Cargando…

Risk Stratification for Atrial Fibrillation and Outcomes in Tachycardia-Bradycardia Syndrome: Ablation vs. Pacing

Background: Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation is an alternative treatment for patients with tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome (TBS) to avoid pacemaker implantation. The risk stratification for atrial fibrillation and outcomes between ablation and pacing has not been fully evaluated. Methods: T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Rongfeng, Wang, Yue, Yang, Minghui, Yang, Yiheng, Wang, Zhengyan, Yin, Xiaomeng, Dong, Yingxue, Yu, Xiaohong, Xiao, Xianjie, Gao, Lianjun, Xia, Yunlong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8217458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34169100
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.674471
_version_ 1783710593576861696
author Zhang, Rongfeng
Wang, Yue
Yang, Minghui
Yang, Yiheng
Wang, Zhengyan
Yin, Xiaomeng
Dong, Yingxue
Yu, Xiaohong
Xiao, Xianjie
Gao, Lianjun
Xia, Yunlong
author_facet Zhang, Rongfeng
Wang, Yue
Yang, Minghui
Yang, Yiheng
Wang, Zhengyan
Yin, Xiaomeng
Dong, Yingxue
Yu, Xiaohong
Xiao, Xianjie
Gao, Lianjun
Xia, Yunlong
author_sort Zhang, Rongfeng
collection PubMed
description Background: Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation is an alternative treatment for patients with tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome (TBS) to avoid pacemaker implantation. The risk stratification for atrial fibrillation and outcomes between ablation and pacing has not been fully evaluated. Methods: This retrospective study involved 306 TBS patients, including 141 patients who received catheter ablation (Ablation group, age: 62.2 ± 9.0 months, mean longest pauses: 5.2 ± 2.2 s) and 165 patients who received pacemaker implement (Pacing group, age: 62.3 ± 9.1 months, mean longest pauses: 6.0 ± 2.3 s). The primary endpoint was a composite of call cause mortality, cardiovascular-related hospitalization or thrombosis events (stroke, or peripheral thrombosis). The second endpoint was progress of atrial fibrillation and heart failure. Results: After a median follow-up of 75.4 months, the primary endpoint occurred in significantly higher patients in the pacing group than in the ablation group (59.4 vs.15.6%, OR 6.05, 95% CI: 3.73–9.80, P < 0.001). None of deaths was occurred in ablation group, and 1 death occurred due to cancer. Cardiovascular-related hospitalization occurred in 50.9% of the pacing group compared with 14.2% in the ablation group (OR: 4.87, 95% CI: 2.99–7.95, P < 0.001). More thrombosis events occurred in the pacing group than in the ablation group (12.7 vs. 2.1%, OR 6.06, 95% CI: 1.81–20.35, P = 0.004). Significant more patients progressed to persistent atrial fibrillation in pacing group than in ablation group (23.6 vs. 2.1%, P < 0.001). The NYHA classification of the pacing group was significantly higher than that of the ablation group (2.11 ± 0.83 vs. 1.50 ± 0.74, P < 0.001). The proportion of antiarrhythmic drugs and anticoagulants used in the pacing group was significantly higher than that in the ablation group (41.2 vs. 7.1%, P < 0.001; 16.4 vs. 2.1%, P = 0.009). Conclusion: Catheter ablation for patients with TBS was associated with a significantly lower rate of a composite end point of cardiovascular related hospitalization and thromboembolic events. Furthermore, catheter ablation reduced the progression of atrial fibrillation and heart failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8217458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82174582021-06-23 Risk Stratification for Atrial Fibrillation and Outcomes in Tachycardia-Bradycardia Syndrome: Ablation vs. Pacing Zhang, Rongfeng Wang, Yue Yang, Minghui Yang, Yiheng Wang, Zhengyan Yin, Xiaomeng Dong, Yingxue Yu, Xiaohong Xiao, Xianjie Gao, Lianjun Xia, Yunlong Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Background: Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation is an alternative treatment for patients with tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome (TBS) to avoid pacemaker implantation. The risk stratification for atrial fibrillation and outcomes between ablation and pacing has not been fully evaluated. Methods: This retrospective study involved 306 TBS patients, including 141 patients who received catheter ablation (Ablation group, age: 62.2 ± 9.0 months, mean longest pauses: 5.2 ± 2.2 s) and 165 patients who received pacemaker implement (Pacing group, age: 62.3 ± 9.1 months, mean longest pauses: 6.0 ± 2.3 s). The primary endpoint was a composite of call cause mortality, cardiovascular-related hospitalization or thrombosis events (stroke, or peripheral thrombosis). The second endpoint was progress of atrial fibrillation and heart failure. Results: After a median follow-up of 75.4 months, the primary endpoint occurred in significantly higher patients in the pacing group than in the ablation group (59.4 vs.15.6%, OR 6.05, 95% CI: 3.73–9.80, P < 0.001). None of deaths was occurred in ablation group, and 1 death occurred due to cancer. Cardiovascular-related hospitalization occurred in 50.9% of the pacing group compared with 14.2% in the ablation group (OR: 4.87, 95% CI: 2.99–7.95, P < 0.001). More thrombosis events occurred in the pacing group than in the ablation group (12.7 vs. 2.1%, OR 6.06, 95% CI: 1.81–20.35, P = 0.004). Significant more patients progressed to persistent atrial fibrillation in pacing group than in ablation group (23.6 vs. 2.1%, P < 0.001). The NYHA classification of the pacing group was significantly higher than that of the ablation group (2.11 ± 0.83 vs. 1.50 ± 0.74, P < 0.001). The proportion of antiarrhythmic drugs and anticoagulants used in the pacing group was significantly higher than that in the ablation group (41.2 vs. 7.1%, P < 0.001; 16.4 vs. 2.1%, P = 0.009). Conclusion: Catheter ablation for patients with TBS was associated with a significantly lower rate of a composite end point of cardiovascular related hospitalization and thromboembolic events. Furthermore, catheter ablation reduced the progression of atrial fibrillation and heart failure. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8217458/ /pubmed/34169100 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.674471 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhang, Wang, Yang, Yang, Wang, Yin, Dong, Yu, Xiao, Gao and Xia. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Zhang, Rongfeng
Wang, Yue
Yang, Minghui
Yang, Yiheng
Wang, Zhengyan
Yin, Xiaomeng
Dong, Yingxue
Yu, Xiaohong
Xiao, Xianjie
Gao, Lianjun
Xia, Yunlong
Risk Stratification for Atrial Fibrillation and Outcomes in Tachycardia-Bradycardia Syndrome: Ablation vs. Pacing
title Risk Stratification for Atrial Fibrillation and Outcomes in Tachycardia-Bradycardia Syndrome: Ablation vs. Pacing
title_full Risk Stratification for Atrial Fibrillation and Outcomes in Tachycardia-Bradycardia Syndrome: Ablation vs. Pacing
title_fullStr Risk Stratification for Atrial Fibrillation and Outcomes in Tachycardia-Bradycardia Syndrome: Ablation vs. Pacing
title_full_unstemmed Risk Stratification for Atrial Fibrillation and Outcomes in Tachycardia-Bradycardia Syndrome: Ablation vs. Pacing
title_short Risk Stratification for Atrial Fibrillation and Outcomes in Tachycardia-Bradycardia Syndrome: Ablation vs. Pacing
title_sort risk stratification for atrial fibrillation and outcomes in tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome: ablation vs. pacing
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8217458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34169100
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.674471
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangrongfeng riskstratificationforatrialfibrillationandoutcomesintachycardiabradycardiasyndromeablationvspacing
AT wangyue riskstratificationforatrialfibrillationandoutcomesintachycardiabradycardiasyndromeablationvspacing
AT yangminghui riskstratificationforatrialfibrillationandoutcomesintachycardiabradycardiasyndromeablationvspacing
AT yangyiheng riskstratificationforatrialfibrillationandoutcomesintachycardiabradycardiasyndromeablationvspacing
AT wangzhengyan riskstratificationforatrialfibrillationandoutcomesintachycardiabradycardiasyndromeablationvspacing
AT yinxiaomeng riskstratificationforatrialfibrillationandoutcomesintachycardiabradycardiasyndromeablationvspacing
AT dongyingxue riskstratificationforatrialfibrillationandoutcomesintachycardiabradycardiasyndromeablationvspacing
AT yuxiaohong riskstratificationforatrialfibrillationandoutcomesintachycardiabradycardiasyndromeablationvspacing
AT xiaoxianjie riskstratificationforatrialfibrillationandoutcomesintachycardiabradycardiasyndromeablationvspacing
AT gaolianjun riskstratificationforatrialfibrillationandoutcomesintachycardiabradycardiasyndromeablationvspacing
AT xiayunlong riskstratificationforatrialfibrillationandoutcomesintachycardiabradycardiasyndromeablationvspacing