Cargando…

End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Monitoring for Spontaneous Pneumothorax

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous pneumothorax should be classified as primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) or secondary spontaneous pneumothorax (SSP) because treatment strategies may differ depending on underlying lung conditions and clinical course. The pulmonary dysfunction can lead to changes in end-ti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Gyeong Min, Kim, Yong Won, Lee, Sanghun, Do, Han Ho, Seo, Jun Seok, Lee, Jeong Hun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8216832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34234966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9976543
_version_ 1783710498936586240
author Lee, Gyeong Min
Kim, Yong Won
Lee, Sanghun
Do, Han Ho
Seo, Jun Seok
Lee, Jeong Hun
author_facet Lee, Gyeong Min
Kim, Yong Won
Lee, Sanghun
Do, Han Ho
Seo, Jun Seok
Lee, Jeong Hun
author_sort Lee, Gyeong Min
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Spontaneous pneumothorax should be classified as primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) or secondary spontaneous pneumothorax (SSP) because treatment strategies may differ depending on underlying lung conditions and clinical course. The pulmonary dysfunction can lead to changes in end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO(2)). The aim of this study was to investigate the difference in ETCO(2) between PSP and SSP. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included adult patients diagnosed with spontaneous pneumothorax in the emergency room from April 2019 to September 2020. We divided patients into PSP and SSP groups and compared ETCO(2) variables between the two groups. RESULTS: There were 33 (66%) patients in the PSP group and 17 (34%) patients in the SSP group. Initial ETCO(2) was lower in the SSP group than in the PSP group (30 (23–33) vs. 35 (33–38) mmHg, p=0.002). Multivariate analysis revealed that respiratory gas associated with SSP was initial ETCO(2) (OR: 0.824; 95% CI: 0.697–0.974, p=0.023). The optimal cutoff for initial ETCO(2) to detection of SSP was 32 mmHg (area under curve, 0.754), with 76.5% sensitivity and 72.7% specificity. CONCLUSION: ETCO(2) monitoring is a reliable noninvasive indicator of differentiating between PSP and SSP. Initial ETCO(2) lower than 32 mmHg is a predictor of SSP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8216832
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82168322021-07-06 End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Monitoring for Spontaneous Pneumothorax Lee, Gyeong Min Kim, Yong Won Lee, Sanghun Do, Han Ho Seo, Jun Seok Lee, Jeong Hun Emerg Med Int Research Article BACKGROUND: Spontaneous pneumothorax should be classified as primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) or secondary spontaneous pneumothorax (SSP) because treatment strategies may differ depending on underlying lung conditions and clinical course. The pulmonary dysfunction can lead to changes in end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO(2)). The aim of this study was to investigate the difference in ETCO(2) between PSP and SSP. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included adult patients diagnosed with spontaneous pneumothorax in the emergency room from April 2019 to September 2020. We divided patients into PSP and SSP groups and compared ETCO(2) variables between the two groups. RESULTS: There were 33 (66%) patients in the PSP group and 17 (34%) patients in the SSP group. Initial ETCO(2) was lower in the SSP group than in the PSP group (30 (23–33) vs. 35 (33–38) mmHg, p=0.002). Multivariate analysis revealed that respiratory gas associated with SSP was initial ETCO(2) (OR: 0.824; 95% CI: 0.697–0.974, p=0.023). The optimal cutoff for initial ETCO(2) to detection of SSP was 32 mmHg (area under curve, 0.754), with 76.5% sensitivity and 72.7% specificity. CONCLUSION: ETCO(2) monitoring is a reliable noninvasive indicator of differentiating between PSP and SSP. Initial ETCO(2) lower than 32 mmHg is a predictor of SSP. Hindawi 2021-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8216832/ /pubmed/34234966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9976543 Text en Copyright © 2021 Gyeong Min Lee et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lee, Gyeong Min
Kim, Yong Won
Lee, Sanghun
Do, Han Ho
Seo, Jun Seok
Lee, Jeong Hun
End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Monitoring for Spontaneous Pneumothorax
title End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Monitoring for Spontaneous Pneumothorax
title_full End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Monitoring for Spontaneous Pneumothorax
title_fullStr End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Monitoring for Spontaneous Pneumothorax
title_full_unstemmed End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Monitoring for Spontaneous Pneumothorax
title_short End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Monitoring for Spontaneous Pneumothorax
title_sort end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring for spontaneous pneumothorax
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8216832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34234966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9976543
work_keys_str_mv AT leegyeongmin endtidalcarbondioxidemonitoringforspontaneouspneumothorax
AT kimyongwon endtidalcarbondioxidemonitoringforspontaneouspneumothorax
AT leesanghun endtidalcarbondioxidemonitoringforspontaneouspneumothorax
AT dohanho endtidalcarbondioxidemonitoringforspontaneouspneumothorax
AT seojunseok endtidalcarbondioxidemonitoringforspontaneouspneumothorax
AT leejeonghun endtidalcarbondioxidemonitoringforspontaneouspneumothorax