Cargando…

Enhancing flowering plant functional richness improves wild bee diversity in vineyard inter‐rows in different floral kingdoms

Wild bees are threatened by multiple interacting stressors, such as habitat loss, land use change, parasites, and pathogens. However, vineyards with vegetated inter‐rows can offer high floral resources within viticultural landscapes and provide foraging and nesting habitats for wild bees. Here, we a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kratschmer, Sophie, Pachinger, Bärbel, Gaigher, René, Pryke, James S., van Schalkwyk, Julia, Samways, Michael J., Melin, Annalie, Kehinde, Temitope, Zaller, Johann G., Winter, Silvia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8216979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34188862
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7623
_version_ 1783710532465852416
author Kratschmer, Sophie
Pachinger, Bärbel
Gaigher, René
Pryke, James S.
van Schalkwyk, Julia
Samways, Michael J.
Melin, Annalie
Kehinde, Temitope
Zaller, Johann G.
Winter, Silvia
author_facet Kratschmer, Sophie
Pachinger, Bärbel
Gaigher, René
Pryke, James S.
van Schalkwyk, Julia
Samways, Michael J.
Melin, Annalie
Kehinde, Temitope
Zaller, Johann G.
Winter, Silvia
author_sort Kratschmer, Sophie
collection PubMed
description Wild bees are threatened by multiple interacting stressors, such as habitat loss, land use change, parasites, and pathogens. However, vineyards with vegetated inter‐rows can offer high floral resources within viticultural landscapes and provide foraging and nesting habitats for wild bees. Here, we assess how vineyard management regimes (organic vs. conventional; inter‐row vegetation management) and landscape composition determine the inter‐row plant and wild bee assemblages, as well as how these variables relate to functional traits in 24 Austrian and 10 South African vineyards. Vineyards had either permanent vegetation cover in untilled inter‐rows or temporary vegetation cover in infrequently tilled inter‐rows. Proportion of seminatural habitats (e.g., fallows, grassland, field margins) and woody structures (e.g., woodlots, single trees, tree rows) were used as proxies for landscape composition and mapped within 500‐m radius around the study vineyards. Organic vineyard management increased functional richness (FRic) of wild bees and flowering plants, with woody structures marginally increasing species richness and FRic of wild bees. Wild bee and floral traits were differently associated across the countries. In Austria, several bee traits (e.g., lecty, pollen collection type, proboscis length) were associated with flower color and symmetry, while in South African vineyards, only bees’ proboscis length was positively correlated with floral traits characteristic of Asteraceae flowers (e.g., ray–disk morphology, yellow colors). Solitary bee species in Austria benefitted from infrequent tillage, while ground nesting species preferred inter‐rows with undisturbed soils. Higher proportions of woody structures in surrounding landscapes resulted in less solitary and corbiculate bees in Austria, but more aboveground nesting species in South Africa. In both countries, associations between FRic of wild bees and flowering plants were positive both in organic and in conventional vineyards. We recommend the use of diverse cover crop seed mixtures to enhance plant flowering diversity in inter‐rows, to increase wild bee richness in viticultural landscapes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8216979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82169792021-06-28 Enhancing flowering plant functional richness improves wild bee diversity in vineyard inter‐rows in different floral kingdoms Kratschmer, Sophie Pachinger, Bärbel Gaigher, René Pryke, James S. van Schalkwyk, Julia Samways, Michael J. Melin, Annalie Kehinde, Temitope Zaller, Johann G. Winter, Silvia Ecol Evol Original Research Wild bees are threatened by multiple interacting stressors, such as habitat loss, land use change, parasites, and pathogens. However, vineyards with vegetated inter‐rows can offer high floral resources within viticultural landscapes and provide foraging and nesting habitats for wild bees. Here, we assess how vineyard management regimes (organic vs. conventional; inter‐row vegetation management) and landscape composition determine the inter‐row plant and wild bee assemblages, as well as how these variables relate to functional traits in 24 Austrian and 10 South African vineyards. Vineyards had either permanent vegetation cover in untilled inter‐rows or temporary vegetation cover in infrequently tilled inter‐rows. Proportion of seminatural habitats (e.g., fallows, grassland, field margins) and woody structures (e.g., woodlots, single trees, tree rows) were used as proxies for landscape composition and mapped within 500‐m radius around the study vineyards. Organic vineyard management increased functional richness (FRic) of wild bees and flowering plants, with woody structures marginally increasing species richness and FRic of wild bees. Wild bee and floral traits were differently associated across the countries. In Austria, several bee traits (e.g., lecty, pollen collection type, proboscis length) were associated with flower color and symmetry, while in South African vineyards, only bees’ proboscis length was positively correlated with floral traits characteristic of Asteraceae flowers (e.g., ray–disk morphology, yellow colors). Solitary bee species in Austria benefitted from infrequent tillage, while ground nesting species preferred inter‐rows with undisturbed soils. Higher proportions of woody structures in surrounding landscapes resulted in less solitary and corbiculate bees in Austria, but more aboveground nesting species in South Africa. In both countries, associations between FRic of wild bees and flowering plants were positive both in organic and in conventional vineyards. We recommend the use of diverse cover crop seed mixtures to enhance plant flowering diversity in inter‐rows, to increase wild bee richness in viticultural landscapes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8216979/ /pubmed/34188862 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7623 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kratschmer, Sophie
Pachinger, Bärbel
Gaigher, René
Pryke, James S.
van Schalkwyk, Julia
Samways, Michael J.
Melin, Annalie
Kehinde, Temitope
Zaller, Johann G.
Winter, Silvia
Enhancing flowering plant functional richness improves wild bee diversity in vineyard inter‐rows in different floral kingdoms
title Enhancing flowering plant functional richness improves wild bee diversity in vineyard inter‐rows in different floral kingdoms
title_full Enhancing flowering plant functional richness improves wild bee diversity in vineyard inter‐rows in different floral kingdoms
title_fullStr Enhancing flowering plant functional richness improves wild bee diversity in vineyard inter‐rows in different floral kingdoms
title_full_unstemmed Enhancing flowering plant functional richness improves wild bee diversity in vineyard inter‐rows in different floral kingdoms
title_short Enhancing flowering plant functional richness improves wild bee diversity in vineyard inter‐rows in different floral kingdoms
title_sort enhancing flowering plant functional richness improves wild bee diversity in vineyard inter‐rows in different floral kingdoms
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8216979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34188862
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7623
work_keys_str_mv AT kratschmersophie enhancingfloweringplantfunctionalrichnessimproveswildbeediversityinvineyardinterrowsindifferentfloralkingdoms
AT pachingerbarbel enhancingfloweringplantfunctionalrichnessimproveswildbeediversityinvineyardinterrowsindifferentfloralkingdoms
AT gaigherrene enhancingfloweringplantfunctionalrichnessimproveswildbeediversityinvineyardinterrowsindifferentfloralkingdoms
AT prykejamess enhancingfloweringplantfunctionalrichnessimproveswildbeediversityinvineyardinterrowsindifferentfloralkingdoms
AT vanschalkwykjulia enhancingfloweringplantfunctionalrichnessimproveswildbeediversityinvineyardinterrowsindifferentfloralkingdoms
AT samwaysmichaelj enhancingfloweringplantfunctionalrichnessimproveswildbeediversityinvineyardinterrowsindifferentfloralkingdoms
AT melinannalie enhancingfloweringplantfunctionalrichnessimproveswildbeediversityinvineyardinterrowsindifferentfloralkingdoms
AT kehindetemitope enhancingfloweringplantfunctionalrichnessimproveswildbeediversityinvineyardinterrowsindifferentfloralkingdoms
AT zallerjohanng enhancingfloweringplantfunctionalrichnessimproveswildbeediversityinvineyardinterrowsindifferentfloralkingdoms
AT wintersilvia enhancingfloweringplantfunctionalrichnessimproveswildbeediversityinvineyardinterrowsindifferentfloralkingdoms