Cargando…

Retractions, Fake Peer Reviews, and Paper Mills

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Rivera, Horacio, Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:	Opinion
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8216989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34155837 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e165

Ejemplares similares

Fake Peer Review and Inappropriate Authorship Are Real Evils
por: Rivera, Horacio
Publicado: (2018)

Fake science for sale? How Endocrine Connections is tackling paper mills
por: Clark, Adrian J L, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Accelerated Peer Review and Paper Processing Models in Academic Publishing
por: Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Paper mills and on-demand publishing: Risks to the integrity of journal indexing and metrics
por: Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A.
Publicado: (2021)

Retraction of a peer reviewed article suggests ongoing problems with Australian forensic science
por: Brook, Chris, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Optimizing peer review to minimize the risk of retracting COVID-19-related literature
por: Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Retracted papers originating from paper mills: cross sectional study
por: Candal-Pedreira, Cristina, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Why training and specialization is needed for peer review: a case study of peer review for randomized controlled trials
por: Patel, Jigisha
Publicado: (2014)

Editors and Authors of Medical Journals Should Be Mindful of the New ICMJE Disclosure Form and Updated Policies
por: Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Inappropriate Authorship and Kinship in Research Evaluation
por: Rivera, Horacio
Publicado: (2018)

Editorial Abuses
por: Rivera, Horacio
Publicado: (2017)

Two changes that may help to improve NIH peer review
por: Aslin, Richard N.
Publicado: (2022)

On the pitfalls of peer review
por: van Gunsteren, Wilfred
Publicado: (2015)

Further peer review failures
por: Rivera, Horacio
Publicado: (2011)

Publishing peer review materials
por: Beck, Jeffrey, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Pest categorisation of non‐EU viruses and viroids of Cydonia Mill., Malus Mill. and Pyrus L.
por: Bragard, Claude, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Peer review practicalities in clinical medicine
por: Metcalfe, Matthew J, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Double Anonymity and the Peer Review Process
por: Brown, Richard J.C.
Publicado: (2006)

Ten considerations for open peer review
por: Schmidt, Birgit, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The Role of Publons in the Context of Open Peer Review
por: Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

On the fakeness of fake supergravity
por: Celi, A, et al.
Publicado: (2004)

The need for post-publication peer review in plant science publishing
por: Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A.
Publicado: (2013)

Prejudice, Interests, Jealousy: Inappropriate Peer Reviewers May Be Exacerbating Inequality in Academic Publication in Health Research
por: Hu, Xiaojing
Publicado: (2023)

An Opinion Paper on Aerogels for Biomedical and Environmental Applications
por: García-González, Carlos A., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Ethical Reviewers are Essential for Scholarly Journals for Timely Processing of Submissions and Avoiding Retractions
por: Mehregan, Mina
Publicado: (2019)

Indico Paper Peer Reviewing
por: Ciabini, Luca, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Grant writing and grant peer review as questionable research practices
por: Conix, Stijn, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Rewarding the quantity of peer review could harm biomedical research
por: Al-Khatib, Aceil, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

“Fake Tan” or “Fake News”?
por: Meyer, Georg, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Research education in Europe: an opinion paper by the European Society of Radiology
Publicado: (2015)

AI-generated research paper fabrication and plagiarism in the scientific community
por: Elali, Faisal R., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

List of non‐EU phytoplasmas of Cydonia Mill., Fragaria L., Malus Mill., Prunus L., Pyrus L., Ribes L., Rubus L. and Vitis L.
por: Bragard, Claude, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Pest categorisation of the non‐EU phytoplasmas of Cydonia Mill., Fragaria L., Malus Mill., Prunus L., Pyrus L., Ribes L., Rubus L. and Vitis L.
por: Bragard, Claude, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

List of non‐EU viruses and viroids of Cydonia Mill., Fragaria L., Malus Mill., Prunus L., Pyrus L., Ribes L., Rubus L. and Vitis L.
por: Bragard, Claude, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Peer reviewing an original research paper
por: Tullu, MS, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Fighting the Fake: A Forensic Linguistic Analysis to Fake News Detection
por: Sousa-Silva, Rui
Publicado: (2022)

Time to consider ovarian tissue cryopreservation for girls with Turner’s syndrome: an opinion paper
por: Jeve, Yadava Bapurao, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Publishing a Paper during Residency for Specialists: How Should We Deal with It?
por: Matsubara, Shigeki, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Teaching and learning based on peer review: a realistic approach in forensic sciences
por: Dinis-Oliveira, Ricardo Jorge, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Retraction: Biodegradation of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals and Residual Organic Pollutants of Pulp and Paper Mill Effluent by Biostimulation
Publicado: (2021)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_ft6s0m1edfud0bn4s0l9fig2m0