Cargando…

Study of Spinal Cord Substructure Expansion Margin in Esophageal Cancer

PURPOSE: To analyze the setup errors and residual errors of different spinal cord parts in esophageal cancer patients and to explore the necessity of spinal cord segmental expansion. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixty cases of esophageal cancer were included with 20 patients subdivided into the following...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Dingjie, Wei, Shengtao, Li, Tian, Liu, Yang, Cai, Jing, Ge, Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8216358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34137317
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338211024559
_version_ 1783710401538555904
author Li, Dingjie
Wei, Shengtao
Li, Tian
Liu, Yang
Cai, Jing
Ge, Hong
author_facet Li, Dingjie
Wei, Shengtao
Li, Tian
Liu, Yang
Cai, Jing
Ge, Hong
author_sort Li, Dingjie
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To analyze the setup errors and residual errors of different spinal cord parts in esophageal cancer patients and to explore the necessity of spinal cord segmental expansion. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixty cases of esophageal cancer were included with 20 patients subdivided into the following groups: neck, chest and abdomen as per the treatment site. The patients underwent intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) between 2017 and 2019. Thermoplastic mask or vacuum bag were utilized for immobilization of different groups. CTVision (Siemens CT-On-Rail system) was used to acquire pre-treatment CT, and 20 consecutive pre-treatment CT datasets were collected for data analysis for each case. Images were exported to MIM (MIM Software Inc.) for processing and data analysis. Dice coefficient, maximum Hausdorff distance and centroid coordinate values between the spinal cord contours in the pre-treatment CTs and the planning CT were calculated and extracted. The contour expansion margin value is calculated as M(PRV) = 1.3 ∑ (total) + 0.5 σ (total), where ∑ (total) and σ (total) are the systematic and random error, respectively. RESULTS: For neck, chest, abdominal segments of the spinal cord, the mean Dice coefficients (± SD) are 0.73 ± 0.06, 0.80 ± 0.06, 0.82 ± 0.06, the maximum Hausdorff distance residual error (± SD) are 4.46 ± 0.55, 3.49 ± 0.53, 3.46 ± 0.69 mm, and the mean centroid coordinate residual error (± SD) are 2.40 ± 0.53, 1.66 ± 0.47, 2.14 ± 0.95 mm, respectively. The calculated margin using residual centroid method in medial-lateral (ML), anterior-posterior (AP), and cranial-caudal (CC) direction of spinal cord in neck, chest, abdominal segments are 3.86, 5.37, 6.36 mm, 3.45, 3.83, 4.51 mm, 4.05, 4.83, 7.06 mm, respectively, and the calculated margin using residual Hausdorff method are 3.10, 5.33 and 6.15 mm, 3.30, 3.77, 4.61 mm, 3.35, 4.76, 6.87 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: The setup errors and residual errors are different in each segment of the spinal cord. Different margins expansion should be applied to different segment of spinal cord.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8216358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82163582021-06-30 Study of Spinal Cord Substructure Expansion Margin in Esophageal Cancer Li, Dingjie Wei, Shengtao Li, Tian Liu, Yang Cai, Jing Ge, Hong Technol Cancer Res Treat Original Article PURPOSE: To analyze the setup errors and residual errors of different spinal cord parts in esophageal cancer patients and to explore the necessity of spinal cord segmental expansion. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixty cases of esophageal cancer were included with 20 patients subdivided into the following groups: neck, chest and abdomen as per the treatment site. The patients underwent intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) between 2017 and 2019. Thermoplastic mask or vacuum bag were utilized for immobilization of different groups. CTVision (Siemens CT-On-Rail system) was used to acquire pre-treatment CT, and 20 consecutive pre-treatment CT datasets were collected for data analysis for each case. Images were exported to MIM (MIM Software Inc.) for processing and data analysis. Dice coefficient, maximum Hausdorff distance and centroid coordinate values between the spinal cord contours in the pre-treatment CTs and the planning CT were calculated and extracted. The contour expansion margin value is calculated as M(PRV) = 1.3 ∑ (total) + 0.5 σ (total), where ∑ (total) and σ (total) are the systematic and random error, respectively. RESULTS: For neck, chest, abdominal segments of the spinal cord, the mean Dice coefficients (± SD) are 0.73 ± 0.06, 0.80 ± 0.06, 0.82 ± 0.06, the maximum Hausdorff distance residual error (± SD) are 4.46 ± 0.55, 3.49 ± 0.53, 3.46 ± 0.69 mm, and the mean centroid coordinate residual error (± SD) are 2.40 ± 0.53, 1.66 ± 0.47, 2.14 ± 0.95 mm, respectively. The calculated margin using residual centroid method in medial-lateral (ML), anterior-posterior (AP), and cranial-caudal (CC) direction of spinal cord in neck, chest, abdominal segments are 3.86, 5.37, 6.36 mm, 3.45, 3.83, 4.51 mm, 4.05, 4.83, 7.06 mm, respectively, and the calculated margin using residual Hausdorff method are 3.10, 5.33 and 6.15 mm, 3.30, 3.77, 4.61 mm, 3.35, 4.76, 6.87 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: The setup errors and residual errors are different in each segment of the spinal cord. Different margins expansion should be applied to different segment of spinal cord. SAGE Publications 2021-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8216358/ /pubmed/34137317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338211024559 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Li, Dingjie
Wei, Shengtao
Li, Tian
Liu, Yang
Cai, Jing
Ge, Hong
Study of Spinal Cord Substructure Expansion Margin in Esophageal Cancer
title Study of Spinal Cord Substructure Expansion Margin in Esophageal Cancer
title_full Study of Spinal Cord Substructure Expansion Margin in Esophageal Cancer
title_fullStr Study of Spinal Cord Substructure Expansion Margin in Esophageal Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Study of Spinal Cord Substructure Expansion Margin in Esophageal Cancer
title_short Study of Spinal Cord Substructure Expansion Margin in Esophageal Cancer
title_sort study of spinal cord substructure expansion margin in esophageal cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8216358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34137317
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338211024559
work_keys_str_mv AT lidingjie studyofspinalcordsubstructureexpansionmargininesophagealcancer
AT weishengtao studyofspinalcordsubstructureexpansionmargininesophagealcancer
AT litian studyofspinalcordsubstructureexpansionmargininesophagealcancer
AT liuyang studyofspinalcordsubstructureexpansionmargininesophagealcancer
AT caijing studyofspinalcordsubstructureexpansionmargininesophagealcancer
AT gehong studyofspinalcordsubstructureexpansionmargininesophagealcancer