Cargando…

Comparing the efficacy of two different temperature stimulation in warm acupuncture on acute low back pain: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Warm acupuncture, a combination of the mechanical stimulation of acupuncture and thermal stimulation of moxibustion, is commonly used in treating acute low back pain (LBP). This trial aimed to compare the efficacy of stronger (above 43°C) and weaker (above 40°C) heat stimulation in warm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Tian, Wang, Siyao, Cheng, Ke, Sun, Lu, Jin, Daopeng, Zhang, Shen, Yang, Zhen, Huang, Zouqin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8217681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34189032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2021.100748
_version_ 1783710643222740992
author Li, Tian
Wang, Siyao
Cheng, Ke
Sun, Lu
Jin, Daopeng
Zhang, Shen
Yang, Zhen
Huang, Zouqin
author_facet Li, Tian
Wang, Siyao
Cheng, Ke
Sun, Lu
Jin, Daopeng
Zhang, Shen
Yang, Zhen
Huang, Zouqin
author_sort Li, Tian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Warm acupuncture, a combination of the mechanical stimulation of acupuncture and thermal stimulation of moxibustion, is commonly used in treating acute low back pain (LBP). This trial aimed to compare the efficacy of stronger (above 43°C) and weaker (above 40°C) heat stimulation in warm acupuncture on the function and pain in patients with acute LBP due to lumbosacral disc degeneration (LDD). METHODS: One hundred and fifty-nine adults were randomly assigned to receive warm acupuncture treatment with silver needle (SvN) or with stainless steel needle (SSN) (1:1). Both groups received a 3-week therapy with 3 sessions per week. The primary outcome was the modified Oswestry Disability Index at week 4. The secondary outcomes included average pain, three physical sign tests and adverse events. Participants were followed up at week 16 and week 28 after randomization. RESULTS: The LBP related disability and pain intensity significantly relieved more in the SvN warm acupuncture group than in the SSN group, in both the short and long term (p<0.001). The between-groups difference in physical signs showed statistical significance only in the short term (p = 0.024), but not in long term (p = 0.081; p = 0.069). CONCLUSION: Compared with warm acupuncture with stainless-steel needle at above 40°C, warm acupuncture with silver needle at above 43°C relieved more disability and pain in patients with acute LBP due to LDD. STUDY REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1800019051)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8217681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82176812021-06-28 Comparing the efficacy of two different temperature stimulation in warm acupuncture on acute low back pain: A randomized controlled trial Li, Tian Wang, Siyao Cheng, Ke Sun, Lu Jin, Daopeng Zhang, Shen Yang, Zhen Huang, Zouqin Integr Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Warm acupuncture, a combination of the mechanical stimulation of acupuncture and thermal stimulation of moxibustion, is commonly used in treating acute low back pain (LBP). This trial aimed to compare the efficacy of stronger (above 43°C) and weaker (above 40°C) heat stimulation in warm acupuncture on the function and pain in patients with acute LBP due to lumbosacral disc degeneration (LDD). METHODS: One hundred and fifty-nine adults were randomly assigned to receive warm acupuncture treatment with silver needle (SvN) or with stainless steel needle (SSN) (1:1). Both groups received a 3-week therapy with 3 sessions per week. The primary outcome was the modified Oswestry Disability Index at week 4. The secondary outcomes included average pain, three physical sign tests and adverse events. Participants were followed up at week 16 and week 28 after randomization. RESULTS: The LBP related disability and pain intensity significantly relieved more in the SvN warm acupuncture group than in the SSN group, in both the short and long term (p<0.001). The between-groups difference in physical signs showed statistical significance only in the short term (p = 0.024), but not in long term (p = 0.081; p = 0.069). CONCLUSION: Compared with warm acupuncture with stainless-steel needle at above 40°C, warm acupuncture with silver needle at above 43°C relieved more disability and pain in patients with acute LBP due to LDD. STUDY REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1800019051) Elsevier 2022-03 2021-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8217681/ /pubmed/34189032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2021.100748 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Li, Tian
Wang, Siyao
Cheng, Ke
Sun, Lu
Jin, Daopeng
Zhang, Shen
Yang, Zhen
Huang, Zouqin
Comparing the efficacy of two different temperature stimulation in warm acupuncture on acute low back pain: A randomized controlled trial
title Comparing the efficacy of two different temperature stimulation in warm acupuncture on acute low back pain: A randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparing the efficacy of two different temperature stimulation in warm acupuncture on acute low back pain: A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparing the efficacy of two different temperature stimulation in warm acupuncture on acute low back pain: A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the efficacy of two different temperature stimulation in warm acupuncture on acute low back pain: A randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparing the efficacy of two different temperature stimulation in warm acupuncture on acute low back pain: A randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparing the efficacy of two different temperature stimulation in warm acupuncture on acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8217681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34189032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2021.100748
work_keys_str_mv AT litian comparingtheefficacyoftwodifferenttemperaturestimulationinwarmacupunctureonacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wangsiyao comparingtheefficacyoftwodifferenttemperaturestimulationinwarmacupunctureonacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chengke comparingtheefficacyoftwodifferenttemperaturestimulationinwarmacupunctureonacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sunlu comparingtheefficacyoftwodifferenttemperaturestimulationinwarmacupunctureonacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jindaopeng comparingtheefficacyoftwodifferenttemperaturestimulationinwarmacupunctureonacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhangshen comparingtheefficacyoftwodifferenttemperaturestimulationinwarmacupunctureonacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yangzhen comparingtheefficacyoftwodifferenttemperaturestimulationinwarmacupunctureonacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT huangzouqin comparingtheefficacyoftwodifferenttemperaturestimulationinwarmacupunctureonacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial