Cargando…
Environmental DNA metabarcoding primers for freshwater fish detection and quantification: In silico and in tanks
Environmental DNA (eDNA) techniques refer to utilizing the organisms’ DNA extracted from environment samples to genetically identify target species without capturing actual organisms. eDNA metabarcoding via high‐throughput sequencing can simultaneously detect multiple fish species from a single wate...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8216916/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34188886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7658 |
_version_ | 1783710517597044736 |
---|---|
author | Shu, Lu Ludwig, Arne Peng, Zuogang |
author_facet | Shu, Lu Ludwig, Arne Peng, Zuogang |
author_sort | Shu, Lu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Environmental DNA (eDNA) techniques refer to utilizing the organisms’ DNA extracted from environment samples to genetically identify target species without capturing actual organisms. eDNA metabarcoding via high‐throughput sequencing can simultaneously detect multiple fish species from a single water sample, which is a powerful tool for the qualitative detection and quantitative estimates of multiple fish species. However, sequence counts obtained from eDNA metabarcoding may be influenced by many factors, of which primer bias is one of the foremost causes of methodological error. The performance of 18 primer pairs for COI, cytb, 12S rRNA, and 16S rRNA mitochondrial genes, which are all frequently used in fish eDNA metabarcoding, were evaluated in the current study. The ribosomal gene markers performed better than the protein‐coding gene markers during in silico screening, resulting in higher taxonomic coverage and appropriate barcode lengths. Four primer pairs—AcMDB07, MiFish‐U, Ve16S1, and Ve16S3—designed for various regions of the 12S and 16S rRNA genes were screened for tank metabarcoding in a case study targeting six freshwater fish species. The four primer pairs were able to accurately detect all six species in different tanks, while only MiFish‐U, Ve16S1, and Ve16S3 revealed a significant positive relationship between species biomass and read count for the pooled tank data. The positive relationship could not be found in all species within the tanks. Additionally, primer efficiency differed depending on the species while primer preferential species varied in different fish assemblages. This case study supports the potential for eDNA metabarcoding to assess species diversity in natural ecosystems and provides an alternative strategy to evaluate the performance of candidate primers before application of eDNA metabarcoding in natural ecosystems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8216916 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82169162021-06-28 Environmental DNA metabarcoding primers for freshwater fish detection and quantification: In silico and in tanks Shu, Lu Ludwig, Arne Peng, Zuogang Ecol Evol Original Research Environmental DNA (eDNA) techniques refer to utilizing the organisms’ DNA extracted from environment samples to genetically identify target species without capturing actual organisms. eDNA metabarcoding via high‐throughput sequencing can simultaneously detect multiple fish species from a single water sample, which is a powerful tool for the qualitative detection and quantitative estimates of multiple fish species. However, sequence counts obtained from eDNA metabarcoding may be influenced by many factors, of which primer bias is one of the foremost causes of methodological error. The performance of 18 primer pairs for COI, cytb, 12S rRNA, and 16S rRNA mitochondrial genes, which are all frequently used in fish eDNA metabarcoding, were evaluated in the current study. The ribosomal gene markers performed better than the protein‐coding gene markers during in silico screening, resulting in higher taxonomic coverage and appropriate barcode lengths. Four primer pairs—AcMDB07, MiFish‐U, Ve16S1, and Ve16S3—designed for various regions of the 12S and 16S rRNA genes were screened for tank metabarcoding in a case study targeting six freshwater fish species. The four primer pairs were able to accurately detect all six species in different tanks, while only MiFish‐U, Ve16S1, and Ve16S3 revealed a significant positive relationship between species biomass and read count for the pooled tank data. The positive relationship could not be found in all species within the tanks. Additionally, primer efficiency differed depending on the species while primer preferential species varied in different fish assemblages. This case study supports the potential for eDNA metabarcoding to assess species diversity in natural ecosystems and provides an alternative strategy to evaluate the performance of candidate primers before application of eDNA metabarcoding in natural ecosystems. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8216916/ /pubmed/34188886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7658 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Shu, Lu Ludwig, Arne Peng, Zuogang Environmental DNA metabarcoding primers for freshwater fish detection and quantification: In silico and in tanks |
title | Environmental DNA metabarcoding primers for freshwater fish detection and quantification: In silico and in tanks |
title_full | Environmental DNA metabarcoding primers for freshwater fish detection and quantification: In silico and in tanks |
title_fullStr | Environmental DNA metabarcoding primers for freshwater fish detection and quantification: In silico and in tanks |
title_full_unstemmed | Environmental DNA metabarcoding primers for freshwater fish detection and quantification: In silico and in tanks |
title_short | Environmental DNA metabarcoding primers for freshwater fish detection and quantification: In silico and in tanks |
title_sort | environmental dna metabarcoding primers for freshwater fish detection and quantification: in silico and in tanks |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8216916/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34188886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7658 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shulu environmentaldnametabarcodingprimersforfreshwaterfishdetectionandquantificationinsilicoandintanks AT ludwigarne environmentaldnametabarcodingprimersforfreshwaterfishdetectionandquantificationinsilicoandintanks AT pengzuogang environmentaldnametabarcodingprimersforfreshwaterfishdetectionandquantificationinsilicoandintanks |