Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness of Baricitinib for Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis After Methotrexate Failed in China

INTRODUCTION: A phase 3 (RA-BEAM study) clinical trial reported that baricitinib (BCT) + methotrexate (MTX) had clinical improvement compared with adalimumab (ADA) + MTX as a first-line strategy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had inadequate responses to MTX monotherapy. However, from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, SiNi, Li, JianHe, Peng, LiuBao, Li, YaMin, Wan, XiaoMin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8217482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33893943
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-021-00308-w
_version_ 1783710598804013056
author Li, SiNi
Li, JianHe
Peng, LiuBao
Li, YaMin
Wan, XiaoMin
author_facet Li, SiNi
Li, JianHe
Peng, LiuBao
Li, YaMin
Wan, XiaoMin
author_sort Li, SiNi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A phase 3 (RA-BEAM study) clinical trial reported that baricitinib (BCT) + methotrexate (MTX) had clinical improvement compared with adalimumab (ADA) + MTX as a first-line strategy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had inadequate responses to MTX monotherapy. However, from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, the cost-effectiveness of introducing BCT into current treatment for patients with RA unresponsive to MTX remains unclear. METHODS: A patient-level microsimulation model was used to extrapolate the lifetime incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and other outcomes. This study compared treatment sequences with or without first-line BCT with current treatment sequences, including adalimumab, etanercept, tocilizumab, and palliative care. Effectiveness and physical function were assessed using the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 response and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). The input parameters of the model, comprising patient characteristics (sex and age) and treatment efficacy (ACR responses and HAQ score), were derived from a phase III clinical trial and network meta-analysis. The total cost estimation included direct costs and indirect costs. Probabilistic and univariate sensitivity analyses were performed, as were a series of scenario analyses. RESULTS: The lifetime analysis revealed that adding BCT as a first-line treatment resulted in a QALY gain of 2.66 years; this gain would cost an incremental $26,662, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $10,036/QALY per patient compared with the current treatment sequence. Sensitivity and scenario analyses showed the results to be robust. CONCLUSIONS: From a Chinese payer perspective, the introduction of BCT into the current treatment sequence is projected to be a cost-effective option as first-, second-, third-, and fourth-line treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe RA. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-021-00308-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8217482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82174822021-07-01 Cost-Effectiveness of Baricitinib for Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis After Methotrexate Failed in China Li, SiNi Li, JianHe Peng, LiuBao Li, YaMin Wan, XiaoMin Rheumatol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: A phase 3 (RA-BEAM study) clinical trial reported that baricitinib (BCT) + methotrexate (MTX) had clinical improvement compared with adalimumab (ADA) + MTX as a first-line strategy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had inadequate responses to MTX monotherapy. However, from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, the cost-effectiveness of introducing BCT into current treatment for patients with RA unresponsive to MTX remains unclear. METHODS: A patient-level microsimulation model was used to extrapolate the lifetime incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and other outcomes. This study compared treatment sequences with or without first-line BCT with current treatment sequences, including adalimumab, etanercept, tocilizumab, and palliative care. Effectiveness and physical function were assessed using the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 response and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). The input parameters of the model, comprising patient characteristics (sex and age) and treatment efficacy (ACR responses and HAQ score), were derived from a phase III clinical trial and network meta-analysis. The total cost estimation included direct costs and indirect costs. Probabilistic and univariate sensitivity analyses were performed, as were a series of scenario analyses. RESULTS: The lifetime analysis revealed that adding BCT as a first-line treatment resulted in a QALY gain of 2.66 years; this gain would cost an incremental $26,662, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $10,036/QALY per patient compared with the current treatment sequence. Sensitivity and scenario analyses showed the results to be robust. CONCLUSIONS: From a Chinese payer perspective, the introduction of BCT into the current treatment sequence is projected to be a cost-effective option as first-, second-, third-, and fourth-line treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe RA. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-021-00308-w. Springer Healthcare 2021-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8217482/ /pubmed/33893943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-021-00308-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Li, SiNi
Li, JianHe
Peng, LiuBao
Li, YaMin
Wan, XiaoMin
Cost-Effectiveness of Baricitinib for Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis After Methotrexate Failed in China
title Cost-Effectiveness of Baricitinib for Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis After Methotrexate Failed in China
title_full Cost-Effectiveness of Baricitinib for Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis After Methotrexate Failed in China
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness of Baricitinib for Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis After Methotrexate Failed in China
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness of Baricitinib for Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis After Methotrexate Failed in China
title_short Cost-Effectiveness of Baricitinib for Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis After Methotrexate Failed in China
title_sort cost-effectiveness of baricitinib for patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis after methotrexate failed in china
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8217482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33893943
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-021-00308-w
work_keys_str_mv AT lisini costeffectivenessofbaricitinibforpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritisaftermethotrexatefailedinchina
AT lijianhe costeffectivenessofbaricitinibforpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritisaftermethotrexatefailedinchina
AT pengliubao costeffectivenessofbaricitinibforpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritisaftermethotrexatefailedinchina
AT liyamin costeffectivenessofbaricitinibforpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritisaftermethotrexatefailedinchina
AT wanxiaomin costeffectivenessofbaricitinibforpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritisaftermethotrexatefailedinchina