Cargando…

Stress distribution of different lumbar posterior pedicle screw insertion techniques: a combination study of finite element analysis and biomechanical test

At present, the pedicle screw is the most commonly used internal fixation device. However, there are many kinds of common posterior pedicle screw insertion techniques performed to reconstruct the lumbar stability. Therefore, spinal surgeons often face a difficult choice. The stress distribution of i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Mingzhi, Sun, Kebin, Li, Zhonghai, Zong, Junwei, Tian, Xiliang, Ma, Kai, Wang, Shouyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8217271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34155224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90686-6
_version_ 1783710573962199040
author Song, Mingzhi
Sun, Kebin
Li, Zhonghai
Zong, Junwei
Tian, Xiliang
Ma, Kai
Wang, Shouyu
author_facet Song, Mingzhi
Sun, Kebin
Li, Zhonghai
Zong, Junwei
Tian, Xiliang
Ma, Kai
Wang, Shouyu
author_sort Song, Mingzhi
collection PubMed
description At present, the pedicle screw is the most commonly used internal fixation device. However, there are many kinds of common posterior pedicle screw insertion techniques performed to reconstruct the lumbar stability. Therefore, spinal surgeons often face a difficult choice. The stress distribution of internal fixation system is an important index for evaluating safety. Unfortunately, little had been known about the difference of stress distribution of screw-rod systems that established by Roy-Camille, Magerl and Krag insertion techniques. Here, combination of finite element analysis and model measurement research was adopted to evaluate the difference of stress. Following different pedicle screw insertion techniques, three lumbar posterior surgery models were established after modeling and validation of the L1–S1 vertebrae finite element model. By analyzing the data, we found that stress concentration phenomenon was in all the postoperative models. Roy-Camille and Magerl insertion techniques led to the great stress on screw-rod systems. Then, fresh frozen calf spines were selected as a model for subsequent measurements. Fitted with a specially designed test pedicle screw, L5–L6 vertebrae were selected to repeat and verify the results of the finite element analysis. With the aid of universal testing machine and digital torque wrench, models simulated flexion, extension, lateral bending and rotation. Finally, the strain value was captured by the strain gauge and was then calculated as the stress value. Krag and Magerl were found to be the safer choice for pedicle screw insertion. Overall, our combination method obtained the reliable result that Krag insertion technique was the safer approach for pedicle screw implantation due to its relatively dispersive stress. Therefore, without the consideration of screw size, pedicle fill, bone density, and bone structures, we recommend the Krag insertion technique as the first choice to reconstruction of lumbar stability. Additionally, the combination method of finite element analysis and strain gauge measurement can provide a feasible way to study the stress distribution of spinal internal fixation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8217271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82172712021-06-22 Stress distribution of different lumbar posterior pedicle screw insertion techniques: a combination study of finite element analysis and biomechanical test Song, Mingzhi Sun, Kebin Li, Zhonghai Zong, Junwei Tian, Xiliang Ma, Kai Wang, Shouyu Sci Rep Article At present, the pedicle screw is the most commonly used internal fixation device. However, there are many kinds of common posterior pedicle screw insertion techniques performed to reconstruct the lumbar stability. Therefore, spinal surgeons often face a difficult choice. The stress distribution of internal fixation system is an important index for evaluating safety. Unfortunately, little had been known about the difference of stress distribution of screw-rod systems that established by Roy-Camille, Magerl and Krag insertion techniques. Here, combination of finite element analysis and model measurement research was adopted to evaluate the difference of stress. Following different pedicle screw insertion techniques, three lumbar posterior surgery models were established after modeling and validation of the L1–S1 vertebrae finite element model. By analyzing the data, we found that stress concentration phenomenon was in all the postoperative models. Roy-Camille and Magerl insertion techniques led to the great stress on screw-rod systems. Then, fresh frozen calf spines were selected as a model for subsequent measurements. Fitted with a specially designed test pedicle screw, L5–L6 vertebrae were selected to repeat and verify the results of the finite element analysis. With the aid of universal testing machine and digital torque wrench, models simulated flexion, extension, lateral bending and rotation. Finally, the strain value was captured by the strain gauge and was then calculated as the stress value. Krag and Magerl were found to be the safer choice for pedicle screw insertion. Overall, our combination method obtained the reliable result that Krag insertion technique was the safer approach for pedicle screw implantation due to its relatively dispersive stress. Therefore, without the consideration of screw size, pedicle fill, bone density, and bone structures, we recommend the Krag insertion technique as the first choice to reconstruction of lumbar stability. Additionally, the combination method of finite element analysis and strain gauge measurement can provide a feasible way to study the stress distribution of spinal internal fixation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8217271/ /pubmed/34155224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90686-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Song, Mingzhi
Sun, Kebin
Li, Zhonghai
Zong, Junwei
Tian, Xiliang
Ma, Kai
Wang, Shouyu
Stress distribution of different lumbar posterior pedicle screw insertion techniques: a combination study of finite element analysis and biomechanical test
title Stress distribution of different lumbar posterior pedicle screw insertion techniques: a combination study of finite element analysis and biomechanical test
title_full Stress distribution of different lumbar posterior pedicle screw insertion techniques: a combination study of finite element analysis and biomechanical test
title_fullStr Stress distribution of different lumbar posterior pedicle screw insertion techniques: a combination study of finite element analysis and biomechanical test
title_full_unstemmed Stress distribution of different lumbar posterior pedicle screw insertion techniques: a combination study of finite element analysis and biomechanical test
title_short Stress distribution of different lumbar posterior pedicle screw insertion techniques: a combination study of finite element analysis and biomechanical test
title_sort stress distribution of different lumbar posterior pedicle screw insertion techniques: a combination study of finite element analysis and biomechanical test
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8217271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34155224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90686-6
work_keys_str_mv AT songmingzhi stressdistributionofdifferentlumbarposteriorpediclescrewinsertiontechniquesacombinationstudyoffiniteelementanalysisandbiomechanicaltest
AT sunkebin stressdistributionofdifferentlumbarposteriorpediclescrewinsertiontechniquesacombinationstudyoffiniteelementanalysisandbiomechanicaltest
AT lizhonghai stressdistributionofdifferentlumbarposteriorpediclescrewinsertiontechniquesacombinationstudyoffiniteelementanalysisandbiomechanicaltest
AT zongjunwei stressdistributionofdifferentlumbarposteriorpediclescrewinsertiontechniquesacombinationstudyoffiniteelementanalysisandbiomechanicaltest
AT tianxiliang stressdistributionofdifferentlumbarposteriorpediclescrewinsertiontechniquesacombinationstudyoffiniteelementanalysisandbiomechanicaltest
AT makai stressdistributionofdifferentlumbarposteriorpediclescrewinsertiontechniquesacombinationstudyoffiniteelementanalysisandbiomechanicaltest
AT wangshouyu stressdistributionofdifferentlumbarposteriorpediclescrewinsertiontechniquesacombinationstudyoffiniteelementanalysisandbiomechanicaltest