Cargando…

Endoscopic band ligation in the treatment of gastric antral vascular ectasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and study aims  While argon plasma coagulation (APC) is the first-line treatment for gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE), endoscopic band ligation (EBL) has shown promising results. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCarty, Thomas R., Hathorn, Kelly E., Chan, Walter W., Jajoo, Kunal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8216786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34222641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1401-9880
_version_ 1783710488330240000
author McCarty, Thomas R.
Hathorn, Kelly E.
Chan, Walter W.
Jajoo, Kunal
author_facet McCarty, Thomas R.
Hathorn, Kelly E.
Chan, Walter W.
Jajoo, Kunal
author_sort McCarty, Thomas R.
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims  While argon plasma coagulation (APC) is the first-line treatment for gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE), endoscopic band ligation (EBL) has shown promising results. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of EBL for the treatment of GAVE. Methods  Individualized search strategies were developed in accordance with PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines through September 1, 2020. Measured outcomes included endoscopic success (defined as GAVE eradication/improvement), change in hemoglobin, transfusion dependency, number of treatment sessions, adverse events, rebleeding, and bleeding-associated mortality. Outcomes were compared among studies evaluating EBL versus APC. Results  Eleven studies (n = 393; 59.39 % female; mean age 58.65 ± 8.85 years) were included. Endoscopic success was achieved in 87.84 % [(95 % CI, 80.25 to 92.78); I (2)  = 11.96 %] with a mean number of 2.50 ± 0.49 treatment sessions and average of 12.40 ± 3.82 bands applied. For 8 studies comparing EBL (n = 143) versus APC (n = 174), there was no difference in baseline patient characteristics. However, endoscopic success was significantly higher for EBL [OR 6.04 (95 % CI 1.97 to 18.56; P  = 0.002], requiring fewer treatment sessions (2.56 ± 0.81 versus 3.78 ± 1.17; P  < 0.001). EBL was also associated with a greater increase in post-procedure hemoglobin [mean difference 0.35 (95 % CI 0.07 to 0.62; P  = 0.0140], greater reduction in transfusions required [mean difference –1.46 (95 % CI –2.80 to –0.12; P  = 0.033], and fewer rebleeding events [OR 0.11 (95 % CI, 0.04 to 0.36); P  < 0.001]. There was no difference in adverse events or bleeding-associated mortality ( P  > 0.050). Conclusions  EBL appears to be safe and effective for treatment of GAVE, with improved outcomes when compared to APC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8216786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82167862021-07-01 Endoscopic band ligation in the treatment of gastric antral vascular ectasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis McCarty, Thomas R. Hathorn, Kelly E. Chan, Walter W. Jajoo, Kunal Endosc Int Open Background and study aims  While argon plasma coagulation (APC) is the first-line treatment for gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE), endoscopic band ligation (EBL) has shown promising results. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of EBL for the treatment of GAVE. Methods  Individualized search strategies were developed in accordance with PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines through September 1, 2020. Measured outcomes included endoscopic success (defined as GAVE eradication/improvement), change in hemoglobin, transfusion dependency, number of treatment sessions, adverse events, rebleeding, and bleeding-associated mortality. Outcomes were compared among studies evaluating EBL versus APC. Results  Eleven studies (n = 393; 59.39 % female; mean age 58.65 ± 8.85 years) were included. Endoscopic success was achieved in 87.84 % [(95 % CI, 80.25 to 92.78); I (2)  = 11.96 %] with a mean number of 2.50 ± 0.49 treatment sessions and average of 12.40 ± 3.82 bands applied. For 8 studies comparing EBL (n = 143) versus APC (n = 174), there was no difference in baseline patient characteristics. However, endoscopic success was significantly higher for EBL [OR 6.04 (95 % CI 1.97 to 18.56; P  = 0.002], requiring fewer treatment sessions (2.56 ± 0.81 versus 3.78 ± 1.17; P  < 0.001). EBL was also associated with a greater increase in post-procedure hemoglobin [mean difference 0.35 (95 % CI 0.07 to 0.62; P  = 0.0140], greater reduction in transfusions required [mean difference –1.46 (95 % CI –2.80 to –0.12; P  = 0.033], and fewer rebleeding events [OR 0.11 (95 % CI, 0.04 to 0.36); P  < 0.001]. There was no difference in adverse events or bleeding-associated mortality ( P  > 0.050). Conclusions  EBL appears to be safe and effective for treatment of GAVE, with improved outcomes when compared to APC. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021-07 2021-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8216786/ /pubmed/34222641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1401-9880 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle McCarty, Thomas R.
Hathorn, Kelly E.
Chan, Walter W.
Jajoo, Kunal
Endoscopic band ligation in the treatment of gastric antral vascular ectasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Endoscopic band ligation in the treatment of gastric antral vascular ectasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Endoscopic band ligation in the treatment of gastric antral vascular ectasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Endoscopic band ligation in the treatment of gastric antral vascular ectasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic band ligation in the treatment of gastric antral vascular ectasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Endoscopic band ligation in the treatment of gastric antral vascular ectasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort endoscopic band ligation in the treatment of gastric antral vascular ectasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8216786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34222641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1401-9880
work_keys_str_mv AT mccartythomasr endoscopicbandligationinthetreatmentofgastricantralvascularectasiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hathornkellye endoscopicbandligationinthetreatmentofgastricantralvascularectasiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chanwalterw endoscopicbandligationinthetreatmentofgastricantralvascularectasiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jajookunal endoscopicbandligationinthetreatmentofgastricantralvascularectasiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis