Cargando…

Influence of Epidural Ropivacaine with or without Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Analgesia and Patient Satisfaction after Thoraco-Lumbar Spine Instrumentation: A Randomized, Comparative, and Double-Blind Study

STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective, randomized, and double-blind study. PURPOSE: Thoraco-lumbar spine surgery is associated with severe postoperative pain and can cause chronic pain. We aimed to compare the impact of epidural ropivacaine with and without dexmedetomidine on postoperative analgesia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qureshi, Faisal, Meena, Shyam Charan, Kumar, Vishal, Jain, Kajal, Chauhan, Rajeev, Luthra, Ankur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8217855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32872755
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0072
_version_ 1783710677926412288
author Qureshi, Faisal
Meena, Shyam Charan
Kumar, Vishal
Jain, Kajal
Chauhan, Rajeev
Luthra, Ankur
author_facet Qureshi, Faisal
Meena, Shyam Charan
Kumar, Vishal
Jain, Kajal
Chauhan, Rajeev
Luthra, Ankur
author_sort Qureshi, Faisal
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective, randomized, and double-blind study. PURPOSE: Thoraco-lumbar spine surgery is associated with severe postoperative pain and can cause chronic pain. We aimed to compare the impact of epidural ropivacaine with and without dexmedetomidine on postoperative analgesia after thoracolumbar spine instrumentation wherein an epidural catheter was placed by the surgeon intraoperatively. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Very few studies have reported the use of epidural dexmedetomidine in spine surgeries. When used via the epidural route, dexmedetomidine is safe and efficacious and is associated with reduced rescue analgesia consumption, increased duration of analgesia, reduced pain scores, but not with major hemodynamic adverse effects. METHODS: Total 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists I–III adult patients aged 18–65 years who were scheduled to undergo thoraco-lumbar spine instrumentation were randomly allocated into group RD (epidural ropivacaine+dexmedetomidine) or group R (epidural ropivacaine plus saline). We aimed to compare the total rescue analgesic consumption on postoperative day 0, 1, and 2. Moreover, we studied the time to first rescue analgesia with visual analogue scale score <4 and the overall patient satisfaction scores. RESULTS: There was no difference between the demographic characteristics of the two groups. The mean value of total rescue analgesia consumption was 162.5±68.4 mg in the RD group and 247.5±48.8 mg in the R group. The mean time to first rescue analgesia was 594.6±83.0 minutes in the RD group and 103.6±53.2 minutes in the R group. The mean patient satisfaction score was 4.2±0.7 in the RD group and 3.2±0.6 in the R group. No patient had any respiratory depression or prolonged motor blockade during the postoperative period. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the superior efficacy, in terms of postoperative analgesia and patient satisfaction scores, of epidural ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine over that of ropivacaine alone in patients undergoing surgery for thoraco-lumbar spine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8217855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Korean Society of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82178552021-07-02 Influence of Epidural Ropivacaine with or without Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Analgesia and Patient Satisfaction after Thoraco-Lumbar Spine Instrumentation: A Randomized, Comparative, and Double-Blind Study Qureshi, Faisal Meena, Shyam Charan Kumar, Vishal Jain, Kajal Chauhan, Rajeev Luthra, Ankur Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective, randomized, and double-blind study. PURPOSE: Thoraco-lumbar spine surgery is associated with severe postoperative pain and can cause chronic pain. We aimed to compare the impact of epidural ropivacaine with and without dexmedetomidine on postoperative analgesia after thoracolumbar spine instrumentation wherein an epidural catheter was placed by the surgeon intraoperatively. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Very few studies have reported the use of epidural dexmedetomidine in spine surgeries. When used via the epidural route, dexmedetomidine is safe and efficacious and is associated with reduced rescue analgesia consumption, increased duration of analgesia, reduced pain scores, but not with major hemodynamic adverse effects. METHODS: Total 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists I–III adult patients aged 18–65 years who were scheduled to undergo thoraco-lumbar spine instrumentation were randomly allocated into group RD (epidural ropivacaine+dexmedetomidine) or group R (epidural ropivacaine plus saline). We aimed to compare the total rescue analgesic consumption on postoperative day 0, 1, and 2. Moreover, we studied the time to first rescue analgesia with visual analogue scale score <4 and the overall patient satisfaction scores. RESULTS: There was no difference between the demographic characteristics of the two groups. The mean value of total rescue analgesia consumption was 162.5±68.4 mg in the RD group and 247.5±48.8 mg in the R group. The mean time to first rescue analgesia was 594.6±83.0 minutes in the RD group and 103.6±53.2 minutes in the R group. The mean patient satisfaction score was 4.2±0.7 in the RD group and 3.2±0.6 in the R group. No patient had any respiratory depression or prolonged motor blockade during the postoperative period. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the superior efficacy, in terms of postoperative analgesia and patient satisfaction scores, of epidural ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine over that of ropivacaine alone in patients undergoing surgery for thoraco-lumbar spine. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2021-06 2020-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8217855/ /pubmed/32872755 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0072 Text en Copyright © 2021 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Qureshi, Faisal
Meena, Shyam Charan
Kumar, Vishal
Jain, Kajal
Chauhan, Rajeev
Luthra, Ankur
Influence of Epidural Ropivacaine with or without Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Analgesia and Patient Satisfaction after Thoraco-Lumbar Spine Instrumentation: A Randomized, Comparative, and Double-Blind Study
title Influence of Epidural Ropivacaine with or without Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Analgesia and Patient Satisfaction after Thoraco-Lumbar Spine Instrumentation: A Randomized, Comparative, and Double-Blind Study
title_full Influence of Epidural Ropivacaine with or without Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Analgesia and Patient Satisfaction after Thoraco-Lumbar Spine Instrumentation: A Randomized, Comparative, and Double-Blind Study
title_fullStr Influence of Epidural Ropivacaine with or without Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Analgesia and Patient Satisfaction after Thoraco-Lumbar Spine Instrumentation: A Randomized, Comparative, and Double-Blind Study
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Epidural Ropivacaine with or without Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Analgesia and Patient Satisfaction after Thoraco-Lumbar Spine Instrumentation: A Randomized, Comparative, and Double-Blind Study
title_short Influence of Epidural Ropivacaine with or without Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Analgesia and Patient Satisfaction after Thoraco-Lumbar Spine Instrumentation: A Randomized, Comparative, and Double-Blind Study
title_sort influence of epidural ropivacaine with or without dexmedetomidine on postoperative analgesia and patient satisfaction after thoraco-lumbar spine instrumentation: a randomized, comparative, and double-blind study
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8217855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32872755
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0072
work_keys_str_mv AT qureshifaisal influenceofepiduralropivacainewithorwithoutdexmedetomidineonpostoperativeanalgesiaandpatientsatisfactionafterthoracolumbarspineinstrumentationarandomizedcomparativeanddoubleblindstudy
AT meenashyamcharan influenceofepiduralropivacainewithorwithoutdexmedetomidineonpostoperativeanalgesiaandpatientsatisfactionafterthoracolumbarspineinstrumentationarandomizedcomparativeanddoubleblindstudy
AT kumarvishal influenceofepiduralropivacainewithorwithoutdexmedetomidineonpostoperativeanalgesiaandpatientsatisfactionafterthoracolumbarspineinstrumentationarandomizedcomparativeanddoubleblindstudy
AT jainkajal influenceofepiduralropivacainewithorwithoutdexmedetomidineonpostoperativeanalgesiaandpatientsatisfactionafterthoracolumbarspineinstrumentationarandomizedcomparativeanddoubleblindstudy
AT chauhanrajeev influenceofepiduralropivacainewithorwithoutdexmedetomidineonpostoperativeanalgesiaandpatientsatisfactionafterthoracolumbarspineinstrumentationarandomizedcomparativeanddoubleblindstudy
AT luthraankur influenceofepiduralropivacainewithorwithoutdexmedetomidineonpostoperativeanalgesiaandpatientsatisfactionafterthoracolumbarspineinstrumentationarandomizedcomparativeanddoubleblindstudy