Cargando…

Analysis of Epidural Waveform to Determine Correct Epidural Catheter Placement After CSE Labor Analgesia

BACKGROUND: The epidural pressure is pulsatile and synchronized with arterial pulsations. Monitoring the epidural waveform has been suggested as a technique to reliably confirm the appropriate localization of the epidural catheter. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coccoluto, Alessandra, Capogna, Giorgio, Camorcia, Michela, Hochman, Mark, Velardo, Matteo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8216732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34168495
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S312194
_version_ 1783710476502302720
author Coccoluto, Alessandra
Capogna, Giorgio
Camorcia, Michela
Hochman, Mark
Velardo, Matteo
author_facet Coccoluto, Alessandra
Capogna, Giorgio
Camorcia, Michela
Hochman, Mark
Velardo, Matteo
author_sort Coccoluto, Alessandra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The epidural pressure is pulsatile and synchronized with arterial pulsations. Monitoring the epidural waveform has been suggested as a technique to reliably confirm the appropriate localization of the epidural catheter. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the Computer Controlled Drug Delivery System with continuous pressure and waveform sensing technology (CCDDS) (CompuFlo(®) CathCheck™) as an instrument to assess the correct placement of the catheter in the epidural space in parturients who have received combined spinal-epidural technique (CSE) for labor analgesia. METHODS: We enrolled 40 consecutive healthy patients undergoing CSE labor analgesia with successful analgesia. All the cases in which pulsatile waveforms in synchrony with heart rate were detected were considered to be true positives; all the cases in which there was the absence of pulsatile waves were followed up. If these patients had to eventually relocate or manipulate the epidural catheter, they were considered to be true negative. If the absence of pulse waves was observed in the presence of successful analgesia during labor, the patients were considered to be false negatives. RESULTS: Pulsatile waveforms synchronous with heart rate were observed in 33 cases associated with adequate analgesia. In 5 cases, the pulsatile waveforms were absent due to unilateral analgesia or catheter occlusion (true negatives). In 2 cases, the patients had effective analgesia but we were not able to observe a distinct pulsatile waveform. The pressure waveform analysis through the epidural catheter had a sensitivity of 95%, a positive predictive value of 100%, a specificity of 100% and a negative predictive value of 60%. CONCLUSION: Pulsatile pressure waveform recording with CCDDS through the epidural catheter resulted in high sensitivity and positive predictive value which can help the proper placement of the epidural catheter.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8216732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82167322021-06-23 Analysis of Epidural Waveform to Determine Correct Epidural Catheter Placement After CSE Labor Analgesia Coccoluto, Alessandra Capogna, Giorgio Camorcia, Michela Hochman, Mark Velardo, Matteo Local Reg Anesth Clinical Trial Report BACKGROUND: The epidural pressure is pulsatile and synchronized with arterial pulsations. Monitoring the epidural waveform has been suggested as a technique to reliably confirm the appropriate localization of the epidural catheter. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the Computer Controlled Drug Delivery System with continuous pressure and waveform sensing technology (CCDDS) (CompuFlo(®) CathCheck™) as an instrument to assess the correct placement of the catheter in the epidural space in parturients who have received combined spinal-epidural technique (CSE) for labor analgesia. METHODS: We enrolled 40 consecutive healthy patients undergoing CSE labor analgesia with successful analgesia. All the cases in which pulsatile waveforms in synchrony with heart rate were detected were considered to be true positives; all the cases in which there was the absence of pulsatile waves were followed up. If these patients had to eventually relocate or manipulate the epidural catheter, they were considered to be true negative. If the absence of pulse waves was observed in the presence of successful analgesia during labor, the patients were considered to be false negatives. RESULTS: Pulsatile waveforms synchronous with heart rate were observed in 33 cases associated with adequate analgesia. In 5 cases, the pulsatile waveforms were absent due to unilateral analgesia or catheter occlusion (true negatives). In 2 cases, the patients had effective analgesia but we were not able to observe a distinct pulsatile waveform. The pressure waveform analysis through the epidural catheter had a sensitivity of 95%, a positive predictive value of 100%, a specificity of 100% and a negative predictive value of 60%. CONCLUSION: Pulsatile pressure waveform recording with CCDDS through the epidural catheter resulted in high sensitivity and positive predictive value which can help the proper placement of the epidural catheter. Dove 2021-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8216732/ /pubmed/34168495 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S312194 Text en © 2021 Coccoluto et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Clinical Trial Report
Coccoluto, Alessandra
Capogna, Giorgio
Camorcia, Michela
Hochman, Mark
Velardo, Matteo
Analysis of Epidural Waveform to Determine Correct Epidural Catheter Placement After CSE Labor Analgesia
title Analysis of Epidural Waveform to Determine Correct Epidural Catheter Placement After CSE Labor Analgesia
title_full Analysis of Epidural Waveform to Determine Correct Epidural Catheter Placement After CSE Labor Analgesia
title_fullStr Analysis of Epidural Waveform to Determine Correct Epidural Catheter Placement After CSE Labor Analgesia
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Epidural Waveform to Determine Correct Epidural Catheter Placement After CSE Labor Analgesia
title_short Analysis of Epidural Waveform to Determine Correct Epidural Catheter Placement After CSE Labor Analgesia
title_sort analysis of epidural waveform to determine correct epidural catheter placement after cse labor analgesia
topic Clinical Trial Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8216732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34168495
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S312194
work_keys_str_mv AT coccolutoalessandra analysisofepiduralwaveformtodeterminecorrectepiduralcatheterplacementaftercselaboranalgesia
AT capognagiorgio analysisofepiduralwaveformtodeterminecorrectepiduralcatheterplacementaftercselaboranalgesia
AT camorciamichela analysisofepiduralwaveformtodeterminecorrectepiduralcatheterplacementaftercselaboranalgesia
AT hochmanmark analysisofepiduralwaveformtodeterminecorrectepiduralcatheterplacementaftercselaboranalgesia
AT velardomatteo analysisofepiduralwaveformtodeterminecorrectepiduralcatheterplacementaftercselaboranalgesia