Cargando…

Techno-economic assessment at full scale of a biogas refinery plant receiving nitrogen rich feedstock and producing renewable energy and biobased fertilisers

Anaerobic digestion of nitrogen (N) rich substrates might be hindered when ammonia (NH(3)) formation reaches toxic levels for methanogenic microorganisms. One possible strategy to avoid inhibiting conditions is the removal of NH(3) from digestate by stripping and scrubbing technology and by recircul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brienza, C., Sigurnjak, I., Meier, T., Michels, E., Adani, F., Schoumans, O., Vaneeckhaute, C., Meers, E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8216695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34316100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127408
_version_ 1783710468277272576
author Brienza, C.
Sigurnjak, I.
Meier, T.
Michels, E.
Adani, F.
Schoumans, O.
Vaneeckhaute, C.
Meers, E.
author_facet Brienza, C.
Sigurnjak, I.
Meier, T.
Michels, E.
Adani, F.
Schoumans, O.
Vaneeckhaute, C.
Meers, E.
author_sort Brienza, C.
collection PubMed
description Anaerobic digestion of nitrogen (N) rich substrates might be hindered when ammonia (NH(3)) formation reaches toxic levels for methanogenic microorganisms. One possible strategy to avoid inhibiting conditions is the removal of NH(3) from digestate by stripping and scrubbing technology and by recirculating N depleted digestate back to the digester. This study aimed to i) monitor the performance (mass and energy balances) of a full scale digestate processing cascade that includes an innovative vacuum side stream NH(3)stripping and scrubbing system, ii) assess the production cost of ammonium sulphate (AS) solution and iii) evaluate its fertiliser quality. The use of gypsum to recover NH(3) in the scrubbing unit, instead of the more common sulphuric acid, results in the generation of AS and a fertilising liming substrate. Mass and nutrient balances indicated that 57% and 7.5% of ammonium N contained in digestate was recovered in the form of a 22% AS and liming substrate, respectively. The energy balance showed that about 3.8 kWh(el) and 59 kWh(th) were necessary to recover 1 kg of N in the form of AS. Furthermore, the production cost of AS, including both capital and operational costs, resulted to be 5.8 € t(−1) of digestate processed. According to the fertiliser quality assessment, this technology allows for the recovery of NH(3)in the form of salt solutions that can be utilised as a substitute for synthetic mineral nitrogen fertilisers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8216695
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82166952021-07-25 Techno-economic assessment at full scale of a biogas refinery plant receiving nitrogen rich feedstock and producing renewable energy and biobased fertilisers Brienza, C. Sigurnjak, I. Meier, T. Michels, E. Adani, F. Schoumans, O. Vaneeckhaute, C. Meers, E. J Clean Prod Article Anaerobic digestion of nitrogen (N) rich substrates might be hindered when ammonia (NH(3)) formation reaches toxic levels for methanogenic microorganisms. One possible strategy to avoid inhibiting conditions is the removal of NH(3) from digestate by stripping and scrubbing technology and by recirculating N depleted digestate back to the digester. This study aimed to i) monitor the performance (mass and energy balances) of a full scale digestate processing cascade that includes an innovative vacuum side stream NH(3)stripping and scrubbing system, ii) assess the production cost of ammonium sulphate (AS) solution and iii) evaluate its fertiliser quality. The use of gypsum to recover NH(3) in the scrubbing unit, instead of the more common sulphuric acid, results in the generation of AS and a fertilising liming substrate. Mass and nutrient balances indicated that 57% and 7.5% of ammonium N contained in digestate was recovered in the form of a 22% AS and liming substrate, respectively. The energy balance showed that about 3.8 kWh(el) and 59 kWh(th) were necessary to recover 1 kg of N in the form of AS. Furthermore, the production cost of AS, including both capital and operational costs, resulted to be 5.8 € t(−1) of digestate processed. According to the fertiliser quality assessment, this technology allows for the recovery of NH(3)in the form of salt solutions that can be utilised as a substitute for synthetic mineral nitrogen fertilisers. Elsevier Science 2021-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8216695/ /pubmed/34316100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127408 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Brienza, C.
Sigurnjak, I.
Meier, T.
Michels, E.
Adani, F.
Schoumans, O.
Vaneeckhaute, C.
Meers, E.
Techno-economic assessment at full scale of a biogas refinery plant receiving nitrogen rich feedstock and producing renewable energy and biobased fertilisers
title Techno-economic assessment at full scale of a biogas refinery plant receiving nitrogen rich feedstock and producing renewable energy and biobased fertilisers
title_full Techno-economic assessment at full scale of a biogas refinery plant receiving nitrogen rich feedstock and producing renewable energy and biobased fertilisers
title_fullStr Techno-economic assessment at full scale of a biogas refinery plant receiving nitrogen rich feedstock and producing renewable energy and biobased fertilisers
title_full_unstemmed Techno-economic assessment at full scale of a biogas refinery plant receiving nitrogen rich feedstock and producing renewable energy and biobased fertilisers
title_short Techno-economic assessment at full scale of a biogas refinery plant receiving nitrogen rich feedstock and producing renewable energy and biobased fertilisers
title_sort techno-economic assessment at full scale of a biogas refinery plant receiving nitrogen rich feedstock and producing renewable energy and biobased fertilisers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8216695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34316100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127408
work_keys_str_mv AT brienzac technoeconomicassessmentatfullscaleofabiogasrefineryplantreceivingnitrogenrichfeedstockandproducingrenewableenergyandbiobasedfertilisers
AT sigurnjaki technoeconomicassessmentatfullscaleofabiogasrefineryplantreceivingnitrogenrichfeedstockandproducingrenewableenergyandbiobasedfertilisers
AT meiert technoeconomicassessmentatfullscaleofabiogasrefineryplantreceivingnitrogenrichfeedstockandproducingrenewableenergyandbiobasedfertilisers
AT michelse technoeconomicassessmentatfullscaleofabiogasrefineryplantreceivingnitrogenrichfeedstockandproducingrenewableenergyandbiobasedfertilisers
AT adanif technoeconomicassessmentatfullscaleofabiogasrefineryplantreceivingnitrogenrichfeedstockandproducingrenewableenergyandbiobasedfertilisers
AT schoumanso technoeconomicassessmentatfullscaleofabiogasrefineryplantreceivingnitrogenrichfeedstockandproducingrenewableenergyandbiobasedfertilisers
AT vaneeckhautec technoeconomicassessmentatfullscaleofabiogasrefineryplantreceivingnitrogenrichfeedstockandproducingrenewableenergyandbiobasedfertilisers
AT meerse technoeconomicassessmentatfullscaleofabiogasrefineryplantreceivingnitrogenrichfeedstockandproducingrenewableenergyandbiobasedfertilisers