Cargando…
Consultation on kidney stones, Copenhagen 2019: lithotripsy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy
PURPOSE: To evaluate the balance between existing evidence and expert opinions on the safety and efficacy of new technological improvements in lithotripsy techniques for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHODS: A scoping review approach was applied to search literature in Pubmed, Embase, and We...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8217030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32728884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03383-w |
_version_ | 1783710543921545216 |
---|---|
author | Axelsson, Tomas Andri Cracco, Cecilia Desai, Mahesh Hasan, Mudhar Nazar Knoll, Thomas Montanari, Emanuele Pérez-Fentes, Daniel Straub, Michael Thomas, Kay Williams, James C. Brehmer, Marianne Osther, Palle J. S. |
author_facet | Axelsson, Tomas Andri Cracco, Cecilia Desai, Mahesh Hasan, Mudhar Nazar Knoll, Thomas Montanari, Emanuele Pérez-Fentes, Daniel Straub, Michael Thomas, Kay Williams, James C. Brehmer, Marianne Osther, Palle J. S. |
author_sort | Axelsson, Tomas Andri |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate the balance between existing evidence and expert opinions on the safety and efficacy of new technological improvements in lithotripsy techniques for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHODS: A scoping review approach was applied to search literature in Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science. Consensus by key opinion leaders was reached at a 2-day meeting entitled “Consultation on Kidney Stones: Aspects of Intracorporeal Lithotripsy” held in Copenhagen, Denmark, in September 2019. RESULTS: New-generation dual-mode single-probe lithotripsy devices have shown favourable results compared with use of ballistic or ultrasonic lithotripters only. However, ballistic and ultrasonic lithotripters are also highly effective and safe and have been the backbone of PCNL for many years. Compared with standard PCNL, it seems that mini PCNL is associated with fewer bleeding complications and shorter hospital admissions, but also with longer operating room (OR) time and higher intrarenal pressure. Use of laser lithotripsy combined with suction in mini PCNL is a promising alternative that may improve such PCNL by shortening OR times. Furthermore, supine PCNL is a good alternative, especially in cases with complex renal stones and large proximal ureteric stones; in addition, it facilitates endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS). CONCLUSION: Recent technological improvements in PCNL techniques are promising, but there is a lack of high-level evidence on safety and efficacy. Different techniques suit different types of stones and patients. The evolution of diverse methods has given urologists the possibility of a personalized stone approach, in other words, the right approach for the right patient. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8217030 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82170302021-07-09 Consultation on kidney stones, Copenhagen 2019: lithotripsy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy Axelsson, Tomas Andri Cracco, Cecilia Desai, Mahesh Hasan, Mudhar Nazar Knoll, Thomas Montanari, Emanuele Pérez-Fentes, Daniel Straub, Michael Thomas, Kay Williams, James C. Brehmer, Marianne Osther, Palle J. S. World J Urol Topic Paper PURPOSE: To evaluate the balance between existing evidence and expert opinions on the safety and efficacy of new technological improvements in lithotripsy techniques for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHODS: A scoping review approach was applied to search literature in Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science. Consensus by key opinion leaders was reached at a 2-day meeting entitled “Consultation on Kidney Stones: Aspects of Intracorporeal Lithotripsy” held in Copenhagen, Denmark, in September 2019. RESULTS: New-generation dual-mode single-probe lithotripsy devices have shown favourable results compared with use of ballistic or ultrasonic lithotripters only. However, ballistic and ultrasonic lithotripters are also highly effective and safe and have been the backbone of PCNL for many years. Compared with standard PCNL, it seems that mini PCNL is associated with fewer bleeding complications and shorter hospital admissions, but also with longer operating room (OR) time and higher intrarenal pressure. Use of laser lithotripsy combined with suction in mini PCNL is a promising alternative that may improve such PCNL by shortening OR times. Furthermore, supine PCNL is a good alternative, especially in cases with complex renal stones and large proximal ureteric stones; in addition, it facilitates endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS). CONCLUSION: Recent technological improvements in PCNL techniques are promising, but there is a lack of high-level evidence on safety and efficacy. Different techniques suit different types of stones and patients. The evolution of diverse methods has given urologists the possibility of a personalized stone approach, in other words, the right approach for the right patient. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-07-29 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8217030/ /pubmed/32728884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03383-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020, corrected publication 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Topic Paper Axelsson, Tomas Andri Cracco, Cecilia Desai, Mahesh Hasan, Mudhar Nazar Knoll, Thomas Montanari, Emanuele Pérez-Fentes, Daniel Straub, Michael Thomas, Kay Williams, James C. Brehmer, Marianne Osther, Palle J. S. Consultation on kidney stones, Copenhagen 2019: lithotripsy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy |
title | Consultation on kidney stones, Copenhagen 2019: lithotripsy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy |
title_full | Consultation on kidney stones, Copenhagen 2019: lithotripsy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy |
title_fullStr | Consultation on kidney stones, Copenhagen 2019: lithotripsy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Consultation on kidney stones, Copenhagen 2019: lithotripsy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy |
title_short | Consultation on kidney stones, Copenhagen 2019: lithotripsy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy |
title_sort | consultation on kidney stones, copenhagen 2019: lithotripsy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy |
topic | Topic Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8217030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32728884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03383-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT axelssontomasandri consultationonkidneystonescopenhagen2019lithotripsyinpercutaneousnephrolithotomy AT craccocecilia consultationonkidneystonescopenhagen2019lithotripsyinpercutaneousnephrolithotomy AT desaimahesh consultationonkidneystonescopenhagen2019lithotripsyinpercutaneousnephrolithotomy AT hasanmudharnazar consultationonkidneystonescopenhagen2019lithotripsyinpercutaneousnephrolithotomy AT knollthomas consultationonkidneystonescopenhagen2019lithotripsyinpercutaneousnephrolithotomy AT montanariemanuele consultationonkidneystonescopenhagen2019lithotripsyinpercutaneousnephrolithotomy AT perezfentesdaniel consultationonkidneystonescopenhagen2019lithotripsyinpercutaneousnephrolithotomy AT straubmichael consultationonkidneystonescopenhagen2019lithotripsyinpercutaneousnephrolithotomy AT thomaskay consultationonkidneystonescopenhagen2019lithotripsyinpercutaneousnephrolithotomy AT williamsjamesc consultationonkidneystonescopenhagen2019lithotripsyinpercutaneousnephrolithotomy AT brehmermarianne consultationonkidneystonescopenhagen2019lithotripsyinpercutaneousnephrolithotomy AT ostherpallejs consultationonkidneystonescopenhagen2019lithotripsyinpercutaneousnephrolithotomy |