Cargando…
Enhancing flowering plant functional richness improves wild bee diversity in vineyard inter‐rows in different floral kingdoms
Wild bees are threatened by multiple interacting stressors, such as habitat loss, land use change, parasites, and pathogens. However, vineyards with vegetated inter‐rows can offer high floral resources within viticultural landscapes and provide foraging and nesting habitats for wild bees. Here, we a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8216979/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34188862 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7623 |
_version_ | 1783710532465852416 |
---|---|
author | Kratschmer, Sophie Pachinger, Bärbel Gaigher, René Pryke, James S. van Schalkwyk, Julia Samways, Michael J. Melin, Annalie Kehinde, Temitope Zaller, Johann G. Winter, Silvia |
author_facet | Kratschmer, Sophie Pachinger, Bärbel Gaigher, René Pryke, James S. van Schalkwyk, Julia Samways, Michael J. Melin, Annalie Kehinde, Temitope Zaller, Johann G. Winter, Silvia |
author_sort | Kratschmer, Sophie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Wild bees are threatened by multiple interacting stressors, such as habitat loss, land use change, parasites, and pathogens. However, vineyards with vegetated inter‐rows can offer high floral resources within viticultural landscapes and provide foraging and nesting habitats for wild bees. Here, we assess how vineyard management regimes (organic vs. conventional; inter‐row vegetation management) and landscape composition determine the inter‐row plant and wild bee assemblages, as well as how these variables relate to functional traits in 24 Austrian and 10 South African vineyards. Vineyards had either permanent vegetation cover in untilled inter‐rows or temporary vegetation cover in infrequently tilled inter‐rows. Proportion of seminatural habitats (e.g., fallows, grassland, field margins) and woody structures (e.g., woodlots, single trees, tree rows) were used as proxies for landscape composition and mapped within 500‐m radius around the study vineyards. Organic vineyard management increased functional richness (FRic) of wild bees and flowering plants, with woody structures marginally increasing species richness and FRic of wild bees. Wild bee and floral traits were differently associated across the countries. In Austria, several bee traits (e.g., lecty, pollen collection type, proboscis length) were associated with flower color and symmetry, while in South African vineyards, only bees’ proboscis length was positively correlated with floral traits characteristic of Asteraceae flowers (e.g., ray–disk morphology, yellow colors). Solitary bee species in Austria benefitted from infrequent tillage, while ground nesting species preferred inter‐rows with undisturbed soils. Higher proportions of woody structures in surrounding landscapes resulted in less solitary and corbiculate bees in Austria, but more aboveground nesting species in South Africa. In both countries, associations between FRic of wild bees and flowering plants were positive both in organic and in conventional vineyards. We recommend the use of diverse cover crop seed mixtures to enhance plant flowering diversity in inter‐rows, to increase wild bee richness in viticultural landscapes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8216979 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82169792021-06-28 Enhancing flowering plant functional richness improves wild bee diversity in vineyard inter‐rows in different floral kingdoms Kratschmer, Sophie Pachinger, Bärbel Gaigher, René Pryke, James S. van Schalkwyk, Julia Samways, Michael J. Melin, Annalie Kehinde, Temitope Zaller, Johann G. Winter, Silvia Ecol Evol Original Research Wild bees are threatened by multiple interacting stressors, such as habitat loss, land use change, parasites, and pathogens. However, vineyards with vegetated inter‐rows can offer high floral resources within viticultural landscapes and provide foraging and nesting habitats for wild bees. Here, we assess how vineyard management regimes (organic vs. conventional; inter‐row vegetation management) and landscape composition determine the inter‐row plant and wild bee assemblages, as well as how these variables relate to functional traits in 24 Austrian and 10 South African vineyards. Vineyards had either permanent vegetation cover in untilled inter‐rows or temporary vegetation cover in infrequently tilled inter‐rows. Proportion of seminatural habitats (e.g., fallows, grassland, field margins) and woody structures (e.g., woodlots, single trees, tree rows) were used as proxies for landscape composition and mapped within 500‐m radius around the study vineyards. Organic vineyard management increased functional richness (FRic) of wild bees and flowering plants, with woody structures marginally increasing species richness and FRic of wild bees. Wild bee and floral traits were differently associated across the countries. In Austria, several bee traits (e.g., lecty, pollen collection type, proboscis length) were associated with flower color and symmetry, while in South African vineyards, only bees’ proboscis length was positively correlated with floral traits characteristic of Asteraceae flowers (e.g., ray–disk morphology, yellow colors). Solitary bee species in Austria benefitted from infrequent tillage, while ground nesting species preferred inter‐rows with undisturbed soils. Higher proportions of woody structures in surrounding landscapes resulted in less solitary and corbiculate bees in Austria, but more aboveground nesting species in South Africa. In both countries, associations between FRic of wild bees and flowering plants were positive both in organic and in conventional vineyards. We recommend the use of diverse cover crop seed mixtures to enhance plant flowering diversity in inter‐rows, to increase wild bee richness in viticultural landscapes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8216979/ /pubmed/34188862 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7623 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Kratschmer, Sophie Pachinger, Bärbel Gaigher, René Pryke, James S. van Schalkwyk, Julia Samways, Michael J. Melin, Annalie Kehinde, Temitope Zaller, Johann G. Winter, Silvia Enhancing flowering plant functional richness improves wild bee diversity in vineyard inter‐rows in different floral kingdoms |
title | Enhancing flowering plant functional richness improves wild bee diversity in vineyard inter‐rows in different floral kingdoms |
title_full | Enhancing flowering plant functional richness improves wild bee diversity in vineyard inter‐rows in different floral kingdoms |
title_fullStr | Enhancing flowering plant functional richness improves wild bee diversity in vineyard inter‐rows in different floral kingdoms |
title_full_unstemmed | Enhancing flowering plant functional richness improves wild bee diversity in vineyard inter‐rows in different floral kingdoms |
title_short | Enhancing flowering plant functional richness improves wild bee diversity in vineyard inter‐rows in different floral kingdoms |
title_sort | enhancing flowering plant functional richness improves wild bee diversity in vineyard inter‐rows in different floral kingdoms |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8216979/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34188862 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7623 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kratschmersophie enhancingfloweringplantfunctionalrichnessimproveswildbeediversityinvineyardinterrowsindifferentfloralkingdoms AT pachingerbarbel enhancingfloweringplantfunctionalrichnessimproveswildbeediversityinvineyardinterrowsindifferentfloralkingdoms AT gaigherrene enhancingfloweringplantfunctionalrichnessimproveswildbeediversityinvineyardinterrowsindifferentfloralkingdoms AT prykejamess enhancingfloweringplantfunctionalrichnessimproveswildbeediversityinvineyardinterrowsindifferentfloralkingdoms AT vanschalkwykjulia enhancingfloweringplantfunctionalrichnessimproveswildbeediversityinvineyardinterrowsindifferentfloralkingdoms AT samwaysmichaelj enhancingfloweringplantfunctionalrichnessimproveswildbeediversityinvineyardinterrowsindifferentfloralkingdoms AT melinannalie enhancingfloweringplantfunctionalrichnessimproveswildbeediversityinvineyardinterrowsindifferentfloralkingdoms AT kehindetemitope enhancingfloweringplantfunctionalrichnessimproveswildbeediversityinvineyardinterrowsindifferentfloralkingdoms AT zallerjohanng enhancingfloweringplantfunctionalrichnessimproveswildbeediversityinvineyardinterrowsindifferentfloralkingdoms AT wintersilvia enhancingfloweringplantfunctionalrichnessimproveswildbeediversityinvineyardinterrowsindifferentfloralkingdoms |