Cargando…
Comparing the efficacy of two different temperature stimulation in warm acupuncture on acute low back pain: A randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Warm acupuncture, a combination of the mechanical stimulation of acupuncture and thermal stimulation of moxibustion, is commonly used in treating acute low back pain (LBP). This trial aimed to compare the efficacy of stronger (above 43°C) and weaker (above 40°C) heat stimulation in warm...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8217681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34189032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2021.100748 |
_version_ | 1783710643222740992 |
---|---|
author | Li, Tian Wang, Siyao Cheng, Ke Sun, Lu Jin, Daopeng Zhang, Shen Yang, Zhen Huang, Zouqin |
author_facet | Li, Tian Wang, Siyao Cheng, Ke Sun, Lu Jin, Daopeng Zhang, Shen Yang, Zhen Huang, Zouqin |
author_sort | Li, Tian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Warm acupuncture, a combination of the mechanical stimulation of acupuncture and thermal stimulation of moxibustion, is commonly used in treating acute low back pain (LBP). This trial aimed to compare the efficacy of stronger (above 43°C) and weaker (above 40°C) heat stimulation in warm acupuncture on the function and pain in patients with acute LBP due to lumbosacral disc degeneration (LDD). METHODS: One hundred and fifty-nine adults were randomly assigned to receive warm acupuncture treatment with silver needle (SvN) or with stainless steel needle (SSN) (1:1). Both groups received a 3-week therapy with 3 sessions per week. The primary outcome was the modified Oswestry Disability Index at week 4. The secondary outcomes included average pain, three physical sign tests and adverse events. Participants were followed up at week 16 and week 28 after randomization. RESULTS: The LBP related disability and pain intensity significantly relieved more in the SvN warm acupuncture group than in the SSN group, in both the short and long term (p<0.001). The between-groups difference in physical signs showed statistical significance only in the short term (p = 0.024), but not in long term (p = 0.081; p = 0.069). CONCLUSION: Compared with warm acupuncture with stainless-steel needle at above 40°C, warm acupuncture with silver needle at above 43°C relieved more disability and pain in patients with acute LBP due to LDD. STUDY REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1800019051) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8217681 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82176812021-06-28 Comparing the efficacy of two different temperature stimulation in warm acupuncture on acute low back pain: A randomized controlled trial Li, Tian Wang, Siyao Cheng, Ke Sun, Lu Jin, Daopeng Zhang, Shen Yang, Zhen Huang, Zouqin Integr Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Warm acupuncture, a combination of the mechanical stimulation of acupuncture and thermal stimulation of moxibustion, is commonly used in treating acute low back pain (LBP). This trial aimed to compare the efficacy of stronger (above 43°C) and weaker (above 40°C) heat stimulation in warm acupuncture on the function and pain in patients with acute LBP due to lumbosacral disc degeneration (LDD). METHODS: One hundred and fifty-nine adults were randomly assigned to receive warm acupuncture treatment with silver needle (SvN) or with stainless steel needle (SSN) (1:1). Both groups received a 3-week therapy with 3 sessions per week. The primary outcome was the modified Oswestry Disability Index at week 4. The secondary outcomes included average pain, three physical sign tests and adverse events. Participants were followed up at week 16 and week 28 after randomization. RESULTS: The LBP related disability and pain intensity significantly relieved more in the SvN warm acupuncture group than in the SSN group, in both the short and long term (p<0.001). The between-groups difference in physical signs showed statistical significance only in the short term (p = 0.024), but not in long term (p = 0.081; p = 0.069). CONCLUSION: Compared with warm acupuncture with stainless-steel needle at above 40°C, warm acupuncture with silver needle at above 43°C relieved more disability and pain in patients with acute LBP due to LDD. STUDY REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1800019051) Elsevier 2022-03 2021-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8217681/ /pubmed/34189032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2021.100748 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Li, Tian Wang, Siyao Cheng, Ke Sun, Lu Jin, Daopeng Zhang, Shen Yang, Zhen Huang, Zouqin Comparing the efficacy of two different temperature stimulation in warm acupuncture on acute low back pain: A randomized controlled trial |
title | Comparing the efficacy of two different temperature stimulation in warm acupuncture on acute low back pain: A randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Comparing the efficacy of two different temperature stimulation in warm acupuncture on acute low back pain: A randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparing the efficacy of two different temperature stimulation in warm acupuncture on acute low back pain: A randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing the efficacy of two different temperature stimulation in warm acupuncture on acute low back pain: A randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Comparing the efficacy of two different temperature stimulation in warm acupuncture on acute low back pain: A randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | comparing the efficacy of two different temperature stimulation in warm acupuncture on acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8217681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34189032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2021.100748 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT litian comparingtheefficacyoftwodifferenttemperaturestimulationinwarmacupunctureonacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wangsiyao comparingtheefficacyoftwodifferenttemperaturestimulationinwarmacupunctureonacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chengke comparingtheefficacyoftwodifferenttemperaturestimulationinwarmacupunctureonacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sunlu comparingtheefficacyoftwodifferenttemperaturestimulationinwarmacupunctureonacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jindaopeng comparingtheefficacyoftwodifferenttemperaturestimulationinwarmacupunctureonacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zhangshen comparingtheefficacyoftwodifferenttemperaturestimulationinwarmacupunctureonacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yangzhen comparingtheefficacyoftwodifferenttemperaturestimulationinwarmacupunctureonacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT huangzouqin comparingtheefficacyoftwodifferenttemperaturestimulationinwarmacupunctureonacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial |