the EU/EEA as long as unspecified ‘supplementary measures’ were in place to compensate for the lack of data protection in the third country. Data protection officers are under intense pressure to explain these measures and allow routine transfers to continue. Some authorities interpret the decision as preventing the use of SCCs to transfer personal data outside of the EU because private contracts cannot comprehensively redress gaps in national law. This article argues that these authorities are mistaken and that notwithstanding Schrems II SCCs can still be useful instruments for cross-border transfers. This is especially true in highly regulated contexts such as medical research. This paper traces the history of SCCs under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and shows how the CJEU in Schrems II misunderstood the purpose of SCCs and other Article 46 GDPR ‘appropriate safeguards’. The CJEU mistakenly approached Article 46 safeguards such as SCCs as being similar to country-specific adequacy rulings under Article 45 GDPR. But unlike Article 45 adequacy rulings, SCCs were not intended to provide a stand-alone mechanism for transfer reliant on the law of the importing country. Rather SCCs provide an alternative, multi-layered standard for data protection that encompasses law, technology and organizational commitments. Their purpose is to be used in situations where legislation alone is insufficient to protect data subject rights. The European Commission’s new draft SCCs support this analysis. Oxford University Press 2021-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8216070/ /pubmed/34164131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsab007 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Duke University School of Law, Harvard Law School, Oxford University Press, and Stanford Law School. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Bradford, Laura
Aboy, Mateo
Liddell, Kathleen
Standard contractual clauses for cross-border transfers of health data after Schrems II
title Standard contractual clauses for cross-border transfers of health data after Schrems II
title_full Standard contractual clauses for cross-border transfers of health data after Schrems II
title_fullStr Standard contractual clauses for cross-border transfers of health data after Schrems II
title_full_unstemmed Standard contractual clauses for cross-border transfers of health data after Schrems II
title_short Standard contractual clauses for cross-border transfers of health data after Schrems II
title_sort standard contractual clauses for cross-border transfers of health data after schrems ii
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8216070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34164131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsab007
work_keys_str_mv AT bradfordlaura standardcontractualclausesforcrossbordertransfersofhealthdataafterschremsii
AT aboymateo standardcontractualclausesforcrossbordertransfersofhealthdataafterschremsii
AT liddellkathleen standardcontractualclausesforcrossbordertransfersofhealthdataafterschremsii