Cargando…
Stress distribution of different lumbar posterior pedicle screw insertion techniques: a combination study of finite element analysis and biomechanical test
At present, the pedicle screw is the most commonly used internal fixation device. However, there are many kinds of common posterior pedicle screw insertion techniques performed to reconstruct the lumbar stability. Therefore, spinal surgeons often face a difficult choice. The stress distribution of i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8217271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34155224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90686-6 |
_version_ | 1783710573962199040 |
---|---|
author | Song, Mingzhi Sun, Kebin Li, Zhonghai Zong, Junwei Tian, Xiliang Ma, Kai Wang, Shouyu |
author_facet | Song, Mingzhi Sun, Kebin Li, Zhonghai Zong, Junwei Tian, Xiliang Ma, Kai Wang, Shouyu |
author_sort | Song, Mingzhi |
collection | PubMed |
description | At present, the pedicle screw is the most commonly used internal fixation device. However, there are many kinds of common posterior pedicle screw insertion techniques performed to reconstruct the lumbar stability. Therefore, spinal surgeons often face a difficult choice. The stress distribution of internal fixation system is an important index for evaluating safety. Unfortunately, little had been known about the difference of stress distribution of screw-rod systems that established by Roy-Camille, Magerl and Krag insertion techniques. Here, combination of finite element analysis and model measurement research was adopted to evaluate the difference of stress. Following different pedicle screw insertion techniques, three lumbar posterior surgery models were established after modeling and validation of the L1–S1 vertebrae finite element model. By analyzing the data, we found that stress concentration phenomenon was in all the postoperative models. Roy-Camille and Magerl insertion techniques led to the great stress on screw-rod systems. Then, fresh frozen calf spines were selected as a model for subsequent measurements. Fitted with a specially designed test pedicle screw, L5–L6 vertebrae were selected to repeat and verify the results of the finite element analysis. With the aid of universal testing machine and digital torque wrench, models simulated flexion, extension, lateral bending and rotation. Finally, the strain value was captured by the strain gauge and was then calculated as the stress value. Krag and Magerl were found to be the safer choice for pedicle screw insertion. Overall, our combination method obtained the reliable result that Krag insertion technique was the safer approach for pedicle screw implantation due to its relatively dispersive stress. Therefore, without the consideration of screw size, pedicle fill, bone density, and bone structures, we recommend the Krag insertion technique as the first choice to reconstruction of lumbar stability. Additionally, the combination method of finite element analysis and strain gauge measurement can provide a feasible way to study the stress distribution of spinal internal fixation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8217271 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82172712021-06-22 Stress distribution of different lumbar posterior pedicle screw insertion techniques: a combination study of finite element analysis and biomechanical test Song, Mingzhi Sun, Kebin Li, Zhonghai Zong, Junwei Tian, Xiliang Ma, Kai Wang, Shouyu Sci Rep Article At present, the pedicle screw is the most commonly used internal fixation device. However, there are many kinds of common posterior pedicle screw insertion techniques performed to reconstruct the lumbar stability. Therefore, spinal surgeons often face a difficult choice. The stress distribution of internal fixation system is an important index for evaluating safety. Unfortunately, little had been known about the difference of stress distribution of screw-rod systems that established by Roy-Camille, Magerl and Krag insertion techniques. Here, combination of finite element analysis and model measurement research was adopted to evaluate the difference of stress. Following different pedicle screw insertion techniques, three lumbar posterior surgery models were established after modeling and validation of the L1–S1 vertebrae finite element model. By analyzing the data, we found that stress concentration phenomenon was in all the postoperative models. Roy-Camille and Magerl insertion techniques led to the great stress on screw-rod systems. Then, fresh frozen calf spines were selected as a model for subsequent measurements. Fitted with a specially designed test pedicle screw, L5–L6 vertebrae were selected to repeat and verify the results of the finite element analysis. With the aid of universal testing machine and digital torque wrench, models simulated flexion, extension, lateral bending and rotation. Finally, the strain value was captured by the strain gauge and was then calculated as the stress value. Krag and Magerl were found to be the safer choice for pedicle screw insertion. Overall, our combination method obtained the reliable result that Krag insertion technique was the safer approach for pedicle screw implantation due to its relatively dispersive stress. Therefore, without the consideration of screw size, pedicle fill, bone density, and bone structures, we recommend the Krag insertion technique as the first choice to reconstruction of lumbar stability. Additionally, the combination method of finite element analysis and strain gauge measurement can provide a feasible way to study the stress distribution of spinal internal fixation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8217271/ /pubmed/34155224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90686-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Song, Mingzhi Sun, Kebin Li, Zhonghai Zong, Junwei Tian, Xiliang Ma, Kai Wang, Shouyu Stress distribution of different lumbar posterior pedicle screw insertion techniques: a combination study of finite element analysis and biomechanical test |
title | Stress distribution of different lumbar posterior pedicle screw insertion techniques: a combination study of finite element analysis and biomechanical test |
title_full | Stress distribution of different lumbar posterior pedicle screw insertion techniques: a combination study of finite element analysis and biomechanical test |
title_fullStr | Stress distribution of different lumbar posterior pedicle screw insertion techniques: a combination study of finite element analysis and biomechanical test |
title_full_unstemmed | Stress distribution of different lumbar posterior pedicle screw insertion techniques: a combination study of finite element analysis and biomechanical test |
title_short | Stress distribution of different lumbar posterior pedicle screw insertion techniques: a combination study of finite element analysis and biomechanical test |
title_sort | stress distribution of different lumbar posterior pedicle screw insertion techniques: a combination study of finite element analysis and biomechanical test |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8217271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34155224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90686-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT songmingzhi stressdistributionofdifferentlumbarposteriorpediclescrewinsertiontechniquesacombinationstudyoffiniteelementanalysisandbiomechanicaltest AT sunkebin stressdistributionofdifferentlumbarposteriorpediclescrewinsertiontechniquesacombinationstudyoffiniteelementanalysisandbiomechanicaltest AT lizhonghai stressdistributionofdifferentlumbarposteriorpediclescrewinsertiontechniquesacombinationstudyoffiniteelementanalysisandbiomechanicaltest AT zongjunwei stressdistributionofdifferentlumbarposteriorpediclescrewinsertiontechniquesacombinationstudyoffiniteelementanalysisandbiomechanicaltest AT tianxiliang stressdistributionofdifferentlumbarposteriorpediclescrewinsertiontechniquesacombinationstudyoffiniteelementanalysisandbiomechanicaltest AT makai stressdistributionofdifferentlumbarposteriorpediclescrewinsertiontechniquesacombinationstudyoffiniteelementanalysisandbiomechanicaltest AT wangshouyu stressdistributionofdifferentlumbarposteriorpediclescrewinsertiontechniquesacombinationstudyoffiniteelementanalysisandbiomechanicaltest |