Cargando…
Study of Spinal Cord Substructure Expansion Margin in Esophageal Cancer
PURPOSE: To analyze the setup errors and residual errors of different spinal cord parts in esophageal cancer patients and to explore the necessity of spinal cord segmental expansion. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixty cases of esophageal cancer were included with 20 patients subdivided into the following...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8216358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34137317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338211024559 |
_version_ | 1783710401538555904 |
---|---|
author | Li, Dingjie Wei, Shengtao Li, Tian Liu, Yang Cai, Jing Ge, Hong |
author_facet | Li, Dingjie Wei, Shengtao Li, Tian Liu, Yang Cai, Jing Ge, Hong |
author_sort | Li, Dingjie |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To analyze the setup errors and residual errors of different spinal cord parts in esophageal cancer patients and to explore the necessity of spinal cord segmental expansion. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixty cases of esophageal cancer were included with 20 patients subdivided into the following groups: neck, chest and abdomen as per the treatment site. The patients underwent intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) between 2017 and 2019. Thermoplastic mask or vacuum bag were utilized for immobilization of different groups. CTVision (Siemens CT-On-Rail system) was used to acquire pre-treatment CT, and 20 consecutive pre-treatment CT datasets were collected for data analysis for each case. Images were exported to MIM (MIM Software Inc.) for processing and data analysis. Dice coefficient, maximum Hausdorff distance and centroid coordinate values between the spinal cord contours in the pre-treatment CTs and the planning CT were calculated and extracted. The contour expansion margin value is calculated as M(PRV) = 1.3 ∑ (total) + 0.5 σ (total), where ∑ (total) and σ (total) are the systematic and random error, respectively. RESULTS: For neck, chest, abdominal segments of the spinal cord, the mean Dice coefficients (± SD) are 0.73 ± 0.06, 0.80 ± 0.06, 0.82 ± 0.06, the maximum Hausdorff distance residual error (± SD) are 4.46 ± 0.55, 3.49 ± 0.53, 3.46 ± 0.69 mm, and the mean centroid coordinate residual error (± SD) are 2.40 ± 0.53, 1.66 ± 0.47, 2.14 ± 0.95 mm, respectively. The calculated margin using residual centroid method in medial-lateral (ML), anterior-posterior (AP), and cranial-caudal (CC) direction of spinal cord in neck, chest, abdominal segments are 3.86, 5.37, 6.36 mm, 3.45, 3.83, 4.51 mm, 4.05, 4.83, 7.06 mm, respectively, and the calculated margin using residual Hausdorff method are 3.10, 5.33 and 6.15 mm, 3.30, 3.77, 4.61 mm, 3.35, 4.76, 6.87 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: The setup errors and residual errors are different in each segment of the spinal cord. Different margins expansion should be applied to different segment of spinal cord. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8216358 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82163582021-06-30 Study of Spinal Cord Substructure Expansion Margin in Esophageal Cancer Li, Dingjie Wei, Shengtao Li, Tian Liu, Yang Cai, Jing Ge, Hong Technol Cancer Res Treat Original Article PURPOSE: To analyze the setup errors and residual errors of different spinal cord parts in esophageal cancer patients and to explore the necessity of spinal cord segmental expansion. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixty cases of esophageal cancer were included with 20 patients subdivided into the following groups: neck, chest and abdomen as per the treatment site. The patients underwent intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) between 2017 and 2019. Thermoplastic mask or vacuum bag were utilized for immobilization of different groups. CTVision (Siemens CT-On-Rail system) was used to acquire pre-treatment CT, and 20 consecutive pre-treatment CT datasets were collected for data analysis for each case. Images were exported to MIM (MIM Software Inc.) for processing and data analysis. Dice coefficient, maximum Hausdorff distance and centroid coordinate values between the spinal cord contours in the pre-treatment CTs and the planning CT were calculated and extracted. The contour expansion margin value is calculated as M(PRV) = 1.3 ∑ (total) + 0.5 σ (total), where ∑ (total) and σ (total) are the systematic and random error, respectively. RESULTS: For neck, chest, abdominal segments of the spinal cord, the mean Dice coefficients (± SD) are 0.73 ± 0.06, 0.80 ± 0.06, 0.82 ± 0.06, the maximum Hausdorff distance residual error (± SD) are 4.46 ± 0.55, 3.49 ± 0.53, 3.46 ± 0.69 mm, and the mean centroid coordinate residual error (± SD) are 2.40 ± 0.53, 1.66 ± 0.47, 2.14 ± 0.95 mm, respectively. The calculated margin using residual centroid method in medial-lateral (ML), anterior-posterior (AP), and cranial-caudal (CC) direction of spinal cord in neck, chest, abdominal segments are 3.86, 5.37, 6.36 mm, 3.45, 3.83, 4.51 mm, 4.05, 4.83, 7.06 mm, respectively, and the calculated margin using residual Hausdorff method are 3.10, 5.33 and 6.15 mm, 3.30, 3.77, 4.61 mm, 3.35, 4.76, 6.87 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: The setup errors and residual errors are different in each segment of the spinal cord. Different margins expansion should be applied to different segment of spinal cord. SAGE Publications 2021-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8216358/ /pubmed/34137317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338211024559 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Li, Dingjie Wei, Shengtao Li, Tian Liu, Yang Cai, Jing Ge, Hong Study of Spinal Cord Substructure Expansion Margin in Esophageal Cancer |
title | Study of Spinal Cord Substructure Expansion Margin in Esophageal Cancer |
title_full | Study of Spinal Cord Substructure Expansion Margin in Esophageal Cancer |
title_fullStr | Study of Spinal Cord Substructure Expansion Margin in Esophageal Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Study of Spinal Cord Substructure Expansion Margin in Esophageal Cancer |
title_short | Study of Spinal Cord Substructure Expansion Margin in Esophageal Cancer |
title_sort | study of spinal cord substructure expansion margin in esophageal cancer |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8216358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34137317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338211024559 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lidingjie studyofspinalcordsubstructureexpansionmargininesophagealcancer AT weishengtao studyofspinalcordsubstructureexpansionmargininesophagealcancer AT litian studyofspinalcordsubstructureexpansionmargininesophagealcancer AT liuyang studyofspinalcordsubstructureexpansionmargininesophagealcancer AT caijing studyofspinalcordsubstructureexpansionmargininesophagealcancer AT gehong studyofspinalcordsubstructureexpansionmargininesophagealcancer |