Cargando…

Consultation on kidney stones, Copenhagen 2019: lithotripsy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the balance between existing evidence and expert opinions on the safety and efficacy of new technological improvements in lithotripsy techniques for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHODS: A scoping review approach was applied to search literature in Pubmed, Embase, and We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Axelsson, Tomas Andri, Cracco, Cecilia, Desai, Mahesh, Hasan, Mudhar Nazar, Knoll, Thomas, Montanari, Emanuele, Pérez-Fentes, Daniel, Straub, Michael, Thomas, Kay, Williams, James C., Brehmer, Marianne, Osther, Palle J. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8217030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32728884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03383-w
_version_ 1783710543921545216
author Axelsson, Tomas Andri
Cracco, Cecilia
Desai, Mahesh
Hasan, Mudhar Nazar
Knoll, Thomas
Montanari, Emanuele
Pérez-Fentes, Daniel
Straub, Michael
Thomas, Kay
Williams, James C.
Brehmer, Marianne
Osther, Palle J. S.
author_facet Axelsson, Tomas Andri
Cracco, Cecilia
Desai, Mahesh
Hasan, Mudhar Nazar
Knoll, Thomas
Montanari, Emanuele
Pérez-Fentes, Daniel
Straub, Michael
Thomas, Kay
Williams, James C.
Brehmer, Marianne
Osther, Palle J. S.
author_sort Axelsson, Tomas Andri
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the balance between existing evidence and expert opinions on the safety and efficacy of new technological improvements in lithotripsy techniques for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHODS: A scoping review approach was applied to search literature in Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science. Consensus by key opinion leaders was reached at a 2-day meeting entitled “Consultation on Kidney Stones: Aspects of Intracorporeal Lithotripsy” held in Copenhagen, Denmark, in September 2019. RESULTS: New-generation dual-mode single-probe lithotripsy devices have shown favourable results compared with use of ballistic or ultrasonic lithotripters only. However, ballistic and ultrasonic lithotripters are also highly effective and safe and have been the backbone of PCNL for many years. Compared with standard PCNL, it seems that mini PCNL is associated with fewer bleeding complications and shorter hospital admissions, but also with longer operating room (OR) time and higher intrarenal pressure. Use of laser lithotripsy combined with suction in mini PCNL is a promising alternative that may improve such PCNL by shortening OR times. Furthermore, supine PCNL is a good alternative, especially in cases with complex renal stones and large proximal ureteric stones; in addition, it facilitates endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS). CONCLUSION: Recent technological improvements in PCNL techniques are promising, but there is a lack of high-level evidence on safety and efficacy. Different techniques suit different types of stones and patients. The evolution of diverse methods has given urologists the possibility of a personalized stone approach, in other words, the right approach for the right patient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8217030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82170302021-07-09 Consultation on kidney stones, Copenhagen 2019: lithotripsy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy Axelsson, Tomas Andri Cracco, Cecilia Desai, Mahesh Hasan, Mudhar Nazar Knoll, Thomas Montanari, Emanuele Pérez-Fentes, Daniel Straub, Michael Thomas, Kay Williams, James C. Brehmer, Marianne Osther, Palle J. S. World J Urol Topic Paper PURPOSE: To evaluate the balance between existing evidence and expert opinions on the safety and efficacy of new technological improvements in lithotripsy techniques for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHODS: A scoping review approach was applied to search literature in Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science. Consensus by key opinion leaders was reached at a 2-day meeting entitled “Consultation on Kidney Stones: Aspects of Intracorporeal Lithotripsy” held in Copenhagen, Denmark, in September 2019. RESULTS: New-generation dual-mode single-probe lithotripsy devices have shown favourable results compared with use of ballistic or ultrasonic lithotripters only. However, ballistic and ultrasonic lithotripters are also highly effective and safe and have been the backbone of PCNL for many years. Compared with standard PCNL, it seems that mini PCNL is associated with fewer bleeding complications and shorter hospital admissions, but also with longer operating room (OR) time and higher intrarenal pressure. Use of laser lithotripsy combined with suction in mini PCNL is a promising alternative that may improve such PCNL by shortening OR times. Furthermore, supine PCNL is a good alternative, especially in cases with complex renal stones and large proximal ureteric stones; in addition, it facilitates endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS). CONCLUSION: Recent technological improvements in PCNL techniques are promising, but there is a lack of high-level evidence on safety and efficacy. Different techniques suit different types of stones and patients. The evolution of diverse methods has given urologists the possibility of a personalized stone approach, in other words, the right approach for the right patient. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-07-29 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8217030/ /pubmed/32728884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03383-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020, corrected publication 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Topic Paper
Axelsson, Tomas Andri
Cracco, Cecilia
Desai, Mahesh
Hasan, Mudhar Nazar
Knoll, Thomas
Montanari, Emanuele
Pérez-Fentes, Daniel
Straub, Michael
Thomas, Kay
Williams, James C.
Brehmer, Marianne
Osther, Palle J. S.
Consultation on kidney stones, Copenhagen 2019: lithotripsy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title Consultation on kidney stones, Copenhagen 2019: lithotripsy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_full Consultation on kidney stones, Copenhagen 2019: lithotripsy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_fullStr Consultation on kidney stones, Copenhagen 2019: lithotripsy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_full_unstemmed Consultation on kidney stones, Copenhagen 2019: lithotripsy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_short Consultation on kidney stones, Copenhagen 2019: lithotripsy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_sort consultation on kidney stones, copenhagen 2019: lithotripsy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy
topic Topic Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8217030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32728884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03383-w
work_keys_str_mv AT axelssontomasandri consultationonkidneystonescopenhagen2019lithotripsyinpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT craccocecilia consultationonkidneystonescopenhagen2019lithotripsyinpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT desaimahesh consultationonkidneystonescopenhagen2019lithotripsyinpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT hasanmudharnazar consultationonkidneystonescopenhagen2019lithotripsyinpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT knollthomas consultationonkidneystonescopenhagen2019lithotripsyinpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT montanariemanuele consultationonkidneystonescopenhagen2019lithotripsyinpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT perezfentesdaniel consultationonkidneystonescopenhagen2019lithotripsyinpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT straubmichael consultationonkidneystonescopenhagen2019lithotripsyinpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT thomaskay consultationonkidneystonescopenhagen2019lithotripsyinpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT williamsjamesc consultationonkidneystonescopenhagen2019lithotripsyinpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT brehmermarianne consultationonkidneystonescopenhagen2019lithotripsyinpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT ostherpallejs consultationonkidneystonescopenhagen2019lithotripsyinpercutaneousnephrolithotomy